Vance Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 I guess we are now down to quibbling about what the definition of "is" is. Carry on!
Daniel2 Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 I guess we are now down to quibbling about what the definition of "is" is. Carry on!Actually, Vance, I haven't seen anyone questioning the definition of "is."The heart of the question, however, is what is the definition of "doctrine."The "official LDS website" may quote portions of LDS cannon, but I think most Latter-day Saints would agree that the official website (official though it may be) isn't an infallible source which should always be taken as offical Church doctrine.Darin
Vance Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 Actually, Vance, I haven't seen anyone questioning the definition of "is."Sorry, you didn't get the joke. The heart of the question, however, is what is the definition of "doctrine."Right, because we all know that what you find on lds.org isn't official. RRIIIGHT! The "official LDS website" may quote portions of LDS cannon, but I think most Latter-day Saints would agree that the official website (official though it may be) isn't an infallible source which should always be taken as offical Church doctrine.Right, and we are all supposed to turn off our own spiritual receptors, disregard every thing that can be found there and accept you guys' interpretations without question.I get it!! OK I get it.Carry on.
semlogo Posted April 14, 2011 Author Posted April 14, 2011 All,You could just search the OFFICIAL LDS WEB SITE and see what you find regarding the Law of Chastity.Like this,http://lds.org/search?query=%22LAW+OF+CHASTITY%22〈=engBy doing so you find such gems as these."God has commanded us that only in marriage between a man and a woman are we to have sexual relations. This commandment is called the law of chastity.""We are to have sexual relations only with our spouse to whom we are legally married. No one, male or female, is to have sexual relations before marriage. After marriage, sexual relations are permitted only with our spouse.""Like other violations of the law of chastity, homosexual behavior is a serious sin. Latter-day prophets have spoken about the dangers of homosexual behavior and about the Church’s concern for people who may have such inclinations.""Chastity means not having any sexual relations before marriage. It also means complete fidelity to husband or wife during marriage."You'll find scriptural support for everything there except homosexuality. Not everything published on the church website represents a specific revelation from God.
semlogo Posted April 14, 2011 Author Posted April 14, 2011 Right, because we all know that what you find on lds.org isn't official. RRIIIGHT!Is this official doctrine?http://lds.org/ensign/1971/07/of-royal-blood?lang=eng"The term Lamanite includes all Indians and Indian mixtures, such as the Polynesians, the Guatemalans, the Peruvians, as well as the Sioux, the Apache, the Mohawk, the Navajo, and others. It is a large group of great people."
Mordecai Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 In Greek, it's talking about prostitution. Prostitution is of course vile and unnatural...Making up what the scriptures say in Greek, huh? Rom 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature://Rom 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly...Rom 1:26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.//Rom 1:27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men...If we look here, http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Rom&c=1&t=KJV#26 , we can check what it says in Greek, actually. It doesn't mention prostitution anywhere. No version of the Bible says prostitution.
Mordecai Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 "The term Lamanite includes all Indians and Indian mixtures, such as the Polynesians, the Guatemalans, the Peruvians, as well as the Sioux, the Apache, the Mohawk, the Navajo, and others. It is a large group of great people."That's pretty much official in that the D&C uses the term to refer to Native Americans in general. That said, it doesn't represent doctrine. Only terminology.
Sky Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 I don’t mean to offend anybody, but according to President Spencer W. Kimball, there are an ample amount of scriptures which condemn the practice of homosexuality, either directly or indirectly. The scriptures are still here – they have not changed in the past 30 or so years since Kimball was the prophet.If the Church were to ever change its doctrine regarding homosexuality, it would require a major change in the way the scriptures have been interpreted after all these years. I believe it would present major problems for the Church. So for those who would argue otherwise, this is what you are up against. If any of you care to look:Leviticus 20: 13, 15Romans 1: 26-28Matthew 19: 12Ezekiel 18: 21-232 Nephi 33: 3-5Moses 4: 4D&C 1: 31-322 Nephi 9: 31-342 Peter 2:17 Revelation 20: 122 Nephi 15: 19-212 Nephi 20: 33Acts 5: 3-4Psalm 107: 17Deuteronomy 23: 17Matthew 18: 8-91 Nephi 3: 72 Nephi 9: 40D&C 58: 42-43Matthew 11: 28-30Moroni 7: 12-14Jeremiah 2:13D&C 62: 32 Nephi 15: 15Job 38, 39 Genesis 4Abraham 5: 18D&C 104: 5-6Leviticus 18: 221 Corinthians 6: 9John 8: 112 Nephi 9: 40Alma 12: 34Revelation 3: 20-21D&C 1: 332 Nephi 9: 38-392 Nephi 27: 3Ezekiel 8: 122 Nephi 20: 15Alma 5: 17-21D&C 132: 52D&C 42: 22Revelation 3: 4-5Revelation 7: 13-15Alma 3: 272 Nephi 9: 20-282 Nephi 10: 23Mosiah 16: 11-12Alma 3: 26-27D&C 19: 15-18James 1: 13-15Alma 41: 5-10 Matthew 12: 30D&C 1: 3John 8: 34D&C 18: 6Revelation 2: 17Revelation 3: 17-192 Nephi 20: 32 Nephi 9: 292 Nephi 2: 27 Ether 2: 152 Nephi 20: 27Psalm 1: 71 Corinthians 7: 23D&C 18: 11Helaman 13: 38Revelation 3: 12Jeremiah 50: 62 Nephi 26: 222 Nephi 9: 31-38, 40Mosiah 26: 35-36Moroni 9: 4
Vance Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 Is this official doctrine?http://lds.org/ensign/1971/07/of-royal-blood?lang=eng"The term Lamanite includes all Indians and Indian mixtures, such as the Polynesians, the Guatemalans, the Peruvians, as well as the Sioux, the Apache, the Mohawk, the Navajo, and others. It is a large group of great people."The term "Lamanite" originated from the Book of Mormon. In that book it's usage came to mean non-Nephite. So then, the statement you provided is accurate.Thanks!
Vance Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 I don’t mean to offend anybody, but according to President Spencer W. Kimball, there are an ample amount of scriptures which condemn the practice of homosexuality, either directly or indirectly. The scriptures are still here – they have not changed in the past 30 or so years since Kimball was the prophet.If the Church were to ever change its doctrine regarding homosexuality, it would require a major change in the way the scriptures have been interpreted after all these years. I believe it would present major problems for the Church. So for those who would argue otherwise, this is what you are up against. If any of you care to look:Leviticus 20: 13, 15Romans 1: 26-28Matthew 19: 12Ezekiel 18: 21-232 Nephi 33: 3-5Moses 4: 4D&C 1: 31-322 Nephi 9: 31-342 Peter 2:17 Revelation 20: 122 Nephi 15: 19-212 Nephi 20: 33Acts 5: 3-4Psalm 107: 17Deuteronomy 23: 17Matthew 18: 8-91 Nephi 3: 72 Nephi 9: 40D&C 58: 42-43Matthew 11: 28-30Moroni 7: 12-14Jeremiah 2:13D&C 62: 32 Nephi 15: 15Job 38, 39 Genesis 4Abraham 5: 18D&C 104: 5-6Leviticus 18: 221 Corinthians 6: 9John 8: 112 Nephi 9: 40Alma 12: 34Revelation 3: 20-21D&C 1: 332 Nephi 9: 38-392 Nephi 27: 3Ezekiel 8: 122 Nephi 20: 15Alma 5: 17-21D&C 132: 52D&C 42: 22Revelation 3: 4-5Revelation 7: 13-15Alma 3: 272 Nephi 9: 20-282 Nephi 10: 23Mosiah 16: 11-12Alma 3: 26-27D&C 19: 15-18James 1: 13-15Alma 41: 5-10 Matthew 12: 30D&C 1: 3John 8: 34D&C 18: 6Revelation 2: 17Revelation 3: 17-192 Nephi 20: 32 Nephi 9: 292 Nephi 2: 27 Ether 2: 152 Nephi 20: 27Psalm 1: 71 Corinthians 7: 23D&C 18: 11Helaman 13: 38Revelation 3: 12Jeremiah 50: 62 Nephi 26: 222 Nephi 9: 31-38, 40Mosiah 26: 35-36Moroni 9: 4You just don't get it do you?These guys can easily correct our misinterpretation of ALL those verses.Sarcasm/off
semlogo Posted April 15, 2011 Author Posted April 15, 2011 I don’t mean to offend anybody, but according to President Spencer W. Kimball, there are an ample amount of scriptures which condemn the practice of homosexuality, either directly or indirectly. The scriptures are still here – they have not changed in the past 30 or so years since Kimball was the prophet.If the Church were to ever change its doctrine regarding homosexuality, it would require a major change in the way the scriptures have been interpreted after all these years. I believe it would present major problems for the Church. So for those who would argue otherwise, this is what you are up against. If any of you care to look:Leviticus 20: 13, 15Romans 1: 26-28Matthew 19: 12Ezekiel 18: 21-232 Nephi 33: 3-5Moses 4: 4D&C 1: 31-322 Nephi 9: 31-342 Peter 2:17 Revelation 20: 122 Nephi 15: 19-212 Nephi 20: 33Acts 5: 3-4Psalm 107: 17Deuteronomy 23: 17Matthew 18: 8-91 Nephi 3: 72 Nephi 9: 40D&C 58: 42-43Matthew 11: 28-30Moroni 7: 12-14Jeremiah 2:13D&C 62: 32 Nephi 15: 15Job 38, 39 Genesis 4Abraham 5: 18D&C 104: 5-6Leviticus 18: 221 Corinthians 6: 9John 8: 112 Nephi 9: 40Alma 12: 34Revelation 3: 20-21D&C 1: 332 Nephi 9: 38-392 Nephi 27: 3Ezekiel 8: 122 Nephi 20: 15Alma 5: 17-21D&C 132: 52D&C 42: 22Revelation 3: 4-5Revelation 7: 13-15Alma 3: 272 Nephi 9: 20-282 Nephi 10: 23Mosiah 16: 11-12Alma 3: 26-27D&C 19: 15-18James 1: 13-15Alma 41: 5-10 Matthew 12: 30D&C 1: 3John 8: 34D&C 18: 6Revelation 2: 17Revelation 3: 17-192 Nephi 20: 32 Nephi 9: 292 Nephi 2: 27 Ether 2: 152 Nephi 20: 27Psalm 1: 71 Corinthians 7: 23D&C 18: 11Helaman 13: 38Revelation 3: 12Jeremiah 50: 62 Nephi 26: 222 Nephi 9: 31-38, 40Mosiah 26: 35-36Moroni 9: 4The vast majority of these have nothing to do with homosexuality.
semlogo Posted April 15, 2011 Author Posted April 15, 2011 Making up what the scriptures say in Greek, huh? If we look here, http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Rom&c=1&t=KJV#26 , we can check what it says in Greek, actually. It doesn't mention prostitution anywhere. No version of the Bible says prostitution.A shallow analysis like that can only yield shallow results.
semlogo Posted April 15, 2011 Author Posted April 15, 2011 That's pretty much official in that the D&C uses the term to refer to Native Americans in general. That said, it doesn't represent doctrine. Only terminology.In other words, no.
semlogo Posted April 15, 2011 Author Posted April 15, 2011 The term "Lamanite" originated from the Book of Mormon. In that book it's usage came to mean non-Nephite. So then, the statement you provided is accurate.Thanks!The church has since dropped the position that all Native Americans are Lamanites.
Vance Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 The vast majority of these have nothing to do with homosexuality.And with a magic wave of his magic wand, he dismisses the opposition.
Jaybear Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 And with a magic wave of his magic wand, he dismisses the opposition.Does it really matter? If the leadership of the LDS Church purports to receive a revelation which changes the Church doctrine/policy towards gays, it the LDS apologists that will undertake the task of resolving the new policy/doctrine with those scriptures, as well as the past statements of GAs. I am confident that if you were to put on your apologists hat, you could find a way to square those scriptures with a more tolerant policy directed towards gays. That's the great thing about the scriptures. You can always find a way to explain away or ignore the ones you disagree with.
Sky Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 The vast majority of these have nothing to do with homosexuality.Well then, your disagreement is not with me - but with Spencer W. Kimball.
semlogo Posted April 15, 2011 Author Posted April 15, 2011 And with a magic wave of his magic wand, he dismisses the opposition.Go ahead and post full text citations of all the ones that are talking about homosexuality.
semlogo Posted April 15, 2011 Author Posted April 15, 2011 Well then, your disagreement is not with me - but with Spencer W. Kimball.Spencer W. Kimball, like all latter-day saints, was fallible.
Vance Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 Go ahead and post full text citations of all the ones that are talking about homosexuality.Sorry, but the burden of proof is on you.You are the one that is saying that they don't mean what they say, SO prove it.
Vance Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 Does it really matter? If the leadership of the LDS Church purports to receive a revelation which changes the Church doctrine/policy towards gays, it the LDS apologists that will undertake the task of resolving the new policy/doctrine with those scriptures, as well as the past statements of GAs. I am confident that if you were to put on your apologists hat, you could find a way to square those scriptures with a more tolerant policy directed towards gays. That's the great thing about the scriptures. You can always find a way to explain away or ignore the ones you disagree with.Wishful thinking that current doctrine will be changed, if enough external pressure is brought to bare, is . . . well, . . . wishful thinking.Homosexual behavior is anathema to the Spirit. It is in direct opposition to the plan of salvation.
Vance Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 Spencer W. Kimball, like all latter-day saints, was fallible.But far less fallible in regard to declaring doctrine/policy/practice than you.So . . . between the two of you, I should question his statements?
Vance Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 The church has since dropped the position that all Native Americans are Lamanites.Not an accurate description at all.What the church dropped was the statement that the Lehites were the "principle ancestors" of the American Indians.Which, of course, is irrelevant to the fact that "Lamanites" meant and means NON-Nephites, and does include the NON-Lehite American Indians.BTW, I am a native American.
semlogo Posted April 15, 2011 Author Posted April 15, 2011 Sorry, but the burden of proof is on you.You are the one that is saying that they don't mean what they say, SO prove it.I'm saying they DO mean what they say, but they say nothing about homosexuality. And I think you know that.A quick example2 Nephi 20: 33"33 Behold, the Lord, the Lord of Hosts shall lop the bough with terror; and the ahigh ones of stature shall be bhewn down; and the chaughty shall be humbled." 100% homosexuality free. In fact, The Book of Mormon, PoGP and D&C are 100% free of any commentary on homosexuality at all.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.