The Credible Hulk

[kolipoki09]

I saw this being tossed around the Internet today. For those that take the time to meticulously document their sources, it can be an arduous process.

So the question remains . . . who is MDDB's "Credible Hulk"? Or more broadly, which authors within Mormon Studies do you think tend to "bulk up" on their footnotes/endnotes?

I also read this week on a website I occasionally visit for comic relief, that citing references "is to be a slave to hearsay."

Nominations will be accepted as long as this thread is open. Enjoy!

Edited April 19, 2012 by kolipoki09

[Anijen]

I have always enjoyed reading all of poulsenll posts. He cites sources very well. I have also enjoyed smac he always backs up his posts with great links too.

[Bill “Papa” Lee]

I have always enjoyed reading all of poulsenll posts. He cites sources very well. I have also enjoyed smac he always backs up his posts with great links too.

Smac is a lawyer so he does it out of natural habit.

[WalkerW]

Volgadon. He has extensive knowledge in ancient sources, languages, history, etc. and a relatively unique cultural position as an Israeli Mormon. His posts are always hulking with credibility.

However, my sister did post it on my Facebook wall because it reminded her of me, so...

Edited June 14, 2012 by WalkerW

[Anijen]

A few more that I am impressed with;

Robert Smith

Kevin Christensen

William Schryver

NoFear