UtahTexan Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 10 minutes ago, Teancum said: Really? You bash my beliefs that certain alleged relations from JS were not from God. You bash other Christian sects by accepting LDS claims as truth. You bash. Most who disagree with you by stating they prove your fantastical claims as false. it is really quite simple. I have never bashed them....I have simply asked you to support your claims. Please...there is no need to deflect from your failures. As to bashing other sects? Nope. My belief is that who has salvation is above my pay grade and Heavenly Father will do what He will do. So...big surprise.......wrong again Poster removed
Teancum Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 3 minutes ago, CountryBoy said: I have never bashed them....I have simply asked you to support your claims. Please...there is no need to deflect from your failures. As to bashing other sects? Nope. My belief is that who has salvation is above my pay grade and Heavenly Father will do what He will do. So...big surprise.......wrong again So you accept the doctrines about God from historic Chistianity. You know, those whose creed Jospeph claimed God told him were corrupt.
Johnnie Cake Posted July 13, 2016 Author Posted July 13, 2016 2 hours ago, CountryBoy said: Thanks! And thanks for admitting you cannot substantiate the quote If that makes you feel better... Your welcome
Robert F. Smith Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 On 7/11/2016 at 2:24 PM, Buckeye said: You missed the point of Cinepro's comment. He was giving the same treatment to the Quincy quote that many apologetics give to Joseph Smith's account of the first vision: i.e., portraying the latest version as more accurate than earlier accounts. In doing so, Cinepro wasn't so much supporting the accuracy of Quincy's quote as demonstrating the unreliability of the official version of the first vision (the latest version, canonized in the POGP,)and also showing how LDS apologetics often reverse arguments when it suites their interests. Yeh, them cussed Mormon apologists (or "apologetics"), always lying when it suits their interests. No need to become engaged in substantive inquiry. Everything has already been decided. Nothing to see here, move along.
Recommended Posts