The Nehor Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 DOH!!! See even Scientists make mistake in their Math. I wonder how many Carbon dates have been screwed up because of fuzzy math?Not many. By comparison it's a pretty simple equation.
Mariner Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 So, it seems that E=mc2 was the reason for the misinterpretation of the data in the first place.E=mc2 stands proven once again.Did anyone seriously think that there would be any other outcome after things finally got sorted out?
The Nehor Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 Did anyone seriously think that there would be any other outcome after things finally got sorted out?I hoped so but was 99% sure it would be found to be an error.
Franktalk Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 So they found the error. That was expected.
Ariarates Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 Pretty basic mistake, if you think about it.
Mariner Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 Pretty basic mistake, if you think about it.Especially if your results would appear to violate special relativity.(And even more so in light of the fact that time dilations of this magnitude have been measured and reported from the clocks of satellite systems for some time now.)
Recommended Posts