C14 Dating

[Stargazer]

I'm going to ask Zakuska the same questions that I asked on a previous thread and don't recall him (or her) answering: where are you going with all of this? I mean, if your wildest dreams came true and C14 dating was found to be not as error free as previously though, what would you like to conclude as a result? Are you trying to prove that the earth is actually 6000 years (or 6 days or whatever) old, that "Noah's ark" really did have dinosaurs on it (or trilobites for that matter), that Pangaea actually split apart in something like 50 years instead of 50 million, that the Big Bang is a hoax?

Where is this discussion headed?

I haven't paid this 4 month old discussion the slightest attention until today, but I would like to point out that trilobites being sea creatures, Noah would hardly have needed to loaded any onto the Ark for preservation.

I think Zak's original purpose in ginning up this thread was to get into the face of Carbon-14 Religionists. Nothing more. I think he succeeded.

[Zakuska]

I haven't paid this 4 month old discussion the slightest attention until today, but I would like to point out that trilobites being sea creatures, Noah would hardly have needed to loaded any onto the Ark for preservation.

I think Zak's original purpose in ginning up this thread was to get into the face of Carbon-14 Religionists. Nothing more. I think he succeeded.

Hazib... give that man 1,000,000 rupees!

That may even be an understatement with all the preening and straightening of the ruffled feathers and ego stroking by the C14 worshipers with the rash of threads about "labotimized theists vs science."

I have to admit that it has been entertaining watching them throw their "profits" under the bus as junk scientists.