JulieM Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Darren10 said: CFR please. Which part? (And, I was done with expecting you to fulfill the CFR. And you didn't, you withdrew it.) I was just teasing you with my last post too... Edited February 16, 2017 by JulieM
Darren10 Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 9 minutes ago, JulieM said: Which part? (And, I was done with expecting you to fulfill the CFR. And you didn't, you withdrew it.) I was just teasing you with my last post too... Teasing I like..but this has been a long thread. The first CFR was for my saying that I knew my post was inaccurate.
JulieM Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Darren10 said: The first CFR was for my saying that I knew my post was inaccurate. Well, you responded with "BINGO!!!!" to calm stating: "which means Darren is accepting the horse report is not accurate." Edited February 16, 2017 by JulieM
Darren10 Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, JulieM said: Well, you responded with "BINGO!!!!" to calm stating: "which means Darren is accepting the horse report is not accurate." Do you mean Calm's post when she said, "I see this post as demonstrating Darren is not insisting that what he believes Alexander first wrote in his 95/96 edition is an accurate portrayal of events. He is accepting of current scholarship changing the "perspective"." It does not say that I thought the portion of horse stealing was inaccurate when I originally posted it but that after Calm's postings on more recent publications regarding the Mountain Meadow Massacre based on more recent scholarship I am willing to alter my view (something I consistently said I was going to do and mentioned once specifically to you and riterated it to you that following more recent scholarship is perhaps better) on the matter. If this is what you were referring to, please withdraw or alter your comment. (This is probably not a topic you want to rekindle right now, I sure don't). Edited to add: This preceeded the quote you cited and places your citation into proper perspective as that latter post from Calm referred to a further progression into the dialogue regarding the MMM. "Accepting" in that quote means "has come to accept based on updated research". Edited February 16, 2017 by Darren10
Calm Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 31 minutes ago, JulieM said: Wow, you got all of that from just: "Huh, that's very interesting"? I have been reading Darren a long time, lol.
JulieM Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 12 minutes ago, Calm said: I have been reading Darren a long time, lol. Oh..ok. Got it This is really my first interaction with him. He really seems like a great guy, just a bit stubborn!!! (But aren't we all at times.)
Darren10 Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 10 hours ago, Calm said: I have been reading Darren a long time, lol. Poor you.
Darren10 Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) 10 hours ago, JulieM said: Oh..ok. Got it This is really my first interaction with him. He really seems like a great guy, just a bit stubborn!!! (But aren't we all at times.) BINGO!!! (Especially the "great guy" part) Edited February 16, 2017 by Darren10
Recommended Posts