BYU Study: Pornography use at any level harms romantic relationships

[The Nehor]

2 hours ago, Hamilton Porter said:

Sorry, that's laughable

No it isn’t and you may walk back off on the condescension considering how much you have to walk back already.

[Hamilton Porter]

11 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

No it isn’t and you may walk back off on the condescension considering how much you have to walk back already.

 

11 minutes ago, The Nehor said:

No it isn’t and you may walk back off on the condescension considering how much you have to walk back already.

The effect of sample size is already reflected in the p_values. If the sample size was insufficient they would not have found a few of the variables to have statistically significant effects.

Anyone who knows statistical inference knows this. Your conclusion is indeed laughable.

 

 

 

 

[The Nehor]

2 hours ago, Hamilton Porter said:

 

The effect of sample size is already reflected in the p_values. If the sample size was insufficient they would not have found a few of the variables to have statistically significant effects.

Anyone who knows statistical inference knows this. Your conclusion is indeed laughable.

Statistical significance in one study is what is not that impressive. Anyone who knows anything about medical studies knows this.

I’m done. We’ve established there isn’t a safe drug for reducing lesbianism which was your original assertion and is what I wanted to falsify. Now we are just playing in the weeds as you try to eke out a win on some minor point and I don’t care enough to re-litigate the value of medical studies with another amateur.

[Hamilton Porter]

7 hours ago, The Nehor said:

Statistical significance in one study is what is not that impressive. Anyone who knows anything about medical studies knows this.

I’m done. We’ve established there isn’t a safe drug for reducing lesbianism which was your original assertion and is what I wanted to falsify. Now we are just playing in the weeds as you try to eke out a win on some minor point and I don’t care enough to re-litigate the value of medical studies with another amateur.

If you'd demonstrate some statistical competence instead of just calling other people amateurs you'd be more credible.

And if it's just a "minor point" you went baloney on, then why did you bring it up three times?

 

Edited April 2, 2023 by Hamilton Porter

[The Nehor]

6 hours ago, Hamilton Porter said:

If you'd demonstrate some statistical competence instead of just calling other people amateurs you'd be more credible.

Amateur wasn’t an insult. I said “another amateur” as I am also an amateur.

6 hours ago, Hamilton Porter said:

And if it's just a "minor point" you went baloney on, then why did you bring it up three times?

Because your antics amused me. Now they are boring.