Calm Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 (edited) This year's virtual conference will be streamed free on our YouTube channel this Friday evening (Oct. 11) and Saturday (Oct. 12). The theme is "Understanding and Defending the History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." If you can’t watch it live, I believe it’s available all weekend. More details are here: https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/conference/virt_2024-history-2 Very interested in seeing Ben Spackman’s presentation. Sarah Allen and Craig Foster’s presentations look interesting as well. While not something that grabs me, the others look worth the time. Edited October 14 by Calm 3 Link to comment
Dario_M Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 What a good news is this. I'm always on youtube so i would def cats some bits here and there about the conference. Link to comment
OGHoosier Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 Oh thank heavens they have abstracts. I agree, those three are the brightest lights. I'm also interested in Thompson - there were multiple Anthon transcripts? That's the kind of interesting out-there stuff I go for. 1 Link to comment
Calm Posted October 8 Author Share Posted October 8 1 hour ago, OGHoosier said: thank heavens they have abstracts. Lol, yes! Link to comment
Kenngo1969 Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 Picture me as Spock, with raised eyebrow: "Fascinating." Link to comment
Calm Posted October 14 Author Share Posted October 14 (edited) Ben Spackman’s talk is fascinating. Before the 1950, science is not dominant but more balanced with scripture/revelation, but the first presidency seek out help of two scientists for the statement on the Origin of Man; later these two are called as apostles along with another scientist/engineer. In 1911, they created a standing committee to work with a professor of geology at BYU who believes science and scripture will not conflict when properly understood. This professor believed in an old earth, evolution, death being around forever. They widely published a vetted talk given by Talmage, vetted heavily by the First Presidency and obviously based on this pro science POV. Published worldwide. OTOH, Joseph Fielding Smith who is trying to push his own inerrant scripture POV, science is irrelevant, can be understood best by a surface reading of scripture is getting ignored, rejected even. His talk opposing this view got published in the Utah Genealogical Society. He, however, is the Church Historian. And in the 1950s everything starts to get standardized. Joseph Fielding is on the committee for church manual. Science is dumped….scripture is errantly. Mark E. Petersen was called in the 40s and has a similar view. Also Bruce R. McConkie. So the first half of the century was much more progressive than the second though it started shifting back in late 1970s but really got going in 1990s. Now it is recognized overclaims were made. Edited October 14 by Calm 2 Link to comment
Dario_M Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 (edited) I'm sure it's gonna be fun. And educational. Edited October 14 by Dario_M Link to comment
Ragerunner Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Really enjoyed Ben’s talk. I hope the church starts shedding some of the incorrect baggage from the past. They could start with the Old Testament Institute manual. It’s loaded with a lot of ‘overclaimed’ quotes. 1 Link to comment
Calm Posted October 14 Author Share Posted October 14 1 hour ago, Ragerunner said: Really enjoyed Ben’s talk. I hope the church starts shedding some of the incorrect baggage from the past. They could start with the Old Testament Institute manual. It’s loaded with a lot of ‘overclaimed’ quotes. It has been imo the most problematic institute manual from the beginning of its existence…especially the Genesis section, I would have put it first on the list to get redone myself. I can only imagine they wanted to do it right and there is a lot of debate on how to approach it…but I wished they had just done an intermediate version that removed the poor scholarship even if it didn’t add anything of value. Just that would have been helpful. Instead we got another 20 years of students thinking this is what you have to believe to be a good Latter-day Saint 1 Link to comment
Ragerunner Posted October 15 Share Posted October 15 2 hours ago, Calm said: It has been imo the most problematic institute manual from the beginning of its existence…especially the Genesis section, I would have put it first on the list to get redone myself. I can only imagine they wanted to do it right and there is a lot of debate on how to approach it…but I wished they had just done an intermediate version that removed the poor scholarship even if it didn’t add anything of value. Just that would have been helpful. Instead we got another 20 years of students thinking this is what you have to believe to be a good Latter-day Saint Agree. I know it will require some ‘significant’ changes and I am sure that is part of the problem. But I really wish the Church would just ‘bit the bullet’ and make the changes. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now