What's the alternative? Wait another 10, 20, 30 years for academia to sort this out fully peer reviewed? No thanks. I've been looking for something like this for close to two decades. We shouldn't have to sort out 19 volumes of Nibley and decades of academic symposia/journals to get half of this, or wait until we are almost dead. I don't care if it's not perfect, if we later find some portion of it to be incorrect, or if we later find one of the references to be invalid. Excessive caution about critics finding some fault would not have been justification for witholding this thesis (however imperfect it might possibly be). Thank you Jonah. I've had more fun studying the OT this year than ever before. I feel like it's finally coming into focus. Again, I don't care if the focus is imperfect or even wrong. I deserve to be at least a spectator of the focusing process without being buried in academia.
