The Nehor

“Dozens of people were crushed by prayers this morning……”

So when I idly came up with a sophisticated plan for world domination before laughing it off I was moved to the same tier as this guy. I like him now and want to be his friend.

The false dichotomy. You either follow the divine laws on sex or you end up having nightly orgies. There is no middle ground. This goes all the way back to the Bible.

There is probably something behind this. Reportedly sometime in 2026 or 2027 the Church has to renew their trademark. They may have a bit of a problem since they have actively been renaming or retiring a lot of the initiatives and uses of the word “Mormon” they used in previous renewals. You can’t claim copyright if you aren’t actively using the trademark. Another bit of evidence is that you are actively protecting your trademark. My guess is that this is why the Church is doing this. To prove they are defending it.

If it was written during the Maccabean Revolt as many believe I expect the best identification would be the successor kingdoms. At this point the Seleucids were the ones doing a lot of the stuff in the book of Daniel like violating the temple and dedicating it to Zeus.

Thank you for asking. It was excruciatingly painful.

Dan McClellan ticks off just about everybody.

Potato, potahto.

Is posting one word per line some kind of Nazi identifier thing?

I would be glad to hear a rebuttal on where I am wrong. Also you can follow through on your declarations that you are going to ignore me any time you like. Not sure what is holding you back. Maybe I am just too entertaining? Boredom? The palpable sexual tension between us? A need to seethe in rage at someone? Satan keeps tempting you to? Reading my posts is so boring it helps you sleep? Whatever need it is that I am meeting, you are welcome.

How about instead of being an ‘enlightened centrist’ that intuitively assumes the truth must be smack dab in the middle we find out what is actually correct? The idea that both sides of any debate are psychopathic partisans and can be safely dismissed on that basis is toxic. Instead we should be dismissing people on the basis of them being liars and charlatans and similar things of that nature after we determine they are wrong. Appealing to “both sides equally bad” arguments is often a confession that the person isn’t very secure about where they stand. They have a vague sense that their case is shoddy so it is easiest to make everyone into villains to even the playing field. However, this is just more psychology and figuring out why someone is wrong is best done after you determine that they are actually wrong. Otherwise you slip into Bulverism.

Dan McClellan.

And unsurprisingly those that venerate him are right of center members. Bulverism, the true equalizer of all viewpoints. “You believe that because you are XXXXXXX” It dulls the intellect, places reason below speculative psychology, and C.S. Lewis thought it could doom the world.

Bah, the idea that the Saints of God could be duped by an ignorant, confused, and deluded demagogue that flatters them and their worldview is absolutely ludicrous.

Abuse victims often rationalize away the abuse at first or blame themselves. That is not as vindicating as it sounds.

Pretty much all of them weren’t young earth creationists.

Something about underage parties on an island somewhere? Something about that rings a bell.

False dichotomy. Set the bar so high for the ‘bad’ outcome and your favored ‘good’ outcome becomes probable by default. I don’t see how his countersuits are likely to expose him. Discovery is happening with or without the countersuits. This is just totally wrong. Seriously, read the text exchanges. He wasn’t training anyone to act like a “sexual pervert”. The stuff he was doing was all very vanilla and was ostensibly entirely about him and the woman being able to convince people they were a couple. He was creepily pressing for doing more things to supposedly be better at faking this bond. As a certified sexual pervert I can say the stuff they were doing wouldn’t make her ready even for the ethical side of the kink world. There was nothing about getting her to act like a predator. And, of course, it is nonsensically stupid to use this ruse in the first place. You don’t have to have a romantic partner to set up a child predator party. He only did this so he could do this fake flirting thing. I have no idea how far he planned on taking it. Even if it didn’t go all the way guys like Ballard feed on the attention and being desired. My guess if he could get them to go all the way they would. The only times they were degraded and humiliated were with him. Not in the actual sting. That should show exactly how necessary it was. It may be time for serious self-examination if you are defending predatory sex pest behavior as a necessary evil to achieve a “higher good”. It is stupid and morally reprehensible. “Thou shalt not commit adultery or lust after a woman in your heart unless it is part of unnecessary preparatory method acting for a hamfisted sex trafficking sting that won’t put a dent in actual sex trafficking.” -Jesus (probably)

Oops, responding to old stuff. Probably shouldn’t be posting at 3 in the morning.

Sure you mean a MOTCOJCOLDSINO (member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in name only)

Yeah, that tends to be what he tends to get stern about on his YouTube channel. He tends to be helpful when answering sincere questions, matter of fact when correcting wrong stuff, and biting when he think the person is misusing the Bible to punch down at the marginalized or to support scumbags.

She defended the “couples ruse” as a legitimate tactic. For this reason she was a defendant in the lawsuit for a while but the judge removed her with prejudice because the evidence against her was not enough to pursue a case. So it seems she was okay with this deception and possibly with her husband taking other women to tantric yoga, getting couple ‘massages’ with sex workers, and these women giving her husband lap dances, and all the rest. Maybe this was an attempt to protect her husband. Maybe she was complicit. Maybe she was happy with anything that would keep her husband away from her. Maybe she was just scared. I don’t know.

From what I have read the bulk of scholars think the 24 hour time period is the more likely. It can mean either but from what I can tell the bulk believe that in this context the more likely meaning is within 24 hours. It is not a certainty though.

That is a theory that is only possibly valid if certain speculative forms of physics are true. It recently got popular because the rotation of galaxies matches to a degree what this theory would require. Of course there are also lots of other possible explanations. It makes for good clickbait though.