Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

This Is My Doctrine: The Development Of Mormon Theology


Recommended Posts

Posted

Just heard from the publisher - looks like it will be out on Friday, and I think with an e/kindle version available, too. So that's cool.

Posted

Just heard from the publisher - looks like it will be out on Friday, and I think with an e/kindle version available, too. So that's cool.

Ok awesome, thanks for the info!

Posted

I found it today on barnesandnoble.com for nook, but it says it's volume 2. What is volume 1?

The ebook editions were separated into two parts - it's one book, just divided. It's up at amazon.com now as well, in hardcopy and in two-part Kindle edition:

Hardcopy

Kindle part 1, part 2

Posted

Can you give us a short synopsis of the books purpose, maybe a shortened version of your review (though I did enjoy reading it)?

Posted

Can you give us a short synopsis of the books purpose, maybe a shortened version of your review (though I did enjoy reading it)?

Basically it expresses the scriptural lineage of Current Doctrinal Concepts, and contrasts with how the topics were originally conceived and expressed in Old Testament, New Testament, Book of Mormon and Early Mormonism. It's somewhat iconoclastic in which it challenges the concept of having the Same Understanding consistently being transmitted/restored from time period to time period, and also serves as a function "snopes" handbook for identifying scriptures commonly used as prooftexts for modern doctrinal concepts.

It is not a discussion of the progession and evolution of doctrine from 1820-Present (Terryl Givens, I believe, is working on a two volume work that does that) - but rather presents topical snap shots of contrasting usage of scriptures and terminology at different periods of time.

It's written by an active BYU professor, although his views definitely contrast with the correlated narrative. In many ways, I see it as an invitation to CES to acknowledge and explore the elephant in the room.

Posted

It would seem there might be room for such a view given that not all keys at all times were given, meaning that the knowledge or need of the authority to use the power of the priesthood in a certain way was not necessary. I not that very little is reflected in most religious literature (Bible, Book of Mormon) regarding specifics of what was to be done with the priesthood as opposed to the generally stronger exhortations as to how a people who held the priesthood should live. I believe we extrapolate a great deal from what little we find.

Posted

Does anyone know why the E-version has been divided into two parts? I noticed that same thing with Brant Gardner's new book.

Basically, taking Amazon's royalty policy into consideration, it's actually the best way for them to release these books in a way that 1) lets them actually make a profit, and 2) makes the price somewhat reasonable for an e-version. I understand they'd prefer not to do it this way, but it's the only way which actually makes it possible for a small niche publisher like Kofford to get it out there digitially without charging full retail hardback price. (combined, the eversions end up being $20 - the hardcover retail price is $34)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...