aprorianalysis Posted December 4, 2016 Posted December 4, 2016 A posit, in contrast, is assumed on the basis that it will (hopefully) prove to be true. A possible explanation of how something happened is a posit. If you observe (for example) that economic inflation is occurring, you could posit that increasing wages is driving it, and then set out to collect facts to prove or disprove that posit. As a member, we are hopeful that when full revelation is forth coming that it is posit, in contrast to just following scriptures at length to which is subjective as the information is written down. No man can not be perfect, translating words into concepts which are both fundamentally flawed by an etymology and by definition. We can not search for truth in words, basically as the 2600 years ago Greeks, supposed by their philosophical formed in 600 BC, that beauty or the essence of beauty was very abstract. So too is the further evolution of the external world in very the same manner we are yes, more scientific, more technological advanced in some ways, have a greater degree of comforting goods and services in a material age of plenty. However, there is a widening gap of intolerance and yes what is described by religionist that we are in are economic attitudes towards the poor and the mass of starving individuals a group of doctrines that are trying to excuse acting as psychotropic influences on religious groups. However, as we are all looking at service motives. Yes, they seem to point at the mixed service response as they I see it. We have it backward should be a more committed to love is the desire to do good to others. It is not the action, that which is in question it is the action. The desire is worthy of reexamining, to what is loving service? Therefore does man languish in wrong motives to think that group social gathering for a bake sale in a promoted of organized religious activities. Thus the profit motive, lending our means to so call solve some sort of social justice is all you hear about, the service evolving platform is just another, proselyting tool. Take to extremes and is not a loving service at all. Where is the proper brake on motivation except in the differentiating of what service is and is not. Well, this is understandable an easier task to philosophically look at the way in which we look at other person and how to say what we desire them to feel what love or service is. If true worship if it is anonymous and depicted with not a name of an organization stamped on its soul. Then true service must be an individual thing with god and oneself as the center of its offerings. So how could it be a huge group thing. Any comments possible understanding of this being the case that to love is to help others in need could be faulty idealism. Furthermore, we are mistakenly replacing new unleashing of false idealism when we are have not made any significant sense of the subject in question.
Calm Posted December 4, 2016 Posted December 4, 2016 (edited) "No man can not be perfect" Is this what you really mean to say? As in double negative makes a positive so you are really saying 'all men are perfect'. Or did you mean "no, man cannot be perfect" or "no man can be perfect"? Again, please proof your posts and if you are doing it already, do it more. Most of them are unintelligible the way you are writing them...which is a pity as they seem like they would be interesting if they could be understood if we didn't have to guess so much what you really meant. Edited December 4, 2016 by Calm
Recommended Posts