AnchoredinChrist Posted Thursday at 04:47 PM Posted Thursday at 04:47 PM Maybe this photo has already been circulated on this site before, but I couldn't find it in a quick search and I hadn't seen it myself until last week so I thought I'd share. Whose name comes to mind when you see this photograph? 2
AnchoredinChrist Posted Thursday at 04:55 PM Author Posted Thursday at 04:55 PM There is a super long and detailed analysis of the photograph here: https://theology.science.blog/2024/09/15/is-this-photograph-finally-joseph-smith/ Of all the points of argument, one that is really compelling to me is what the writer calls, “Apparent hypertrophy of the left orbicularis oris muscle, due possibly to forceful speaking (the outdoor preaching venues in Nauvoo were notorious for requiring loud speaking)”: This “hypertrophy” of the left side of his mouth is visible on his death mask both when the light on the mask is shining from the side or from the front: I also think the ear to be very distinctly compelling as well, what the writer of the article calls a "detached lobule": 2
AnchoredinChrist Posted Thursday at 05:18 PM Author Posted Thursday at 05:18 PM When I first saw this photo last week it was from someone who said they had previously received a visitation from Joseph Smith and had seen his face. They said that they consider this purported photograph of him to be a real one. The provenance of this photograph is WILD and an interesting story all on its own. It was first noticed by a church member (who has a blog) in a catalogue of old photographs in Brazil of all places. The original cataloguer had gotten the photograph from New York and brought it to South America. They had estimated the photograph to have been developed in 1845. Coincidentally, Joseph Smith wrote in his diary in 1844 of having his picture taken in New York. So he perhaps got the photo for his presidency campaign but died before it was sent back to Nauvoo. The church member in South America who found it in a random book of pictures decided to investigate it solely because they thought it looked like Joseph Smith. 1
webbles Posted Thursday at 11:35 PM Posted Thursday at 11:35 PM Interesting. I hope the author of the blog post does more investigation. I think the locket picture has much better provenance since it is in the family but this one is interesting as well. 1
AnchoredinChrist Posted Friday at 02:15 AM Author Posted Friday at 02:15 AM (edited) 2 hours ago, webbles said: Interesting. I hope the author of the blog post does more investigation. I think the locket picture has much better provenance since it is in the family but this one is interesting as well. I happen to think the locket photo is more likely to be Hyrum Smith, and when I looked to see if anyone else had thought so too I found this analysis of it that I thought was really compelling: https://josephsmithjrphoto.blogspot.com/2023/07/hyrum-smiths-identity-through.html?m=1 I know many think the locket photo to be depicting a man too old to be Joseph Smith, as he died at 38 and many people think the locket picture to be of a man in his 40s. Edited Friday at 02:21 AM by AnchoredinChrist
manol Posted Friday at 03:36 AM Posted Friday at 03:36 AM 1 hour ago, AnchoredinChrist said: I know many think the locket photo to be depicting a man too old to be Joseph Smith, as he died at 38 and many people think the locket picture to be of a man in his 40s. Sometimes it's not the years, it's the mileage. 4
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now