wenglund Posted February 19, 2014 Author Posted February 19, 2014 (edited) There you go with your idiosyncratic definitions.http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MarriageRB602.pdf You are confusing "broad" with "idiosyncratic." Thanks, -Wade Englund- Edited February 19, 2014 by wenglund
wenglund Posted February 19, 2014 Author Posted February 19, 2014 Statistically! And this is what your argument is based on here. You are wanting to form conclusions (and ultimately public policy) regarding individual rights based upon statistical comparisons of the larger demographics. No. Thanks, -Wade Englund-
wenglund Posted February 19, 2014 Author Posted February 19, 2014 (edited) So, the proponents of SSM are not trying to disingenuously woo the support of the populace through the means of false propaganda.. Not exactly. It would be better if you stuck with the words i used rather than putting your own words into my mouth. At the very least it my cut down on these kinds of tedious exchanges. Thanks, -Wade Englund- Edited February 19, 2014 by wenglund
wenglund Posted February 19, 2014 Author Posted February 19, 2014 (edited) Yes Fine. Once you determine to speak for me, the conversation is effectively ended whether it ever started or not.. Thanks, -Wade Englund- Edited February 19, 2014 by wenglund
Senator Posted February 19, 2014 Posted February 19, 2014 Not exactly. It would be better if you stuck with the words i used rather than putting your own words into my mouth. At the very least it my cut down on these kinds of tedious exchanges. Thanks, -Wade Englund- Thanks, -Wade Englund- Oh geez.... You've got more weave and dodge than the Great Ali. I'm outa here. Thread closed.
Recommended Posts