Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

The Christmas Story


Mortal Man

Recommended Posts

Posted

You mean the Bible isn't the "inerrant" "God breathed" Word of God?

Tell me it isn't so!

I'm afraid it's not, but don't tell Rob Bowman.

Posted

Mortal Man, I am wondering if you have ever read Raymond E. Brown's book, "the Birth of the Messiah"? It lists 11 similarities between the accounts in Matthew and Luke and deals with what you are reffering too-I think, it has been awhile since I read it! haha!

Posted

Another anti thread that twists information out of context and is filled with dark lies!

This has NO baring on my salvation!

Line upon line!

I KNOW the christmas story is true!

I offer you my testimony of the truth in these things!

And, in case you didn't know, the christmas story is NOT doctrine!

BTW: Merry Christmas to all :P

Peace,

Ceeboo

Posted

Just add "current scholars believe" to any claim of dates, and remember that not having records of contemporary events or people surviving today doesn't mean that there were no contemporary events or people at the time.

Posted

Ceeboo:

There is no question that there are differences in the Nativity stories as told in the Bible. That doesn't make the overall story any less true.

Actually the Nativity story is indispensable to my(your) salvation.

I don't know about you, but I sure don't know everything. I sure learn line upon line.

As do I. :P

As do I. ;)

That God(the Son) chose to be born into mortality is doctrine.

Merry Christmas Ceeboo, and may Santa be good to you. :crazy:

Posted

Footnote 4. In producing his gospel, Matthew relied on the Greek Septuagint translation of the Old Testament. This is known from his misquotes of Hebrew Isaiah et al., based on LXX mistranslations, and from his use of the Septuagint

Posted

Very interesting analysis, thanks. As I was reading the passages I realized they hold the most sentimental value for me of any other scriptures. Ah, Christmas.

Posted

The LXX translation was made from a Hebrew recension which was superior to the much later Massoretic Text, and the LXX frequently has readings which are far superior to the MT.

Yet, you appear to want to have your cake and eat it too in conveniently claiming that LXX Greek parthenos

Posted

Merry Christmas David!

IF you will only redistribute all of your wealth to the poor I am sure David will forgive you.

Posted

Mortal Man, I am wondering if you have ever read Raymond E. Brown's book, "the Birth of the Messiah"? It lists 11 similarities between the accounts in Matthew and Luke and deals with what you are reffering too-I think, it has been awhile since I read it! haha!

I'd expect a dozen or so similarities between independent accounts of the same event.

Posted

Another anti thread that twists information out of context and is filled with dark lies!

This has NO baring on my salvation!

Line upon line!

I KNOW the christmas story is true!

I offer you my testimony of the truth in these things!

And, in case you didn't know, the christmas story is NOT doctrine!

Merry Christmas Ceeboo!

I see you are getting into the apologetic spirit.

Posted

Just add "current scholars believe" to any claim of dates, and remember that not having records of contemporary events or people surviving today doesn't mean that there were no contemporary events or people at the time.

I am certain that there were contemporary events and people at the time of Jesus' birth.

Posted

IF you will only redistribute all of your wealth to the poor I am sure David will forgive you.

I'm more of a believer in the Parable of the Talents and the Parable of the Wise and Foolish Virgins.

Posted

If I had to pick one of the two accounts, I'd probably go with Luke.

The Matthew version has too many parts that are inconsistant with known history. Example: If there really were a slaughter of all male infants under the age of two, you would think that somebody other than Matthew would have noticed. (ie, Josephus, etc, not to mention Mark, Luke and John). I think the author of Matthew was trying very hard to have the coming of Christ in the meridian of time fit every Messianic prophecy as they were understood in his day.

I have pointed out in previous years that EVERY ATTEMPT I have ever seen to date the Nativity always uses the death of Herod as the key limiting factor. But if the Matthew version is incorrect (sorry sola-scripturites), and we look at Luke only, I wonder whether we would still be looking at a 4 BC date for the Nativity.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...