Has Rob Bowman Lost All Credibility Within The Lds Community?

[bookofmormontruth]

For those who focus a microscope on our faith including our religious leaders (Joseph Smith). It is only fair to give the same exact respect to those "religious" leaders. You are welcome.

Other ways to ask the question:

Do those who post sacred Temple content (word for word) on their website (with a previous link to purchase it for $) deserve to be taken seriously?

Do those who post material on their website that is considered "anti-Mormon" from apologetic organizations like FAIR deserve our full attention and respect?

Does posting a new topic "It's Too Sacred" (while absolutely ignoring questions, responses and calling what is sacred, "secret ") show sincerity in truly wanting to know what the LDS feel and believe?

When I first knew of Rob, he had my utmost respect (I felt he was following after Paul Owens and Carl Mosser). After two months, Rob Bowman has lost all credibility in the LDS community and I recognize that I don't represent or speak for other LDS members, but to me this is true. And even though I believe he probably he is a great guy etc.., I definitely question his sincerity and motivation$. I also recognize that he has the right to post, but that is the only thing that I will respect. (I will respect the moderators if they decide to take this "controversial" poll down).

In Rob Bowman's own defense: he has stated: "once I knew about this" (Temple content could be purchased for $) the link was removed. So as the Research Director for IRR, he didn't even know what was on his own website.

[ELF1024]

For those who focus a microscope on our faith including our religious leaders (Joseph Smith). It is only fair to give the same exact respect to those "religious" leaders. You are welcome.

Other ways to ask the question:

Do those who post sacred Temple content (word for word) on their website (with a previous link to purchase it for $) deserve to be taken seriously?

Do those who post material on their website that is considered "anti-Mormon" from apologetic organizations like FAIR deserve our full attention and respect?

Does posting a new topic "It's Too Sacred" (while absolutely ignoring questions, responses and calling what is sacred, "secret ") show sincerity in truly wanting to know what the LDS feel and believe?

When I first knew of Rob, he had my utmost respect (I felt he was following after Paul Owens and Carl Mosser). After two months, Rob Bowman has lost all credibility in the LDS community and I recognize that I don't represent or speak for other LDS members, but to me this is true. And even though I believe he probably he is a great guy etc.., I definitely question his sincerity and motivations. I also recognize that he has the right to post, but that is the only thing that I will respect. (I will respect the moderators if they decide to take this "controversial" poll down).

In Rob Bowman's own defense: he has stated: "once I knew about this" (Temple content could be purchased for $) the link was removed. So as the Research Director for IRR, he didn't even know what was on his own website.

Thread to self destruct in five... four... three...

[Nemesis]

For those who focus a microscope on our faith including our religious leaders (Joseph Smith). It is only fair to give the same exact respect to those "religious" leaders. You are welcome.

Other ways to ask the question:

Do those who post sacred Temple content (word for word) on their website (with a previous link to purchase it for $) deserve to be taken seriously?

Do those who post material on their website that is considered "anti-Mormon" from apologetic organizations like FAIR deserve our full attention and respect?

Does posting a new topic "It's Too Sacred" (while absolutely ignoring questions, responses and calling what is sacred, "secret ") show sincerity in truly wanting to know what the LDS feel and believe?

When I first knew of Rob, he had my utmost respect (I felt he was following after Paul Owens and Carl Mosser). After two months, Rob Bowman has lost all credibility in the LDS community and I recognize that I don't represent or speak for other LDS members, but to me this is true. And even though I believe he probably he is a great guy etc.., I definitely question his sincerity and motivation$. I also recognize that he has the right to post, but that is the only thing that I will respect. (I will respect the moderators if they decide to take this "controversial" poll down).

In Rob Bowman's own defense: he has stated: "once I knew about this" (Temple content could be purchased for $) the link was removed. So as the Research Director for IRR, he didn't even know what was on his own website.

This does not fall within the scope of this board. If you want to attack someone there are other boards suited for this type of behavior. For the time being your privileges of starting threads has been revoked.

Nemesis