volgadon Posted March 22, 2010 Posted March 22, 2010 David Bokovoy, in a recent thread, had this to say.For what it's worth, the argument has never been that horses, i.e. equus ferus caballus, are tapirs. If one discounts the Isaiah passages, there simply are not many references in the BofM to the English word 'horse" to begin with. The first reference to
Ariarates Posted March 22, 2010 Posted March 22, 2010 As I said before, I'm not good with little details like this, so let mee see if I understand this correctly:And it came to pass that we did find upon the land of promise, as we journeyed in the wilderness, that there were beasts in the forests of every kind, both the cow and the ox, and the *** and the horse, and the goat and the wild goat, and all manner of wild animals, which were for the use of men.So what Nephi is saying here is: we found all kinds of beasts in the forest for the use of man. The examples he lists are just in there for literary value?
USU78 Posted March 22, 2010 Posted March 22, 2010 Shades of Irving Berlin!Taking stock of what I have and what I haven'tWhat do I find?The things I got will keep me satisfiedChecking up on what I have and what I haven'tWhat do I find?A healthy balance on the credit sideGot no diamondGot no pearlStill I think I'm a lucky girlI got the sun in the morning and the moon at nightI got the sun in the morning and the moon at nightGot no mansionGot no yachtStill I'm happy with what I gotI got the sun in the morning and the moon at nightI got the sun in the morning and the moon at nightSunshineGives me a lovely dayMoonlightGives me the Milky WayGot no checkbooksGot no banksStill I'd like to express my thanksI got the sun in the morning and the moon at nightI got the sun in the morning and the moon at nightAnd with the sun in the morningAnd the moon in the eveningI'm all right
Mola Ram Suda Ram Posted March 22, 2010 Posted March 22, 2010 So what Nephi is saying here is: we found all kinds of beasts in the forest for the use of man. The examples he lists are just in there for literary value?That is what I got out of it.
volgadon Posted March 22, 2010 Author Posted March 22, 2010 As I said before, I'm not good with little details like this, so let mee see if I understand this correctly:And it came to pass that we did find upon the land of promise, as we journeyed in the wilderness, that there were beasts in the forests of every kind, both the cow and the ox, and the *** and the horse, and the goat and the wild goat, and all manner of wild animals, which were for the use of men.So what Nephi is saying here is: we found all kinds of beasts in the forest for the use of man. The examples he lists are just in there for literary value?Not merely for literary value, it is really how people expressed themselves back then. Speakers of Semitic languages tend to use poetic flourishes even in every day speech, and in the past this was rather more pronounced.
Ariarates Posted March 22, 2010 Posted March 22, 2010 Not merely for literary value, it is really how people expressed themselves back then. Speakers of Semitic languages tend to use poetic flourishes even in every day speech, and in the past this was rather more pronounced.OK, so let me rephrase:What Nephi is saying here is: we found all kinds of beasts in the forest for the use of man. The examples he lists are just poetic flourishes?
volgadon Posted March 22, 2010 Author Posted March 22, 2010 OK, so let me rephrase:What Nephi is saying here is: we found all kinds of beasts in the forest for the use of man. The examples he lists are just poetic flourishes?Most probably.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.