california boy Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Well the kid was 6 days old after all. Probably about time he learned the lesson of discrimination against gays. He will learn soon enough that religion has a very ugly side to it that is as old as religion itself. 1
thesometimesaint Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Cry me a river. In both cases the homosexual couples file a law suit against someone who refused to serve them for religious reasons because they thought he should just serve them anyway, as if it doesn't matter how the service provider feels. They just want what they want and they couldn't care less about what the service providers want. They all thought the service providers should be penalized for following his religion.Just more examples of how homosexuals are when they don't get what they want. :o
tonie Posted February 19, 2015 Author Posted February 19, 2015 (edited) Cry me a river. In both cases the homosexual couples file a law suit against someone who refused to serve them for religious reasons because they thought he should just serve them anyway, as if it doesn't matter how the service provider feels. They just want what they want and they couldn't care less about what the service providers want. They all thought the service providers should be penalized for following his religion.Just more examples of how homosexuals are when they don't get what they want. Cry me a river. In Santa Fe, Texas, year 2000, a Mormon filed a law suit about someone who just wanted to prayer for religious reasons - whose praying was support by a voice of the people (The person praying was an elected Chaplain). The Momron thought the prayer should not be allowed, as if it doesn't matter how the person praying feels, nor does it matter about the will of the people. The Mormon just wanted what she wanted and couldn't care less about what the people wanted nor what the person praying wanted. The Mormon thought the person praying should be prohibited for following his religion.Just another example of how Mormons are when they don't get what they want. Edited February 19, 2015 by tonie
Ahab Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Cry me a river.In Santa Fe, Texas, year 2000, a Mormon filed a law suit about someone who just wanted to prayer for religious reasons - whose praying was support by a voice of the people (The person praying was an elected Chaplain). The Momron thought the prayer should not be allowed, as if it doesn't matter how the person praying feels, nor does it matter about the will of the people. The Mormon just wanted what she wanted and couldn't care less about what the people wanted nor what the person praying wanted. The Mormon thought the person praying should be prohibited for following his religion.Just another example of how Mormons are when they don't get what they want.Any Mormon who doesn't want anyone to pray to God is a bad Mormon and should be treated the way I would treat a gay couple who wouldn't want someone to pray to God either. 1
Daniel2 Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 (edited) Cry me a river. In both cases the homosexual couples file a law suit against someone who refused to serve them for religious reasons because they thought he should just serve them anyway, as if it doesn't matter how the service provider feels. They just want what they want and they couldn't care less about what the service providers want. They all thought the service providers should be penalized for following his religion.Just more examples of how homosexuals are when they don't get what they want.Thanks for proving my points, Ahab, and disproving Pahoran's response to my comments on the articles.Unfortunately, it's clear from both your and Pahoran's comments that you actually didn't even bother to read the articles I posted, because you presume two lawsuits were filed--and that isn't even the case.Since you couldnt be bothered to actually read the facts, I'll summarize: The lesbian couple who's 6-day-old baby was refused service by the pediatrician didn't even file a lawsuit, and the gay couple refused flowers only sued for a whopping $7.91--the cost to drive to another florist. It was the state that is pressing charges for up to the full fine the florist for violating anti-discrimination laws.It's not surprising that you didn't even bother to read them, but instead rushed to pre-judge, condemn, and slander the gay and lesbian couples for being self-centered and litigious ... but still unfortunate.I believe Christ has something to say about beams and motes that may be applicable... Edited February 19, 2015 by Daniel2
Ahab Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Thanks for proving my point, Ahab, and disproving Pahoran response to my comments on the articles.Unfortunately, it's clear from both your and Pahoran comments that you actually didn't even read the articles I posted, because you presume two lawsuits were filed--and that isn't even the case. Since you couldnt be bothered to actually read the facts, I'll summarize: The lesbian couple who's 6 day old baby was refused service by the pediatrician didn't even file a lawsuit, and the gay couple refused flowers only sued for a whopping $7.50--the cost to drive to another florist. It was the state that is pressing charges to fine the florist for violating anti-discrimination laws.It's not surprising that you didn't even bother to read them, and instead rushed to prejudice and slander the gay and lesbian couples... but still unfortunate.Okay so they both just reported what happened to the media instead of just letting it go. It amounts to the same thing. Someone who refuses to do something for a homosexual based on religious/moral/conscientious objections can pretty much expect the homosexual to make a big fuss about it instead of compassionately understanding and agreeing that someone should not do what they don't feel right about doing, because as seen from these examples, homosexuals don't really care about anyone's conscientious objections when they stand in the way of what they want.
Daniel2 Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 (edited) Okay so they both just reported what happened to the media instead of just letting it go. It amounts to the same thing. Someone who refuses to do something for a homosexual based on religious/moral/conscientious objections can pretty much expect the homosexual to make a big fuss about it instead of compassionately understanding and agreeing that someone should not do what they don't feel right about doing, because as seen from these examples, homosexuals don't really care about anyone's conscientious objections when they stand in the way of what they want.So... you belive it's OK for businesses to break the law....? No one should report violations of law....?How DARE those selfish gays and lesbians demand the same, equal dignity, respect, and application of anti-discrimination laws that are already applied to religious, Mormon customers, instead of compassionately understanding and agreeing that someone should not do what they don't feel right about doing (i.e. baking a cake for an abominable same-sex marriage)...?!?!?!!?! The SHOCK! The HORROR!How DARE those seflish interracial couples demand the same, equal dignity, respect, and application of anti-discrimination laws that are already applied to white customers, instead of compassionately understanding and agreeing that someone should not do what they don't feel right about doing (i.e. baking a cake for an abominable interracial marriage)....?!?!?!?!?!?!How DARE those selfish women demand the same dignity, respect, and hiring considerations and equal pay of anti-discrimination laws that are already applied to men, instead of compassionately understanding and agreeing with someone should not do what they don't feel right about doing (i.e. hiring a woman for an at-work job at equal pay, instead of staying at home and caring for her children, as the hiring manager's religious beliefs dictate)....?!?!?!?!!?!Expecting equality..... SHOCK!!!! HORROR!!!! Un-AMERICAN!!!!!!!!! Edited February 19, 2015 by Daniel2
thesometimesaint Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Okay so they both just reported what happened to the media instead of just letting it go. It amounts to the same thing. Someone who refuses to do something for a homosexual based on religious/moral/conscientious objections can pretty much expect the homosexual to make a big fuss about it instead of compassionately understanding and agreeing that someone should not do what they don't feel right about doing, because as seen from these examples, homosexuals don't really care about anyone's conscientious objections when they stand in the way of what they want. Say I passionately religiously/morally/conscientiously object to and hate traffic laws. I therefore don't have to obey them. If a legal representative of the state calls me on it. They are violating my freedom of religion rights. They don't care about my conscientious objections to traffic laws when they stand in the way of what I want.
KevinG Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 The Santa Fe Texas case...The public prayers were sectarian in nature and damning others to hell, including the Mormons. Perhaps it is a very apt parallel for how we should be treating others who disagree with our religious sensitivities?
Daniel2 Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 Drama queen much?My sentiments, exactly.You have to obey the law--even anti-discrimination laws--even when you don't want to.Now.... YOU cry a river, build a bridge, and get over it.
KevinG Posted February 19, 2015 Posted February 19, 2015 No one has to obey laws, temporal or eternal. We just can't pick and choose the consequences we want. On that more uplifting note this thread is locked for too much brawling. 1
Recommended Posts