Attraction doesn't mean the action is acceptable to God

[SamuelTheLamanite]

I read an interesting psychology  article "In a 2010 issue of the Internet Journal of Human Sexuality, clinical sexologist Dr. Amy Marsh described what she claims is the first ever research study conducted on a group of 40 objectophiles of which 21 English-speaking participants shared their experiences. On US television, Marsh revealed that she supported OS as a legitimate sexual orientation. Her research doesn’t appear to indicate childhood trauma being a factor in the development of OS. She stated there would be far more objectophiles if this was the case" 

So just because objectophilia attraction is a sexual orentation doesn't mean object marriage is acceptable in the eyes of God. Object marriage is already happening, a Tokyo man marries video game character http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/12/16/japan.virtual.Tokyo man marries video game characterindex.html 

Computer scientist predicts, "By 40 or 50 years, everyone of a marriageable age will have grown up with electronics all around them at home, and not see them as abnormal. People who grow up with all sorts of electronic gizmos will find android robots to be fairly normal as friends, partners, lovers....It's not that people will fall in love with an algorithm, but that people will fall in love with a convincing simulation of a human being, and convincing simulations can have a remarkable effect on people." 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/humans-marrying-robots/ 

But God's definition of marriage is never going to change. 

Edited August 29, 2017 by SamuelTheLamanite

[The Nehor]

We already have realdolls (do not google!) and they have not taken over. A single computer scientist saying we will all fall in love with androids is unconvincing.

I do not think anyone is arguing that attraction alone validates something in the eyes of God.