Zeta-Flux Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 Please be specific. I didn't see anything in the articles which proved this point. But I have to admit I didn't read them that thoroughly as reading Rich Lowery is a nauseating experience. I can't tell whether he is an incredible idiot, or that just panders to idiots. So how did Walker directly financially benefit by the ruling?First, I said he *could be* directly financially benefited, not that he necessarily *must* be.Second, I'm pretty sure we are talking about Ed Whelan, not Rich Lowery. In fact, Ed is quoting an article from the San Francisco Chronicle of all places. The link is: http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/243043/judge-walker-s-duty-recuse-ed-whelan
california boy Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 First, I said he *could be* directly financially benefited, not that he necessarily *must* be.Second, I'm pretty sure we are talking about Ed Whelan, not Rich Lowery. In fact, Ed is quoting an article from the San Francisco Chronicle of all places. The link is: http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/243043/judge-walker-s-duty-recuse-ed-whelanSo you are going to argue before the 9th circuit that the case should be thrown out because Judge Walker COULD financially benefit from this ruling? And the basis for that is what? That he is rumored to be gay, so he will get a lot of money if he makes that ruling? Good luck with that argument, This is a court of law we are talking about, not some right wing talk show.
Zeta-Flux Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 So you are going to argue before the 9th circuit that the case should be thrown out because Judge Walker COULD financially benefit from this ruling?Of course not. I'm not a lawyer. I'd be thrown in jail if I tried that.And the basis for that is what?Um... I just said I wouldn't do it. Oh wait, you jumped the gun. :-pThat he is rumored to be gay, so he will get a lot of money if he makes that ruling? Good luck with that argument, This is a court of law we are talking about, not some right wing talk show.I'm having trouble understanding you. The article itself says "As I
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.