webbles Posted July 3, 2019 Posted July 3, 2019 1 hour ago, changed said: The church failed in sending him on a mission in the first place. If this had been a school that had sent a young man on an exchange program, would you be saying that the school failed in sending the young man on the exchange program? Both the church and the school were not aware of what he did. Both the church and the school immediately sent him back home when they discovered what he had done. Would you blame the school for sending the young man in the first place? Or it was a business that sent a young man on a business trip where he would live and work for several months. Would you say that the business failed because it sent the young man in the first place? 4
Popular Post bsjkki Posted July 3, 2019 Popular Post Posted July 3, 2019 1 hour ago, changed said: The church failed in sending him on a mission in the first place. I think you expect Bishop infallibility when we don’t even believe in Prophet infallibility. The kid is an expert liar and manipulator and this is all on him. He was sent home as soon as evidence surfaced and he will be going to jail for a very long time. The predators are really, really good liars. Thank goodness one brave victim came forward to get the investigation started. She is a hero. I think your expectations of humans is a little unrealistic. 7
thatjimguy Posted July 26, 2019 Posted July 26, 2019 On 6/28/2019 at 5:13 PM, Calm said: I suspect the thought was also people might watch them to focus on other things or strengthen resolve when tempted. With so many, it will hopefully not become so repetitive as to lose the ability to get one's attention. You are right. There probably is a risk of desensitization from over saturation. Erring on the side of aggression is better here though I think.
Recommended Posts