Olavarria Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Alma 49: 24 24) There were about fifty who were wounded, who had been exposed to the arrows of the Lamanites through the pass, but they were shielded by their shields, and their breastplates, and their head-plates, insomuch that their wounds were upon their legs, many of which were very severe. The following are codices which picture warriors with uncovered legs.
mfbukowski Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Alma 49: 24 24) There were about fifty who were wounded, who had been exposed to the arrows of the Lamanites through the pass, but they were shielded by their shields, and their breastplates, and their head-plates, insomuch that their wounds were upon their legs, many of which were very severe. The following are codices which picture warriors with uncovered legs.Bump
katherine the great Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 BumpIt seems quite reasonable to protect one's vital organs in battle while leaving limbs basically unencumbered for speed.
Confidential Informant Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Actually, I would like Brant to take a look at this codex and give his opinion. It's not the naked legs that draw my attention. It's the weapons they are holding. Is it just me, or do they look very ....sword-like?C.I.
Brant Gardner Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Actually, I would like Brant to take a look at this codex and give his opinion. It's not the naked legs that draw my attention. It's the weapons they are holding. Is it just me, or do they look very ....sword-like?There are two major types of weapons depicted. The top and second graphic have macuahuitls. The third has spears (with obsidian blades around the "blade" at the top.
Rommelator Posted December 24, 2008 Posted December 24, 2008 Is it just me, or do they look very ....sword-like?No, its not just you. The Spanish thought that they looked like swords as well.http://farms.byu.edu/publications/jbms/?vo...um=1&id=118But for some reason Joseph Smith is not allowed to call them swords in his own translation of a Mesoamerican document. Hmm....
John Larsen Posted December 24, 2008 Posted December 24, 2008 No, its not just you. The Spanish thought that they looked like swords as well.http://farms.byu.edu/publications/jbms/?vo...um=1&id=118But for some reason Joseph Smith is not allowed to call them swords in his own translation of a Mesoamerican document. Hmm.... Clearly patterned after the Sword of Laban.
Rommelator Posted December 24, 2008 Posted December 24, 2008 Clearly patterned after the Sword of Laban.Ah, true enough. But does this account for all Nephite and Lamanite weaponry? It says that Nephi did this, but what about later generations? Did they continue the practice or did they fall upon the usage of the much more convenient and possibly effective macuahuitl?For example, what about the Anti-Nephi-Lehis? Lamanites converted to the Lord who gave up their swords. As Brant Gardner pointed out, if in fact they were wielding macuahuitls then the stain of blood being removed from a wooden weapon would be all the more miraculous.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.