Uncle Dale Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 ... You have to decide which path you wish to tread.... One choice would be to stick to the Standard Works,official Messages of the First Presidency of the OneTrue Church, and closely related restoration texts. "Tower to get to heaven" is included in my Lamoni editionof the BoM -- I haven't consulted the title page of anymore recent printings from other sects. Either the languages of all the world's peoples wereconfused after that "tower to get to heaven" iniquitywas perpetrated -- or they were not. If the languagelearned in school by Maharoni Moriancumer, Ether,the Brother of Jared, etc. was NOT changed, thenI'm sure that the Standard Works, etc. will mentionsuch a fact. And if the language of Oregon horseeating pre-Jaredites was or was not changed, afterthat "tower to get to heaven" fiasco, that small thingmatters not too much (other than to raise a question). UD
Sevenbak Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 (edited) Let's say that such things once happened much more quicklythan during the past few millennia, and that the spacing betweenthe cooled lava lines happened in hundreds of years, ratherthan millions. The notion is a ridiculous one, but if accepted,even that calculation would have left the sundered coastlinesof South America and Brazil a veritable "stone's throw" apartbefore, during and after Peleg's lengthy lifetime. UDThe notion is a ridiculous one? I think not. I don't know if you accept the words of Joseph Smith on the matter in the D&C over in the Community of Christ, but I can tell you that D&C 133 is the prophet Joseph speaking, and he's not talking about the 2nd coming being a period of millions of years. This is one of those known science versus faith things IMO. I don't think they can be rectified. For me an my house, I choose the latter. 22 And it shall be a voice as the avoice of many waters, and as the voice of a great bthunder, which shall cbreakdown the mountains, and the valleys shall not be found. 23 He shall command the great deep, and it shall be driven back into the north countries, and the aislands shall become one land; 24 And the aland of Jerusalem and the land of bZion shall be turned back into their own place, and the cearth shall be like as it was in the days before it was ddivided. 25 And the Lord, even the Savior, shall astand in the midst of his people, and shall breign over all flesh. 26 And they who are in the anorth countries shall come in remembrance before the Lord; and their prophets shall hear his voice, and shall no longer stay themselves; and they shall bsmite the rocks, and the ice shall flow down at their presence. 27 And an ahighway shall be cast up in the midst of the great deep. Edited February 9, 2015 by Sevenbak
Uncle Dale Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 ... 27 And an ahighway shall be cast up in the midst of the great deep. Why "cast up" a great highway, between the north polar region and Jackson County,Missouri? The reason for such an energetic endeavor escapes my memory. Certainly this mentioned highway will not be intended to provide a safe pathdown through Canada, the Dakotas and Iowa to Independence -- so thatten lost tribes of Israelites can gather around a millennial temple there, threetribes to a side of its square. But, supposing that global climate change continues to increase in intensity,and every fragment of ice and snow north of the Tropic of Cancer melts away:then perhaps any tribesmen still surviving up there will welcome the thoughtfulprovision of a causeway over flooded Alberta and Saskatchewan. I'll believe it when I see it... UD
Robert F. Smith Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 One choice would be to stick to the Standard Works,official Messages of the First Presidency of the OneTrue Church, and closely related restoration texts.........................................................Yes, but then you will have to decide which is the true church, if any.
Uncle Dale Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Yes, but then you will have to decide which is the true church, if any. Why just me? ... Let's have all the interested participants for thisboard register their choices and we can tabulate the results. Mark me down for the ecclesia veritas being any faithfulassembly John the Baptizer presided over. UD
Robert F. Smith Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 .......................................The Institute teacher was one of the noted Yorgason brothers(Blaine I think it was) and in no way an idiot. His focus was notupon Smith's activities prior to resumption of the translationof the Nephite Record, but thereafter. According to the class hand-outs Smith then had the U&T takenaway from him. Handout #12 (xeroxed) is from page 43 of Allenand Leonard's 1976 edition of "Story of the Latter-day Saints,"and ends with the words "but also the plates and the urim andthummim..." I do not have their 1st edition, but in the 2nd edition a similarparagraph goes on to say "the urim and thummim were restoredto him..." Interesting that the CES granted me credit for completing anauthorized class, that taught false doctrine. No doubt these errors have been corrected in the 21st centuryclasses, yes?...................................I don't know about any of that, Dale, but just consider yourself lucky that it wasn't Sterling McMurrin or Grant Palmer teaching on that occasion -- both were CES instructors. On the oher hand, David Bokovoy is a CES instructor. So they can't all be bad.
Robert F. Smith Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Why just me? ... Let's have all the interested participants for thisboard register their choices and we can tabulate the results. Mark me down for the ecclesia veritas being any faithfulassembly John the Baptizer presided over. UDDoes that include the Mandaeans?
Sevenbak Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Why "cast up" a great highway, between the north polar region and Jackson County,Missouri? ...I'll believe it when I see it...UDYou missed the point. "The land of" actually means something.
Uncle Dale Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 You missed the point. "The land of" actually means something. I frequently do. Perhaps that why I always lose, playing quoits. But, if somebody really wishes to believe that the continentalplates of this planet will suddenly converge, in anything lessthan, say, half a billion years from now... well, I can only hopethat they are not teaching geodynamics at Scripps Institute;nor even at Seaworld. There are cataclysmic geomorphological events every now and then, of course. I would have hated to see the surprisedIndians fishing in the rivers of the Columbia valley when ancientLake Bonneville suddenly broke through Red Rock Pass, andbrought brineshimp bayou down to about its current size. But, no, the eons of snow accumulation in Greenland andthe Antarctic were not tricks provided by the Devil, to confusefaithful Assembly of God ice-core drillers. Nor were thecontinents significantly parted in biblical times. Nor will therebe any last days gathering of Lamanites, Ephraimites andLost Tribeites in Jackson County, Missouri (causeway or not). Sorry about that. Sometimes the things taught in our schoolsby the scientists are actually correct precepts. Which brings me back to Talmadge and Dr. Walter Buss of Ogden.But that's a tale for another long February night... UD
Uncle Dale Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Does that include the Mandaeans? Dunno. Were they included in any of the Hebrew Biblepassages providing the basis for our word "church?" Trace the word backwards to its earliest occurrencesin the texts, and maybe an answer will be provided. But the addition of something related to the word "true"will be required in such a search -- for (I'm told) thatthe Hebrew and Aramaic references to assemblies canbe applied both to gatherings of the faithful of Israeland gatherings down at Sepphoris' Friday Fish Market. UD
Michael13365 Posted February 12, 2015 Posted February 12, 2015 The use of peep stones, or seer stones, was quite common among the New Englanders who settled in western New York when those lands were opened for settlement following the American Revolution. That area had been the homeland of the Senecas and was rich in artifacts of all kinds. Digging for artifacts, which mostly turned out to be little valued flints and European trade goods, was a sort of mania for a while. It seems undeniable that Joseph and his neighbors made use of such stones in a hunt for supposed treasures in the old Seneca sites. The Urim and Thummin were fairly obscure Biblical references and scarcely in common use. It is not surprising that the terms were not used at the time when the plates were uncovered.In my fictional version of Joseph's life, I see him as sharing the belief in special stones and buried treasures common in his culture. The Smith's neighbors, the Chase family, were quite involved in such practices and it seems that Sally Chase, a few years older than Joseph, might have influenced his thinking. She did, in fact, claim that he had taken one of her favorite peep stones and refused to return it. According to Lucy Mack Smith, the Chases were very upset to learn that Joseph had found gold plates and felt he ought to share the find with them - since they had previously some kind of informal agreement.http://www.amazon.com/True-History-Joseph-Smith-ebook/dp/B00SSBDB4U/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1423500822&sr=8-1&keywords=True+history+of+Joseph+smith
Uncle Dale Posted February 12, 2015 Posted February 12, 2015 (edited) The use of peep stones, or seer stones, was quite common among the New Englanders who settled in western New York when those lands were opened for settlement following the American Revolution. That area had been the homeland of the Senecas and was rich in artifacts of all kinds. Digging for artifacts, which mostly turned out to be little valued flints and European trade goods, was a sort of mania for a while. It seems undeniable that Joseph and his neighbors made use of such stones in a hunt for supposed treasures in the old Seneca sites. The Urim and Thummin were fairly obscure Biblical references and scarcely in common use. It is not surprising that the terms were not used at the time when the plates were uncovered.In my fictional version of Joseph's life, I see him as sharing the belief in special stones and buried treasures common in his culture. The Smith's neighbors, the Chase family, were quite involved in such practices and it seems that Sally Chase, a few years older than Joseph, might have influenced his thinking. She did, in fact, claim that he had taken one of her favorite peep stones and refused to return it. According to Lucy Mack Smith, the Chases were very upset to learn that Joseph had found gold plates and felt he ought to share the find with them - since they had previously some kind of informal agreement.http://www.amazon.com/True-History-Joseph-Smith-ebook/dp/B00SSBDB4U/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1423500822&sr=8-1&keywords=True+history+of+Joseph+smith A few times I've tried doing searches, back through pre-1830newspapers -- and especially those from New York and New England.Divining rod accounts are fairly common. There may be somethinglike a fortune-telling crystal ball mentioned here and there... But published articles mentioning American peep-stones are rare;at least up until 1830. After that, practically every such occurrencein the newspapers has to do with Joseph Smith, in one way oranother. On the other hand, very early mentions of his "stone spectacles"are easy to find. The idea proved to be so unique, that newspaperwriters seemed delighted to be able to include the "interpreters"in composing their articles. I think, perhaps, there may be somecomparison made with the biblical U&T -- but can't recall of anypublished before Phelps introduced the term. If I ever find anything pre-Phelps, I'll put it on the web. Phelpshimself possessed a divining rod in his later years. Not sure ifI recall his having a stone, however. One of my distant relatives had what was called a "Scotch stone,"which she evidently used to locate lost cattle, etc. But I know solittle about her that I can't even recall the name. The problem with using such a stone to find strayed cattle is thata logical suspicion could fall upon the seer, as perhaps knowingthat location in advance, without consulting his stone. And, wasn't it Lucy Harris who suggested that Joseph use hisstone to find the "lost" Book of Lehi? How could she make sucha statement, if Smith had no stone until after the "interpreters"were taken away? Somebody really ought to write a 600-page, Quinn-style studyof these topics. Brown's "Plates of Gold" is far too "thin." UD Edited February 12, 2015 by Uncle Dale
ALarson Posted February 12, 2015 Posted February 12, 2015 (edited) A few times I've tried doing searches, back through pre-1830newspapers -- and especially those from New York and New England.Divining rod accounts are fairly common. This reminded me of reading about the "Fraternity of Rodsman" that Oliver Cowdery's Father was involved in (and also possibly Joseph Smith, Sr. according some witness's statements). What are your feelings regarding them? (Maybe this needs to be a new thread as I don't want to derail this one). Edited February 12, 2015 by ALarson
Uncle Dale Posted February 12, 2015 Posted February 12, 2015 This reminded me of reading about the "Fraternity of Rodsman" that Oliver Cowdery's Father was involved in (and also possibly Joseph Smith, Sr. according some witness's statements). What are your feelings regarding them? (Maybe this needs to be a new thread as I don't want to derail this one). Yeah -- we need a thread here discussing whetheror not Joseph Smith, Jr. and Joseph Smith, Sr. everused divining rods -- same for Oliver and his father. I once asked a question along these lines to Grant McMurray,when he was the church librarian, in the RLDS Auditorium --"Certainly not!" was his answer. -- So, on the Reorganized side,at least, there are those sorts of denials concerning diviningrods and early Mormonism. UD
Robert F. Smith Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 ...................................................................... ....................................................... Nor will therebe any last days gathering of Lamanites, Ephraimites andLost Tribeites in Jackson County, Missouri (causeway or not)......................................................................................... We have that on your august authority, Dale? I used to meet many prophets in Jackson County in the old days, and even the ones on thorazine used to have prophecies for me.
Robert F. Smith Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 Yeah -- we need a thread here discussing whetheror not Joseph Smith, Jr. and Joseph Smith, Sr. everused divining rods -- same for Oliver and his father. I once asked a question along these lines to Grant McMurray,when he was the church librarian, in the RLDS Auditorium --"Certainly not!" was his answer. -- So, on the Reorganized side,at least, there are those sorts of denials concerning diviningrods and early Mormonism. UDGrant and I discussed that with his boss Richard Howard one day there in the Auditorium, and Richard directed us to Ludlum, so we were well informed on the WoodScrape Affair and on the various future Mormons who had been using such paraphernalia. Joseph taught that some had an ability with rods, and others with stones. You may be confusing the two separate specialties. By the way, some people assert that Brigham Young "witched" the location for the Salt Lake Temple with Oliver's rod. Does that scandalize you? 1
Robert F. Smith Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 ..................................................................................... And, wasn't it Lucy Harris who suggested that Joseph use hisstone to find the "lost" Book of Lehi? How could she make sucha statement, if Smith had no stone until after the "interpreters"were taken away? Somebody really ought to write a 600-page, Quinn-style studyof these topics. Brown's "Plates of Gold" is far too "thin." UDThere you go again ignoring all the scholarship which has shown that the stones came first, and the interpreters later. You might want to take a look at the extensive research materials gathered by Michael Marquardt and deposited in the Univ. of Utah Library (accn0900, http://user.xmission.com/~research/mormonpdf/hmmcollection0900.pdf ). You will find all the arcane literature gathered for you there. No need to go out digging on your own.
Uncle Dale Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 There you go again ignoring all the scholarship which has shown that the stones came first, and the interpreters later. You might want to take a look at the extensive research materials gathered by Michael Marquardt and deposited in the Univ. of Utah Library (accn0900, http://user.xmission.com/~research/mormonpdf/hmmcollection0900.pdf ). You will find all the arcane literature gathered for you there. No need to go out digging on your own. Easier to just ask Mike next time he calls. But, if historians and social anthropologists nowadaysaccept Mormon "scholarship" on oracles, then of courseI must bend to that wind. Tell me the truth -- was it a divining rod or a stone that Brighamdisplayed in St. George? And was it a divining rod or a stone thathe used to fengshui the Deseret holy of holies? As for Ludlum and friends (been there; done that) we can review... Yes -- we need a thread on divining rods -- to sort this out. UD
Recommended Posts