Chris Smith, on 01 December 2009 - 11:14 PM, said:
Unfortunately the papyri were encased in a Mylar sheath when I saw them, so taking thickness measurements was not possible. However, their encasement in Mylar had its advantages, since it meant I was able to take exact tracings of the edges of the papyri without fear of damaging the fragments. This will make for a far more accurate regression analysis.
I will say that from my visual observation of the fragments, it was quite clear that the Hor papyrus is thicker than the Ta-shere min papyrus. I'd guess that it was about twice as thick.
I will say that from my visual observation of the fragments, it was quite clear that the Hor papyrus is thicker than the Ta-shere min papyrus. I'd guess that it was about twice as thick.
`
Edited by William Schryver, 02 December 2009 - 01:39 PM.


This topic is locked

