Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Intense Conversation with a Mormon: Trigger Warning --> James White


Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=james+white+intense+conversation&docid=608018753205309065&mid=C28BA9DB567281CE1412C28BA9DB567281CE1412&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

Yes, I used Bing. 

No, I haven't watched this all the way through. 

Watching now. 

I am thus far impressed with James White's demeanor in this particular, specific debate. Believe it or not, I have some problems with James White. I think he has, at times, gone off the rails. 

At any rate, this young Mormon is acquitting himself quite well, thus far. 

Cheers!

 

 

Posted

re: esoteric doctrine (aka exaltation of Heavenly Father)

"We don't have much information about it. So everything is sort of a suggested kind of theory."

Yes, this is my bumpkin version of live-tweeting. 

 

Posted

JW: Is the KFD esoteric doctrine?

M (aka The Mormon -- gotta get his name): You can be unsure about KFD and still be a Mormon-in-good-standing. (<-- that's a synopsis; check it out for yourself)

 

 

Posted

Podcast host: Name one book on your shelf about the Trinity. 

M: something by Tim Keller*

* Presbyterian popularizer at best. 

Posted

Wow. Totally misread M. I was thinking binitarianism === Father, Son. M is excluding Son from pre-NT. 

Disagree.

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, cksalmon said:

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=james+white+intense+conversation&amp;docid=608018753205309065&amp;mid=C28BA9DB567281CE1412C28BA9DB567281CE1412&amp;view=detail&amp;FORM=VIRE

Yes, I used Bing. 

No, I haven't watched this all the way through. 

Watching now. 

I am thus far impressed with James White's demeanor in this particular, specific debate. Believe it or not, I have some problems with James White. I think he has, at times, gone off the rails. 

At any rate, this young Mormon is acquitting himself quite well, thus far. 

Cheers!

 

 

I agree, he definitely doesn't back down. And like he mentions, he was Protestant until the age 15, so grew up studying the Bible, I'm thinking, which helps a ton in his arguments. 

But too bad they concentrated the majority of the time on the Trinity, and the archeology in the BoM. 

Edited by Tacenda
Posted
18 hours ago, cksalmon said:

I am thus far impressed with James White's demeanor in this particular, specific debate. Believe it or not, I have some problems with James White. I think he has, at times, gone off the rails. \

James White is a man who makes his profession by bearing false witness to the people he preaches to (via knowingly and purposely misrepresenting other people's beliefs).  He might put one sheets clothing very nicely, but a liar is always that.  This particular "debate" is no different: he is just like the Pharisees of old-- trying to trick the other person with fancy word games and misrepresentation. 

The LDS dude is one of the guys from YouTube show "Saints Unscripted" (formally known as "3 Mormons").  I have always liked his work.

Posted
18 hours ago, cksalmon said:

re: esoteric doctrine (aka exaltation of Heavenly Father)

"We don't have much information about it. So everything is sort of a suggested kind of theory."

Personally, I feel that we have plenty to go on for the exaltation of Heavenly Father, but that the brethern had to back down from it due to a golden-calf moment. That's not a knock against the brethern.

Posted
7 hours ago, Jane_Doe said:

James White is a man who makes his profession by bearing false witness to the people he preaches to (via knowingly and purposely misrepresenting other people's beliefs).  He might put one sheets clothing very nicely, but a liar is always that.  This particular "debate" is no different: he is just like the Pharisees of old-- trying to trick the other person with fancy word games and misrepresentation. 

The LDS dude is one of the guys from YouTube show "Saints Unscripted" (formally known as "3 Mormons").  I have always liked his work.

The later portions of this debate were posted in another thread.

JW does misrepresent the beliefs of others (ok, he lies about them).  He claims to "know" LDS doctrine and history, yet he doesn't act like it. 

Also, either he is not really familiar with Hebrew OR he is willing to let his debating partner misrepresent it.  Letting a false information stand without correction is to perpetrate a deception. 

I think the "kid" did well, but he let a few false premises get introduced without question. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...