Bill “Papa” Lee Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 If the most scandalous thing that people can say about someone in public life is that he put his dog on the roof in a carrier, then this has got to be a good man. Here in the South we know dogs live to ride in the open air…how did this become news?http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/post/mitt-romneys-dog-belongs-in-back-seat/2012/04/18/gIQAN3r2QT_blog.htmlPlease keep this clean and unpolitical.
thesometimesaint Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 Pa Pa:I lived in the South too. Few if any took a sick dog on a twelve hour trip in the back of a pickup truck(or strapped to the top of a car). It is unsafe and cruel. Show me how a man treats his dog and I'll show you how he'll treat you.
Calm Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 Show me how a man treats his dog and I'll show you how he'll treat you. Because everyone values their dogs as much as they value other human beings.....
LDS_RM Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 TSS has a good point about how someone treats a dog. It is not as though there are not many other reasons to not support one person over the other.
thesometimesaint Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 LDS_RM:There are any number of reasons to vote for or against someone. Cruelty to animals ranks way up there for a vote against.
Calm Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 The term "cruelty" implies intent to harm. By any stretch, I don't think one can honestly claim that Romney intended to harm his dog.Accuse him of neglect, carelessness if you want, but cruelty is over the top and discredits your criticism as melodrama,
Calm Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 And this has nothing to do with the Church so I am out of here.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.