mfbukowski Posted May 24, 2016 Posted May 24, 2016 44 minutes ago, Eek! said: Just FYI, at least one other person here is aware of it. Good. That makes it "objectively true". Two or more witnesses and all that. 1
Eek! Posted May 24, 2016 Posted May 24, 2016 1 minute ago, mfbukowski said: Good. That makes it "objectively true". Two or more witnesses and all that. Well I can't claim to be an eye-witness, but then you already knew that. IT certainly does have some very interesting implications, for this thread and elsewhere.
mfbukowski Posted May 24, 2016 Posted May 24, 2016 11 minutes ago, Eek! said: Well I can't claim to be an eye-witness, but then you already knew that. IT certainly does have some very interesting implications, for this thread and elsewhere. Yes, I get it but even in court statements of actual witness are admissible. The implications are huge- it's a totally different way to understand the gospel, revolutionary even. What is interesting to me is what ELSE is there that we DON'T know? I have always found it difficult to know what I don't know.
Recommended Posts