Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Alma 43:13,14 No Others


Recommended Posts

Posted

I wonder how your game will compare to the link above?

I'll volunteer as a referee to see if any plagiarism occurs.

Plagiarism? I gave clear indication that specific points of my post were my father's views.

"[mmf = my father feels]"

Posted

Plagiarism? I gave clear indication that specific points of my post were my father's views.

"[mmf = my father feels]"

Don't worry about that cursor, I think most all of us appreciate your contributions and understand that you frequently reference your father's writings.

Posted

Or, they could be Jacob and Joseph's age and so will marry a son of Nephi, Sam, or Zoram.

I think only Zoram's children could fit that bill. Wouldn't the sons of Nephi or Sam violate Law of Moses restrictions?

I want to study the text closely and see if I can make a guess at ages of these people.

Posted

I think only Zoram's children could fit that bill. Wouldn't the sons of Nephi or Sam violate Law of Moses restrictions?

I want to study the text closely and see if I can make a guess at ages of these people.

That would mean that most of the children of Nephi and Sam would have no marriageable partners unless some of the others that followed Nephi were descendants of Ishmael.

Posted

That would mean that most of the children of Nephi and Sam would have no marriageable partners unless some of the others that followed Nephi were descendants of Ishmael.

No, I was wrong. Nieces are fine under Mosaic Law.

Posted (edited)

I have revised the original list to help me with my thinking. I have given the unnamed people in the list some speculative names and tried to identify birth dates and ages as follows:

Original List...................Name.......S...Birth.. Age....Age

...................................................... 597....588

============================....======....==...====.. ====...====

Lehi & Sariah...................Lehi......M.....645.....48.....57

................................Sariah....F.....641.....44.....53

__Laman.........................Laman.....M.....623.....26.....35

__Lemuel........................Lemuel....M.....620.....23.....32

__Nephi.........................Nephi.....M.....614.....17.....26

__Sam...........................Sam.......M.....617.....20.....29

__Jacob.........................Jacob.....M.....596.....NA..... 8

__Joseph........................Joseph....M.....593.....NA..... 5

__daughter 1....................Reuth*....F.....609.....12.....21

__daughter 2....................Hadesh*...F.....604..... 7.....16

Ishmael & wife..................Ishmael...M.....654.....57.....66

................................Ephrath*..F.....649.....52.....61

__daughter 1 (married Zoram)....Abdiel*...M.....629.....32.....41

__son 1 (married - children)....Shoel*....M.....626.....29.....38

__son 2 (married - children)....Dinah*....F.....623.....26.....35

__daughter 2 (married Laman)....Sheerah*..F.....620.....23.....32

__daughter 3 (married Lemuel)...Leah*....vF.....617.....20.....29

__daughter 4 (Married Sam)......Tamar*....F.....614.....17.....26

__daughter 5 (married Nephi)....Naamah*...F.....611.....14.....23

Zoram (the servant of Laban)....Zoram.....M.....633.....36.....45

*Imaginary Name I am using for my convenience later.

(I found it impossible to use either HTML or BBCode to produce the table here)

I invite comments and critiques.

I note that there are two families here with at least 7.5 children in each family. (I say "at least" because in some cases there would could be more children that we are not aware of. This is the smallest list of people.)

This approximately matches the number of children one would expect if female fertility would start at about 18 to 20 years of age and would continue for 25 to 30 years, having as many children as possible but losing some (up to half) of them on the way to maturity so that on average there would be one new child every 4 years starting 1 year after the age of 19:

Age....Children

20................1

24................2

28................3

32................4

36................5

40................6

44................7

48................8

Next I want to postulate marriages and develop a "census" list of potential families who would have arrived in about 588 with their ages. This would be the starting point for the model.

Edited by CASteinman
Posted

Jacob and Joseph could have been twins.

But that is very relevant and something I had not thought about. I want to look for clues to see if there are suggestions either way.

Good call!

Posted (edited)
I found it impossible to use either HTML or BBCode to produce the table here

I would have responded by now, but I too have having a devil of a time with the table formatting. Keeping the whole table in Courier New -- padding with white periods (of same font) -- works only sometimes. Right now my table is pretty screwed up. Any suggestions on how to best handle this?

Edited by cursor
Posted

I would have responded by now, but I too have having a devil of a time with the table formatting. Keeping the whole table in Courier New -- padding with white periods (of same font) -- works only sometimes. Right now my table is pretty screwed up. Any suggestions on how to best handle this?

I have no idea. It is confusing to me that the BBCode or HTML codes do not work. But I used the trick you described above and it seems to have worked for me but it took a long annoying time.

MODERATORS OR EXPERTS: Question -- how do you insert Tables of Data into posts?

Posted

I totally agree!

I probably spent 4 hours messing around with [non-]formatting system, trying to submit something/anything ... I mean, even half-way reasonable. No luck.

Posted

I invite comments and critiques.

A 26 year old single male seems pretty impossible. Especially with parents that are seem to be well off.

Also, why the years 597 and 588? I can see 588 since the Book of Mormon foot notes have them arriving in the Americas at that time but why 597 instead of 600? Jacob could have been born by then.

Posted

And why is the 2nd son of Ishmael a female going by the name of Dinah? :crazy: Or is that a switcheroo with the first daughter who is a male named Abdiel? ;)

Posted

A 26 year old single male seems pretty impossible. Especially with parents that are seem to be well off.

Also, why the years 597 and 588? I can see 588 since the Book of Mormon foot notes have them arriving in the Americas at that time but why 597 instead of 600? Jacob could have been born by then.

I agree about the 26 years old. I will revisit that.

597 is one of about 3 possible years for when Lehi left Jerusalem. But I would say that I should then be consistent and make it 585 instead of 588.

Good calls. Something to work on.

Posted

And why is the 2nd son of Ishmael a female going by the name of Dinah? :crazy: Or is that a switcheroo with the first daughter who is a male named Abdiel? ;)

LOL... THAT would be a HUGE editing error that I missed in spending the hours going back and forth with different efforts trying to get the table up on the screen. Sorry! Need to fix.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...