Behind The Movement For Ssm - Is Acceptance Inevitable?

[DavidB]

Kemara, good grief this is getting pathetic, you carved my post down to a single and made a claim about that statement. You context was the sentence you singled out for comment. In fact you did it twice.

Edited November 20, 2012 by DavidB

[Kemara]

Kemara, good grief this is getting pathetic, you carved my post down to a single and made a claim about that statement. You context was the sentence you singled out for comment. In fact you did it twice. Have fun remaking history.

Are you sure you do not bear the same name as the farmer in peter rabbit?

LOLOLOL....Oh the irony in this post.

[wenglund]

Hahaha, you are funny but unfortunately for you completely transparent. You are avoiding the issue at all costs, which is why you initially refused to answer my questions and then resorted to distortions, misrepresentations and a smoke screen you have labelled my diversion. It is the reason why you are refusing to answer my latest legitimate question.

I gave you a chance to come clean voluntarily, you refused my kind offer. So let’s get to the issue you are trying to avoid:

You claim:

You entire argument against me rests on that statement specific statement being true. Unfortunately for you it is not true and you know it and you are now trying to change the nature of our discussion and have attempted to shift the goal posts under cover of a smoke screen labelled my diversion.

The original post of mine that you responded to was this:

You responded with this:

I responded to your original post with this:

The context and nature of the discussion was specifically on the rights of homosexuals, we were not discussing the rights of heterosexuals. This is evidenced by other posters:

What really got you worked up was the fact that I responded to this statement:

with this:

You getting all worked up is irrelevant to the fact that my reply was in the nature and context of the discussion – homosexual rights. My questions to you of

were well inside any reasonable interpretation of the nature and context of the discussion – homosexual rights. Your claim that I am diverting this issue with my legitimate and contextually accurate questions is nothing short of utter nonsense.

It is too late for you to claim that you were not aware that this was the nature and context of my reply to you. You understood very well that the nature and context of the discussion was in relation to homosexual rights:

There it is in your own words, there is no doubt that you understood the nature and context of the discussion was in relation to homosexual rights.

So when you posted the law you did indeed intimate that it applied to homosexual rights and I am not alone in understanding your posts in this way. In response to your claim that you did not intimate that it only applies to one side:

I disagree with TAO, you didn’t imply anything, your made you position very clear.

Your current position, that your posting of the law did not intimate that it applied to one side, was made after the fact. It is no coincidence that you attempted to change your position after it was shown to be completely illogical.

I did not such thing. My claim was made within the nature and context of discussion - homosexual rights. My questions to you were withint the nature and context of the discussion - homosexual rights and not heterosexual rights which you very well know.

It is you who is obfuscating this issue, it is you who is shifting the goal posts, it is you who will not admit when you are wrong, it is you who has been attempting to divert, it is you who has attempted to change the nature and context of this discussion. It would be much better for you to simply admitted that are you wrong so we can move on. If not, that is ok with me, I dont mind pointing out your nonsense.

I admire your patience and sensible helpfulness and jovial attitude, particularly when it is in such stark contrast to the projective opposition.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Edited November 21, 2012 by wenglund

[Skylla]

This thread is done. Let's stay away from this subject until after the holiday please.

Skylla