Mike Reed Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Mola, So all "hits" count as evidence, eh? Then do you want the rock my son found? I will sell it to you for a small price. Just pay $10 shipping and handling, and then you can have your very own BoM artifact! I am sure my son is willing to sell it. He is not nearly as impressed by such BoM "hits"as you are. But then again... He is only eleven years old.
altersteve Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Mola,So all "hits" count as evidence, eh? Then do you want the rock my son found? I will sell it to you for a small price. Just pay $10 shipping and handling, and then you can have your very own BoM artifact! I am sure my son is willing to sell it. He is not nearly as impressed by such BoM "hits"as you are. But then again... He is only eleven years old. He never said they count as evidence. But there's one more thing the Book of Mormon got right. "Alma" is a legitimate Hebrew name for a male, just as the Book of Mormon suggests.
Mike Reed Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 He never said they count as evidence. See post #20. Mola said, "The fact that there were males named Alma in the 19th century does not take away this **evidence** as you claim."
altersteve Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 See post #20. Mola said, "The fact that there were males named Alma in the 19th century does not take away this **evidence** as you claim."Sorry, missed that. I agree that this hardly counts as real, tangible "evidence," though. Still, it's something that cannot fairly be used against the Book of Mormon.
Recommended Posts