Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Net or Gross Tithing?


cion

  

77 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you pay tithing on net or gross income?

    • Net
      27
    • Gross
      33
    • other
      17


Recommended Posts

Posted
Personally I think spending all that Church money on the City Creek centre is appalling.

You're entitled to an opinion. But yours is no more valuable than anyone else's, and much less so than those whose duty it is (see Doc&Cov 120) to disburse the Lord's monies.

Further, you contradict yourself below.

Think of the difference those funds could make if properly managed around the world.

I'd say this is the place you say one thing and then its opposite.

These monies are being "properly managed", and, last I checked, Salt Lake City is one of those places in the category of "around the world".

The Church could even afford to put in a management structure to make sure they were properly utilised.

Section 120 clearly defines that "management structure". You might want to read it.

Being the gentleman I am, I'll make it easy.

1 Verily, thus saith the Lord, the time is now come, that it shall be disposed of by a council, composed of the First Presidency of my Church, and of the bishop and his council, and by my high council; and by mine own voice unto them, saith the Lord. Even so. Amen.
The fact that the Church doesn't disclose financial information shows (in my view) that they are frightened of how it would be perceived/used - they hide it for a reason.

Yes, there is a reason. It's not nefarious, though, sorry to report.

When we spend money and tell people about it (as, e.g., Haitian relief), people say we're just blowing our own horn, and that it's for Public Relations purposes. You're a prime example, too, of when the non-tithing/offering disbursements are reported, you whine that you'd spend the money differently, and that your priorities are more reasonable than those of the Brethren. We do not disclose these damned-if-we-do-and-damned-if-we-don't expenditures because we're damned if we do, and we're damned if we don't. And you're among those damning us.

If funds were being used by inspiration they should have nothing to fear by being open about it.

"They" have you.

Lehi

Posted

LOL, yes I think I would struggle to attempt sincerity.

Personally I think spending all that Church money on the City Creek centre is appalling.

Think of the difference those funds could make if properly managed around the world.

The Church could even afford to put in a management structure to make sure they were properly utilised.

The fact that the Church doesn't disclose financial information shows (in my view) that they are frightened of how it would be perceived/used - they hide it for a reason.

If funds were being used by inspiration they should have nothing to fear by being open about it.

Jon63,

It sounds like you are resident of SLC by the way you go on about the mall.

If so, do yourself a favor. Go down to Temple Square, the west end between the tabernacle and Church History Museum. There you will find a tour bus with senior missionaries that will be more than happy to take you down to welfare square and show you what a portion of the Church funds go to.

I think you will be surprised and how much world wide relief they provide, anonymously BTW, for the reason stated above.

I think you underestimate just how much good the church welfare system does for more that just it's members.

Return and report.

Theo

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...