Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Explain the Book of Abraham


BYU_Boy

Recommended Posts

Posted

People, this is not hard to understand...

Joseph Smith could not translate egyption, and it has been proven in his fraudualnt translation of the BOA. These are FACTS people, facts.

Posted

Milkyway,

Firstly, it's "Egyptian", "Israel", "Pagan" and "fraudulent".

Secondly, you have not replied to my request for evidences. Let me repeat them here:

(1) Verify the authors of the Old Testament books attributed to Moses

(2) Verify the authors of the 4 New Testament Gospels

(3) Verify the authors of the Epistles attributed to Paul

(4) Give me the exact location of the original texts of the entire Old and New Testament

Let's see your evidence.

Lady Sundancer

Posted
People, this is not hard to understand...

Joseph Smith could not translate egyption, and it has been proven in his fraudualnt translation of the BOA. These are FACTS people, facts.

What, exactly, are you comparing the BoA to, in order to call it a fraud?

Posted
Because it is actaully based on FACTS as opposed to the outlandish mormon attempt to explain away such damning evidence.

Well, Milkyway, I really hate to throw a rock in your window and drive the thread off topic but in your spare time would you be so kind as to:

(1) Verify the authors of the Old Testament books attributed to Moses

(2) Verify the authors of the 4 New Testament Gospels

(3) Verify the authors of the Epistles attributed to Paul

(4) Give me the exact location of the original texts of the entire Old and New Testament

I await your evidence.

Lady Sundancer

This has nothing to do with the BOA whatsoever.

Posted
People, this is not hard to understand...

Joseph Smith could not translate egyption, and it has been proven in his fraudualnt translation of the BOA.  These are FACTS people, facts.

What, exactly, are you comparing the BoA to, in order to call it a fraud?

Im comparing it to any fraud. The translations made by smith are not the real translations at all. Therefore J smith has been proven fraudulent.

Posted
You're exactly right. It has to do with evidence.

Let's see it.

Lady Sundancer

he evidence has already been provided. You cant get much clearer in evidence then the stuff that has long since proven the BOA a fruad.

The translations made by smith are not what in reality the truly say at all.

Posted
You're exactly right. It has to do with evidence.

Let's see it.

Lady Sundancer

he evidence has already been provided. You cant get much clearer in evidence then the stuff that has long since proven the BOA a fruad.

The translations made by smith are not what in reality the truly say at all.

Let's see it then. Post it. Unless you are willing and able to supply the evidence I requested your assertions are no more solid than those of LDS here.

Lady Sundancer

Posted
Here this had pitures, so hopefully it will make sense to you lol (just kidding)

http://www.C***.org/lds/ldspapyri.htm

That's nice. Here is my request for evidences again.

(1) Verify the authors of the Old Testament books attributed to Moses

(2) Verify the authors of the 4 New Testament Gospels

(3) Verify the authors of the Epistles attributed to Paul

(4) Give me the exact location of the original texts of the entire Old and New Testament

Lady Sundancer

Posted
Here this had pitures, so hopefully it will make sense to you lol (just kidding)

http://www.C***.org/lds/ldspapyri.htm

That's nice. Here is my request for evidences again.

(1) Verify the authors of the Old Testament books attributed to Moses

(2) Verify the authors of the 4 New Testament Gospels

(3) Verify the authors of the Epistles attributed to Paul

(4) Give me the exact location of the original texts of the entire Old and New Testament

Lady Sundancer

Thats nice, but dont try a diversion tactic.

That has nothing to do with the fraud known as the BOA....

Posted
But Im pretty sure I can guess the response. The typical cry of "anti-mormon".

That my dear frineds is a defense mechanism

You won't hear cries of anti-Mormon from me. Still waiting for you to:

(1) Verify the authors of the Old Testament books attributed to Moses

(2) Verify the authors of the 4 New Testament Gospels

(3) Verify the authors of the Epistles attributed to Paul

(4) Give me the exact location of the original texts of the entire Old and New Testament

Lady Sundancer

Posted
But Im pretty sure I can guess the response.  The typical cry of "anti-mormon".

That my dear frineds is a defense mechanism

You won't hear cries of anti-Mormon from me. Still waiting for you to:

(1) Verify the authors of the Old Testament books attributed to Moses

(2) Verify the authors of the 4 New Testament Gospels

(3) Verify the authors of the Epistles attributed to Paul

(4) Give me the exact location of the original texts of the entire Old and New Testament

Lady Sundancer

Diversion tactics are useless,

Posted
Here this had pitures, so hopefully it will make sense to you lol (just kidding)

http://www.C***.org/lds/ldspapyri.htm

That's nice. Here is my request for evidences again.

(1) Verify the authors of the Old Testament books attributed to Moses

(2) Verify the authors of the 4 New Testament Gospels

(3) Verify the authors of the Epistles attributed to Paul

(4) Give me the exact location of the original texts of the entire Old and New Testament

Lady Sundancer

Thats nice, but dont try a diversion tactic.

That has nothing to do with the fraud known as the BOA....

It has everything to do with your assertions regarding the fraud of the Book of Abraham. Your assertion carries with it the implication that the scriptures that you hold to are superior and more well evidenced. So let's see it:

1) Verify the authors of the Old Testament books attributed to Moses

(2) Verify the authors of the 4 New Testament Gospels

(3) Verify the authors of the Epistles attributed to Paul

(4) Give me the exact location of the original texts of the entire Old and New Testament

Lady Sundancer

Posted

No it has apsolutly nothing to do with the BOA, the whereabouts of the Old testament writings has nothing to do with this,

The FACT is that we have the BOA the Papyri J smith wrote on. And it has been proven a fraud.

Posted
No it has apsolutly nothing to do with the BOA, the whereabouts of the Old testament writings has nothing to do with this,

The FACT is that we have the BOA the Papyri J smith wrote on. And it has been proven a fraud.

It has everything to do with viability of evidence. Let's see your superior evidence.

Lady Sundancer

Posted
There matbe evidence lacking to prove the infallibality of the Bible, maybe,

but it is nothing like the damning evidence we DO HAVE proving the BOA a fraud.

And how will we determine your new assertion unless you post the evidence for comparison?

Lady Sundancer

Posted

Gordon:

The BoA is canonized, and given to the world as if from the Lord, himself, so what is stated within IS infallible also.

Kerry:

Um, not quite. There is nothing saying because its in scripture that it is infallible. Even the BofM declares it possible to have mistakes within the pages of scripture.

Posted

Well the question I should be asking you is where is your evidence proving the BOA is not a fraud, or the BOM is true? Or better yet teh J smith was actually WAS a prophet?

Posted
Well the question I should be asking you is where is your evidence proving the BOA is not a fraud, or the BOM is true? Or better yet teh J smith was actually WAS a prophet?

Milkyway,

Is this post for me?

Lady Sundancer

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...