smac97 Posted October 11 Posted October 11 I just watched this YouTube video and found it interesting: Warning: The video includes a spoiler to the Green Lantern TV show, if that matters. A Grok summary: Quote The speaker sees a consistent pattern in recent DC, Marvel, and other franchise storytelling: serious wrongdoing goes unpunished, villains are elevated into protagonists, and traditional heroes are diminished. Lack of accountability. In Lanterns, the woman who kills Hal Jordan faces no real consequences; living with guilt is treated as sufficient. In WandaVision, Wanda enslaves and mentally tortures an entire town to manage her grief, then leaves without justice; Monica Rambeau’s response is sympathy for what Wanda “sacrificed.” In Spider-Man: Brand New Day, Jean Grey possesses innocents, endangers them, and tries to kill MJ, then simply boards a bus while Peter offers friendship. The speaker notes that the characters receiving this treatment are women and finds the lack of punitive consequences extraordinary—functionally, they get away with it. Villain-centered stories. Studios are giving villains their own films (Deathstroke and Bane, Clayface, the Joker films, Venom). The speaker argues that characters whose identity depends on opposing a hero lose their dramatic force when made the protagonist, and that the trend fits a broader moral relativism in which “it’s complicated” replaces clear good and evil. Tolkien, he says, was unambiguous; Hollywood treats absolute evil as too simplistic, which in practice makes allowances for malice. Decline of heroes and institutions. Classic hero arcs (Spider-Man learning responsibility, Tony Stark and Thor being humbled) are contrasted with newer protagonists (Captain Marvel, Rey) who are already perfect and merely held back by external forces. At the same time, established heroes are portrayed as broken, cynical, or sidelined: Hal Jordan, Nick Fury, Han Solo, Luke Skywalker, Picard, Indiana Jones. Institutions that once embodied moral standards (Starfleet, the Jedi) are now shown as corrupt or compromised. The result, the speaker argues, is a loss of conviction about good and evil. He ties the three trends together: unpunished evil, the rise of the villain as anti-hero, and the disempowerment of heroes and the institutions around them. Citing Breitbart that politics is downstream from culture, he worries that these stories fail to give audiences clear morality plays and instead normalize moral inversion. He leaves open whether the pattern is coincidence or agenda, and invites viewer comment. A few thoughts/questions: 1. Does this guy have a point? I think he does, but I'm interested in hearing other perspectives. 2. Why do you think this is happening? 3. Is this important? My three favorite fictional heroes are Gandalf, Captain America and Atticus Finch. Two of the three are "pop culture" guys. Thanks, -Smac 1
Calm Posted October 11 Posted October 11 (edited) I would have to watch or rewatch with this in mind to give an accurate and detailed response. It’s been too long since I watched superhero movies. They are not very interesting these days, pretty shallow and unsurprising, too dependent on special effects and not decent dialogue or story. Having said that, going from memory, he has highly simplified in the cases I know about. I might agree with him. I find the Harry Potter movies boring in part because of the way Harry’s breaking the rules is treated. It seems to me he thinks it’s important to put experience and people in a black and white frame to teach morality. I don’t see the female heroes as perfect and limited only by circumstance at the beginning with no actual internal growth. Maybe he is missing subtleties because he isn’t looking for them. Then there is the whole need for punishment. What does that serve? Fear of punishment can teach one to look outside oneself to control one’s behaviour. Feeling responsibility and guilt otoh, that goes with you everywhere. I wonder if he is Christian. If so, has he missed the whole forgiveness arc in the New Testament? Plus how does society punish someone who they are essentially incapable of punishing? Any punishment must be self inflicted at that point, even if it’s sitting in a cell because they choose to submit. What would be punishment for someone with such mental powers. And better than punishment anyway is a life of redemption, something that gives rather than takes away as punishment does. Whether that actually happens or not I can’t remember or don’t know. Edited October 11 by Calm
bluebell Posted Monday at 02:18 AM Posted Monday at 02:18 AM 6 hours ago, smac97 said: I just watched this YouTube video and found it interesting: Warning: The video includes a spoiler to the Green Lantern TV show, if that matters. A Grok summary: A few thoughts/questions: 1. Does this guy have a point? I think he does, but I'm interested in hearing other perspectives. 2. Why do you think this is happening? 3. Is this important? My three favorite fictional heroes are Gandalf, Captain America and Atticus Finch. Two of the three are "pop culture" guys. Thanks, -Smac I haven't watched the video but I've thought the same before so I think he does have a point (in what you've described him saying). Yes, we are currently in a culture that is embracing turning villains into victims and heroes into villains in our entertainment. I remember watching the series Supernatural (silly fun) and noticing that the angels were almost always the bad guys and the demons (including the "king of hell"--not lucifer) were the good guys. I think we would be dumb to think that being immersed in that kind of entertainment doesn't have an impact on how we view the world and who we are willing to give the benefit of the doubt to and who we aren't. 4
the narrator Posted Tuesday at 05:36 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:36 PM On 10/11/2026 at 1:56 PM, Calm said: It seems to me he thinks it’s important to put experience and people in a black and white frame to teach morality. Dude better stay away from anime then. One thing I love about a lot of anime is that it often roots its notions of good and bad in Buddhism, such that villains are often presented with backstories of trauma that explain why they became the way they are, and the heroes are often very sympathetic to that fact. In Demon Slayer, for example, the lead Tanjiro is often in tears after killing a demon while in despair over the pain and sorrow that resulted in a person becoming a demon. The world isn't black and white, and so some people need to stop whining when media is acknowledging that. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now