Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

The 2008 Case when Californian Civil Rights trumped Religious Rights just prior to Prop 8


Pyreaux

Recommended Posts

Calm had wanted a link messaged to her, but messages to her can't be sent. So, here:

https://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/north-coast-womens-care-medical-group-v-san-diego-superior-court-33046

That is all I have, discuss if you want. Some said they never heard of it, and some disbelieved it. Here you go.

California gave homosexuals the right to marry, Proposition 8 did not remove any rights, except for the use of the word "marriage" to describe such unions. The equal protections remained in place, it was a fight over definition, it determined whether religions retained the right to be licensed by the state to preform essential and social services, as the North Coast Women's Care Medical Group Inc. case decided on 1 April 2008, those who are licensed by the State cannot treat homosexuals differently than heterosexuals. 

Edited by Pyreaux
Link to comment

I gritted my teeth and deleted some treasured messages so I can get more now.  Thanks for looking for me and the link.  :) 
 

I have bookmarked it for future reading so if mods want to delete this thread as political, works for me.  👍

Edited by Calm
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...