Ahab Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 8 minutes ago, Gray said: Math is not your friend, Ahab. If it's between a man and a woman, then polygamy is out. Heh, no, not when we're talking about the sexual relations part of that marriage. Anyway, I am done now with trying to explain this to you. Think what you want.
Gray Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 (edited) 38 minutes ago, Ahab said: Heh, no, not when we're talking about the sexual relations part of that marriage. Anyway, I am done now with trying to explain this to you. Think what you want. It doesn't matter either way. The relationship is with multiple women, doesn't matter that the sexual component is sequential and not simultaneous. But that's kind of a bizarre argument, boiling marriage down to just sex. Sex is just a small part of marriage. Edited March 22, 2017 by Gray
Ahab Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 11 minutes ago, Gray said: ...doesn't matter that the sexual component is sequential and not simultaneous. Heh, you are a hoot! Imagine all of the wives hearing that from their one husband, with all of the wives being virtuous, modest women! But you may not understand that either.
Gray Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, Ahab said: Heh, you are a hoot! Imagine all of the wives hearing that from their one husband, with all of the wives being virtuous, modest women! But you may not understand that either. With your argument, any serial adulterer could claim to be a monogamist. "I'm in a one man, one woman relationship!"
Recommended Posts