Olavarria Posted December 28, 2008 Posted December 28, 2008 http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/mapcenter/map.aspxEther 10:19-20 19) And it came to pass that Lib also did that which was good in the sight of the Lord. And in the days of Lib the poisonous serpents were destroyed. Wherefore they did go into the land southward, to hunt food for the people of the land, for the land was covered with animals of the forest. And Lib also himself became a great hunter. 20) And they built a great city by the narrow neck of land, by the place where the sea divides the land. Olmec Time1100BC: After centuries of habitation, a second Olmec city is built at La Venta.Charles Phillips, Complete Illustrated History of the Aztec and Maya; Lorenz Books (June 25, 2007), pg 24. Jaredite Time(+/-) 200 years.1240BC: Lib builds his city on the narrow neck of land.Olmec PlaceOn the Strait of Tehuantepec, on/next to the Tonala River. The Tonala River empties into the Bay of Campeche.Jaredite Place "...by the narrow neck of land, by the place where the sea divides the land."The Olmec World ...a site with a bunch of FAMSI links.
Olavarria Posted December 28, 2008 Author Posted December 28, 2008 http://www.mesoweb.com/olmec/publications/...erEtal1967.htmlThe absence of occupation refuse beneath the mound constructions andsurfaced areas of the La Venta site, taken together with the general occurrenceof trash deposits beyond the perimeter of the ceremonial site area(Drucker 1952: 10-22), probably means that the ceremonial area was off-limitsas a living zone from the time of the earliest large-scale occupation of LaVenta island. That pre-Phase I mound structures and/or plaza surfacesexisted-probably in the main ceremonial s i t e area-is suggested by theclay chunks with colored clay wash-surfacings found in some of the f i l llayers underneath the Phase I structures and in some of the Phase I f i l l s(Drucker, Heizer and Squier 1959:37-38, 44, 67, 124, 298; Drucker andHeizer 1965:41-42). We now suggest that these earlier structures probablywere situated in the actual 'ceremonial s i t e area, but cannot estimate howmuch older they are than the Phase I constructions named and identified byDrucker, Heizer and Squier (1959). There i s no pottery or stone sculpturethat can be associated with these evidences of pre-Phase I clay mounds orfloors. Apparently La Venta island, or that part of the island where theceremonial center we know as the La Venta site was built, was not occupiedor used until the ceremonial s i t e was established in pre-Phase I times.This inference strongly suggests that the La Venta s i t e is contemporaneouswith the oldest refuse deposits on the perimeter of the site. This conclusion,while important, would be even more significant i f we knew how to datethe pre-Phase I activity in the ceremonial s i t e area, and had reliable datesfor the lowest refuse levels in the trash deposits lying just outside theceremonial s i t e boundaries.The age of La Venta Phase I can be judged from UCLA-1286 (3000 j: 60),UCLA-1285 (2820 j: 60), and UCLA-902 (2940 j: 80); the average age of thesethree samples i s 2920 years (970 B.C.). Two unchecked dates (M-529, 2860 2300; M-535, 3110 j: 300) do not contradict this, and i f all five are averaged,we have 2946 BP, or 996 B.C.In summary, we propose that Phase I at La Venta dates from 1000 B.C.,and that abandonment of the s i t e at the end of Phase IV occurred about 600B.C. This is a change of 200 years from the age of the s i t e based upon theMichigan radiocarbon dates f i r s t published by Drucker, Heizer and Squier(1957).
Olavarria Posted December 28, 2008 Author Posted December 28, 2008 Olmec Time1000BC: A second Olmec city is built at La Venta.Jaredite Time(+/-) 200 years.1240BC: Lib builds his city on the narrow neck of land.Olmec PlaceOn the Strait of Tehuantepec, on/next to the Tonala River. The Tonala River empties into the Bay of Campeche.Jaredite Place "...by the narrow neck of land, by the place where the sea divides the land."
Olavarria Posted December 29, 2008 Author Posted December 29, 2008 http://anthropology.si.edu/olmec/english/sites/laVenta.htm"A major Olmec cultural and political center from about 1000 BC to 400 BC...."
Olavarria Posted December 29, 2008 Author Posted December 29, 2008 Or was it San Lorenzo?http://www.ancientamerica.org/library/medi...F%20LIB.htm?n=0SOME OF THE CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN OLMECS AND JAREDITES AND BETWEEN SAN LORENZO AND THE CITY OV LIB (Ether 10:19-22, 11:5-7).2400-2500 BC Earliest possible antecedents of Olmec ceramics in highlands of Mexico. Jaredites arrive in Mexico. 1450 BC San Lorenzo built on Isthmus of Tehu
blackstrap Posted December 29, 2008 Posted December 29, 2008 Is there any geological evidence that the "sea divides the Land" at any time?? A river,even a large one would not be considered to be a sea (salt). A sea,on the other hand, would be a pretty good barrier to wild animals.
Olavarria Posted December 29, 2008 Author Posted December 29, 2008 Is there any geological evidence that the "sea divides the Land" at any time?? A river,even a large one would not be considered to be a sea (salt). A sea,on the other hand, would be a pretty good barrier to wild animals."by the place where the sea divides the land"I think a river that empties into a bay might qualify.
blackstrap Posted December 29, 2008 Posted December 29, 2008 Water encroaching on the land does not seem to fit the idea of dividing the land. Unless the area was quite massive like the Amazon delta... If there is some evidence of a Bering strait land bridge then might there be some evidence of a land "trough" in Mesoamerica?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.