BofM Smithisms and 1 Nephi 10:8-10's reliance on the NT Gospels

[zerinus]

With you? I probably am. You lose every argument you make, so you stick to bald assertions.

So well known that hebrew speakers don't see it, and there are many counter arguments. I've shared several. There are many cases where it is not word for word.

So you think you are the only Hebrew speaker around? All those people who have written on the subject on the Internet and elsewhere affirming that the KJV is a very literal translation didn't know no Hebrew?

[volgadon]

So you think you are the only Hebrew speaker around? All those people who have written on the subject on the Internet and elsewhere affirming that the KJV is a very literal translation didn't know no Hebrew?

I suspect, that like yourself, the vast majority of them don't.

I also find it incredibly revealing that you won't discuss particulars, but stick to generalisations.

And another thing, double negatives are a feature of Russian grammar, but have no place in English.

[zerinus]

I suspect, that like yourself, the vast majority of them don't.

I also find it incredibly revealing that you won't discuss particulars, but stick to generalisations.

And another thing, double negatives are a feature of Russian grammar, but have no place in English.

I think you are just being argumentative. Nothing more to add.

[volgadon]

I think you are just being argumentative. Nothing more to add.

When I consider the source, this is the funniest thing I've read all week.