Stargazer Posted 14 hours ago Author Posted 14 hours ago 3 hours ago, the narrator said: You completely missed the point. "Sacrament" is essentially synonymous with "ordinance" or "ritual." Baptism is a sacrament. Confirmation is a sacrament. Communion is a sacrament. The endowment is a sacrament. Sealings are sacrament. Etc. In the rest of Christianity (and in early Mormonism, I believe), the term is used to describe all of the key ordinances and rituals of Christianity. Early Mormons also used "Lord's supper" and "communion," but somewhere along the way they began using "the sacrament" exclusively for communion. I suspect it comes from a misunderstanding of D&C 20, which uses "the sacrament" as a simple reference to communion but then later began to be misread as the actual name of the ritual. I didn't miss the point. You're just trying to belabor some point, and I'm not entire sure which one, to be honest. I know it's synonymous with "ordinance" or "ritual". The Catholics call several things "sacraments," including baptism, the Eucharist, marriage, and so on. We just use the word to mean that one thing, what others call the Eurcharist. Are you going to argue that it's wrong? You want more precision or something? I thought you were denigrating things taken too precisely as "incantations." Shall we exchange pedantry over all this? I was simply explaining where that came from. Like you asked in your little parenthetical. But it appears it was a rhetorical question, and you weren't interested in an answer.
webbles Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 3 hours ago, the narrator said: You completely missed the point. "Sacrament" is essentially synonymous with "ordinance" or "ritual." Baptism is a sacrament. Confirmation is a sacrament. Communion is a sacrament. The endowment is a sacrament. Sealings are sacrament. Etc. In the rest of Christianity (and in early Mormonism, I believe), the term is used to describe all of the key ordinances and rituals of Christianity. Early Mormons also used "Lord's supper" and "communion," but somewhere along the way they began using "the sacrament" exclusively for communion. I suspect it comes from a misunderstanding of D&C 20, which uses "the sacrament" as a simple reference to communion but then later began to be misread as the actual name of the ritual. I bet it is influence from Rigdon and his group. Campbellites used the term "ordinances" instead of "sacraments". (https://www.bobcornwall.com/2017/12/the-disciples-of-christ-and-sacraments.html talk a bit about this). Along with D&C 20 specifically using sacrament for the communion and Campbellites using ordinances for baptism and communion and then needing a word for what happens in the temple, it seems like a natural language evolution. 1
Stargazer Posted 13 hours ago Author Posted 13 hours ago 3 hours ago, the narrator said: If precise ritual acts and precise ritual language are required to sway God's will or the cosmos, that makes it an incantation. Argue with English, not with me. English isn't arguing with me. You are. This isn't Army of Darkness with the final word of the incantation "Klaatu Barad Nikto" being pronounced incorrectly and then all hell breaks out.
the narrator Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 53 minutes ago, Stargazer said: I know it's synonymous with "ordinance" or "ritual". The Catholics call several things "sacraments," including baptism, the Eucharist, marriage, and so on. We just use the word to mean that one thing, what others call the Eurcharist. Are you going to argue that it's wrong? You want more precision or something? I thought you were denigrating things taken too precisely as "incantations." Shall we exchange pedantry over all this? I was simply explaining where that came from. Like you asked in your little parenthetical. But it appears it was a rhetorical question, and you weren't interested in an answer. Yo, chill out. I was merely pointing out that I did not know when and precisely why Mormons began using "sacrament" exclusively for communion.
the narrator Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 36 minutes ago, webbles said: I bet it is influence from Rigdon and his group. Campbellites used the term "ordinances" instead of "sacraments". (https://www.bobcornwall.com/2017/12/the-disciples-of-christ-and-sacraments.html talk a bit about this). Along with D&C 20 specifically using sacrament for the communion and Campbellites using ordinances for baptism and communion and then needing a word for what happens in the temple, it seems like a natural language evolution. That makes sense. Thanks.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now