juliann Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Don't miss RFM's anthem.... http://www.3dweb.no/galleri/stuestolbm/bilder/anim1.swf
Bill Hamblin Posted December 12, 2005 Author Posted December 12, 2005 Hi Dan,Yes, it can. Any thesis can be definitively refuted. It
Calm Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Don't miss RFM's anthem.... http://www.3dweb.no/galleri/stuestolbm/bilder/anim1.swf Yeah! Cows are One! very intellectually enlightening....even if they aren't anatomically correct.
thesometimesaint Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 MC:http://www.jefflindsay.com/BMEvidences.shtml#mesohttp://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_BMProb2.shtmlhttp://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_metals.shtmlAny more pure assersions?
The Dude Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Mighty Curelom:I suppose terms like "cow in the tree" are a little technical for the likes of some FAIR readers.
Danite3459 Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Hey folks,There is an interesting discussion on the South Arabian etymology for irreantum herehttp://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=jbms&id=288
TrespassersW Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Mighty Curelom:Everyone here is familiar with the usual cows (some are actual cows, in fact): cattle, cows and calves, bulls, asses, horses, oxen, domestic sheep, pigs and elephants, barley, wheat, grapes, olives, swords, chariots, etc..So, let me get this straight...A "cow in the tree" is an argument that is so compelling that all other arguments can be disregarded? You then list examples of what you consider "cows in the tree", which I take to mean... arguments that are so compelling that we could disregard any other piece of evidence based solely on these.Let's take an easy one... olivesThe Book of Mormon mentions olives only in a few places: 1 Nephi 10, 1 Nephi 15, and Jacob 5-6. In each case, olives are mentioned only by someone from Jerusalem and only allegorically. So, maybe you were thinking about something else when you mentioned "olives"? Could you please point out why "olives" in the Book of Mormon represent a problem? Frankly, from what I can see, this is a completely bogus argument. And this is something that is supposed to be so compelling that we can disregard everything else?It seems to me that the only problem here is that your standard for what constitutes a "cow in the tree" argument is a little on the low side.
juliann Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I suppose terms like "cow in the tree" are a little technical for the likes of some FAIR readers. Well, I gave you the simplest source I could find, Dude. Is there something we can help you out with? The melody? The pictures?Everybody, all together for Dude! ~~~~in a tree eeee! eeeeee! ~~~~~
The Dude Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I'm in a good mood today, Juliann, so I'm laughing with you.
William the Conqueror Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 I suppose terms like "cow in the tree" are a little technical for the likes of some FAIR readers. Well, I gave you the simplest source I could find, Dude. Is there something we can help you out with? The melody? The pictures?Everybody, all together for Dude! ~~~~in a tree eeee! eeeeee! ~~~~~Sorry Dunamis, but I had to get this one in.I never saw a Purple CowI never hope to see oneBut I can tell you this for sure I'd rather see than be oneOh yes it's called the Purple CowAnd I'm the one who wrote itBut I can tell you this for sureI'll kill you if you quote it
Calm Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Apologize to all serious participants of this thread for taking it off-topic. I am actually very interested in what you have to say. It's just that after 36 hours of being awake I tend to think everything is funny.(shall we start a cow topic thread though?)
TELSTAR409 Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Apologize to all serious participants of this thread for taking it off-topic. I am actually very interested in what you have to say. It's just that after 36 hours of being awake I tend to think everything is funny.(shall we start a cow topic thread though?):::::::::grinning with anticipation::::::::::Oh yes...please do...that would be udderly divine.
Doc Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Well the first problem I see with that map proposal is this...What are the chances of anyone setting sail from the Arabian pennisula and landing on the eastern coast of the North or South American continent? Doesn't the weather typically travel from west to east?They'd have to head due south for a few thousand miles and then, after clearing the African continent, suddenly jet N/NW until they landed in what would be the future New England area. The second problem that those map proposals have is the lack of snow mentioned in the BofM. Doc~
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.