Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Mitt Romney Speaking About Mormon Faith (Off The Air)


Nathair/|\

Recommended Posts

Posted

So.... is it correct to presume that people who hold a certain belief (or experience those beliefs) always "know more" about those beliefs than someone who does not personally share or personally experience those beliefs?

Is this a joke question? "Knowing more " isn't mere facts that you read in a book but experiencing living one's religion, and particularly in a church that believes in being guided by the Holy Spirit.

Posted

Nah, I'd agree with Libs. Romeny reacted a bit too hotly. Now whether that was justified or not, I do not know (for all I know there could be a good reason for it). But it's going to be spinned that way, I am guessing.

Posted

Nah, I'd agree with Libs. Romeny reacted a bit too hotly. Now whether that was justified or not, I do not know (for all I know there could be a good reason for it). But it's going to be spinned that way, I am guessing.

I agree, he is acting very frustrated. Now maybe if he could get back the mindset of a bishop...

Posted

I agree, he is acting very frustrated. Now maybe if he could get back the mindset of a bishop...

And there is a problem with acting frustrated with someone who isn't listening and trying to tell you what you believe?

Posted

Is this a joke question? "Knowing more " isn't mere facts that you read in a book but experiencing living one's religion, and particularly in a church that believes in being guided by the Holy Spirit.

I appreciate those that weighed in (blackstrap, calmoriah, libs, sometimesaint, ERayR, Deborah…) with the assumption that those that live a certain lifestyle are far more likely to know about that lifestyle than someone else who hasn't, and that Romney may have been justified in feeling slightly indignant with an apparently arrogant interviewer.

I wish more people felt that way. Strangely, more often that not, that doesn't seem to be a universally-held assumption on this board regarding non-LDS "lifestyles". That seems like a double-standard, to me.

Daniel2

Do not derail the thread.

Posted

And there is a problem with acting frustrated with someone who isn't listening and trying to tell you what you believe?

Well, normally there isn't, the thing is, this was gonna be put on media... so I think he mighta been a little more careful.

Still, this whole podcast doesn't really matter all that much to me. I'm sure he had plenty of reason for frustration, yeah, so it's not really going to make me look at him any worse or anything.

Posted

The thing is, there is a lot of past moments like that, with Romney. Patience doesn't seem to be one of his virtues. I really don't mean that as harshly as it is probably going to sound. It's not one of my virtues, either. But, I have to say that does kind of concern me, if we're talking leader of one of the largest nations in the world.

Daniel, I understand what you're saying about members not always knowing more than outsiders. I don't think that is, probably, the case, with Mitt Romney, but it certainly can be a fact. I ran into critics, soon after my baptism into the church, who definitely knew a lot more about the church, than I did. But, someone like Romney, who is a lifetime member and served as both a Bishop and Stake President, probably knows his religion pretty well.

Posted

Eh, I'd have to disagree there Libs. I have seen times where Romney is quite patient. I think the show just pushed him past his limit for that one.

Posted

Oh sure, I know he is not like that all the time. His first couple of debate performances, for example, were very good and he was very controlled.

Posted

I don't really think that is true. Thinking of Gandhi, for one...

I think truly great men are generally very thoughtful men...not impulsive and hot headed.

He had a temper, just noa public one. In the movie about his life he once took his wife and attempted to physically throw her out of his home.
Posted

What we need is someone who occasionally becomes impatient and will let the other side know that is not the way it is.

Posted

I'm sure Romney knows more about his own faith, but what bothers me about the interaction is his appearance of being somewhat of a hot head. He really could have tried to explain all of that in a much more calm (and kind) tone. The other guy wasn't really going after him. He was open to what he had to say. Romney seems to get frustrated with people very easily. I've noticed that in many of his interactions.

Actually, I've noticed that he tends to be calm and level-headed. In the three debates with Obama, our dear President came out and stated some things that were real zingers in terms of misrepresentation (e.g. 5 trillion dollar tax-cut), that Romney repeatedly called him on, without getting too particularly upset about. In the case of the 5 trillion dollar thing, if it had been me I think I would have hit the roof after the umpteenth time the President stated it. So, I credit him with more calmness than you do.

And as to this little video, he refers several times to on-air incidents that we are not made parties to, so what is he reacting to, exactly? Questions in the nature of "Have you stopped beating your wife?"

Posted

Oh sure, I know he is not like that all the time. His first couple of debate performances, for example, were very good and he was very controlled.

Nah, I don't mean even that... I mean he is rarely like that. To be honest, that's the first time I've seen him get that frustrated.

Posted

I have no problem with telling people exactly what I believe, but we should always use the maximum decorum while doing it.

A diplomat is someone with the ability to tell someone else to go He(double Hockey Sticks), and them wanting to pack their bags. ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...