theanthrofox Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 "MormonThink has been produced primarily by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who are interested in the historical accuracy of the church and how it is being taught to its members and portrayed in the media.There is a lot of misinformation on the LDS Church that is presented by both critics and defenders of the faith - particularly on the Internet. We present both viewpoints fairly and let the reader decide.Please start by reading the [removed]." Thread closed. Do not link to sites with temple content.
theanthrofox Posted December 3, 2013 Author Posted December 3, 2013 ..interested to know your thoughts...
bluebell Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 Yes, it's been discussed here on and off for years. Opinions generally depend on who you are asking.
Calm Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 http://en.fairmormon.org/Criticism_of_Mormonism/Websites/MormonThinkIt is also a site that contains temple content, perhaps you should go read the board rules again....
EllenMaksoud Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 ..interested to know your thoughts...I have visited there before but my spirit quickly warned me off. I think they are as bad as the angry bearded man from SLC.
theanthrofox Posted December 3, 2013 Author Posted December 3, 2013 I have visited there before but my spirit quickly warned me off. I think they are as bad as the angry bearded man from SLC. interesting...why do you think they are bad? are they getting the wrong picture or something?
EllenMaksoud Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 interesting...why do you think they are bad? are they getting the wrong picture or something?OK, I have been a member less than 2 years, and have been "burned" before. I am not sure why you would wish to hang with scorners. Think about Proverbs 15:12. perhaps. Even this site, while relatively safe has had folks that will give you bad information. Being so grateful for the church makes me pretty cautious.
halconero Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 interesting...why do you think they are bad? are they getting the wrong picture or something?It's the cloak and dagger act. The last few editors were most definitely not members. They represent themselves as active members so as to draw people in. 2
theanthrofox Posted December 3, 2013 Author Posted December 3, 2013 okay that's interesting. do you think their intention is actually to try and secretly hurt the church? Do they raise good points?
halconero Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 Most definitely. It's not even that deep of a secret. The current editor has explicitly said that he has some big surprise that he claims will bring down many in the church.If by good points you mean actual facts, then the answer is yes. Those facts, however, are mixed with a good dose of insinuation, circumstantial evidence, and outright speculation. 1
Recommended Posts