Jump to content

The Book of Daniel


gav

What think ye of the Book of Daniel?  

3 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you consider to the OT Book of Daniel in its current form?

    • Historical fiction like mainstream scholarly consensus concludes.
      0
    • Important inspired prophesy that should be taken very seriously.
    • Never really thought about it and why should I care.
      0
    • Found little value in it up till now.
      0
    • Other. Please elaborate...
      0
  2. 2. If significant value and applicability could be demonstrated, would you change your current position on the book of Daniel?

  3. 3. Can the the Book of Daniel shed light on Revelation and other apocalyptic scripture and visa versa?

    • Yes, substantially. Please elaborate, if so inclined.
    • No, not significantly.
      0
    • Doubtful, too much speculation on the subject of apocalyptic prophesy already exists.
      0


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, gav said:

Please check out the poll and comment if so inclined.

Whom has decided that the “Book of Daniel”, is fiction? Or rather who are the “mainstream scholars”, who have deemed it so, as many of it’s prophecies have been and are coming to pass, along with the many other Prophets who have spoken of it, and echoed it’s warnings. The Book of Isaiah, which also proclaims many of the same, and was quoted by Jesus Christ, extensively, and much of it backed up by the Book of Mormon, and all of our ancient and modern day Prophets. In short, looking for a “CFR”, as the term “mainstream scholars”, reminds me that of the scripture, (too paraphrase), “the day will come when men having  itching ears, will see teachers unto themselves”. Of course this scripture, or thought, can be applied to almost anyone, in any age”, but since this is an LDS website.  

Link to comment
38 minutes ago, Bill “Papa” Lee said:

Whom has decided that the “Book of Daniel”, is fiction? Or rather who are the “mainstream scholars”, who have deemed it so, as many of it’s prophecies have been and are coming to pass, along with the many other Prophets who have spoken of it, and echoed it’s warnings. The Book of Isaiah, which also proclaims many of the same, and was quoted by Jesus Christ, extensively, and much of it backed up by the Book of Mormon, and all of our ancient and modern day Prophets. In short, looking for a “CFR”, as the term “mainstream scholars”, reminds me that of the scripture, (too paraphrase), “the day will come when men having  itching ears, will see teachers unto themselves”. Of course this scripture, or thought, can be applied to almost anyone, in any age”, but since this is an LDS website.  

Quote

The Anchor Bible series offers new, book-by-book translations of the Old and New Testament and the Apocrypha, with commentary. This volume on the Book of Daniel has been prepared by two distinguished biblical scholars from the faculty of the Catholic University of America: Alexander A. Di Lella, Professor of Old Testament, and the late Louis F. Hartman, Professor of Semitic Languages.
The Book of Daniel was written as resistance literature, to strengthen and console loyal Jews of the second century B.C. who had to endure religious, economic, and social oppression at the hands of Antiochus I. The inspiring stories in which Daniel and his companions Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego survive the ordeals of the lions' den and the fiery furnace dramatize for believers of all time the ultimate test of faith--the willingness to risk one's life for one's beliefs.

The after the fact authorship as resistance literature explanation has been around since BC and is pretty much the standard among "biblical" scholars these days

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, gav said:

The after the fact authorship as resistance literature explanation has been around since BC and is pretty much the standard among "biblical" scholars these days

As have those seeking to water down, or cause other to have little Faith in the process of how Scripture is taught. In fact, those who have sought to cast doubt upon the “Word of God”, have been around since the “Garden of Eden”. This is prevalent within many past and present scholarly circles, because “heaven forbid”, if Scripture truly reflects the “mind and will of God”, that means he truly exists, and his laws and judgments carry eternal weight.  

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Similar Content

    • By Bernard Gui
      Others have probably already noted this, but here I compare 2 Nephi 26:1-8 (Nephi’s prophecy of the destruction that would follow the death of Jesus) with Mormon’s documentation of its fulfillment in 3 Nephi 8-10, including a review of the events in the words of Jesus. Mormon notes that this was the fulfillment of the words of the prophets in their scriptures (3 Nephi 10:11).
      I think the consistency in the details is remarkable considering the separation in time and text between the two accounts in the translation process. In some cases the words and order of events are exactly the same. Considering the fact that Joseph did not ask his scribes to review or reread passages to refresh his memory makes this even more intriguing. 
      If someone else has already written about this, I would like to look at it for comparison, but I am not aware that anyone has. Of course, I welcome your comments. Have at me!
       
      Calamities prophesied by Nephi (2 Nephi 26:1-8, in textual order): 
      A. the proud and wicked shall be burned up like stubble
      B. they will be swallowed up by the depths of the earth [by implication, also the sea]
      C. the mountains shall cover them
      D. whirlwinds will carry them away
      E. buildings shall fall on them, crush them to pieces, and grind them to powder
      F. thunderings
      G. lightnings
       H. earthquakes
      I.  all manner of destructions
      Calamities documented by Mormon (3 Nephi 8-10 in textual order and compared with Nephi’s order): 
      F. G. I. a great storm like no other previous storm
      F. G. I. a terrible tempest
      F. terrible thunder
      G. sharp lightening
      A. cities set on fire
      B. cities sunk into the sea 
      C. cities sunk and covered by earth and mountains
       F. G. I. tempests
      D. whirlwinds
      F. thunderings
      G. lightning
      H. quaking of the earth
      A. B. C. E. F. H. cities sunk, burned, shaken
      E. buildings fall to the earth and inhabitants killed
      I. many great destructions
      The voice of Jesus before His appearance to the Nephites explaining the destruction of the wicked (3 Nephi 9:1-12) compared with Nephi and Mormon’s lists:
      - those who perished did so because of their wickedness and abomination (casting out, stoning, and killing the saints and prophets)
      -the blood of the prophets cried out to Him against them
      -A. cities and inhabitants were burned by fire
      -B. cities and inhabitants were sunk into the sea
      -C. cities and inhabitants were covered with earth
      -B. I. cities and inhabitants were flooded
      -I. there were other great destructions
      Mormon's (3 Nephi 10:12-14) instructions to the Nephites that the righteous who were saved:
      -B. C. were not sunken and buried in the earth
      - I. were not drowned in the sea
      -A. were not burned by fire
      -C. E. were not fallen upon and crushed to death
      -D. were not carried away in the whirlwind
      -I. were not overpowered by the vapor of smoke and darkness [suffocated]
      Other similar details between  2 Nephi 26 and Mormon 3 Nephi 8-10:
      Nephi:
      -1. the wicked will perish because they will cast out, stone, and slay the saints and prophets
      -2. The blood of the saints will cry to the Lord against the wicked
      -3. the righteous will not perish
      -4. Christ will apear to them after the destruction
      -5.  Christ shall heal them
      -6. They will have peace for three and four generations, but then will come unparalleled destruction 
      Mormon:
      -1. the righteous who were saved did not cast out, stone, or shed the blood of the prophets
      -2. the blood of the saints and prophets came up to the Lord
      -3. the righteous did not perish
      -4. Jesus appeared to the people after this great destruction
      -5. Jesus healed and taught them
      -6. They had peace for three and four generations, but then came unparalleled destruction
      In review, Mormon asks the reader to search the scriptures to see if these things were not also predicted by the prophets Jacob, Zenos, and Zenock  (3 Nephi 10:14-17):
      -death and destruction by fire, tempests, whirlwind, and opening of the earth
    • By cdowis
      CRITIC
      The prophecy actually says that war shall be poured out upon all nations, starting in South Carolina. That did not happen.
      RESPONSE
      And that is exactly what happened, , beginning with the war that started in South Carolina. 
      The technology and tactics developed in the Civil War made a world war possible == using railroads for logistics and troop movement, air war (beginning with observation balloons), trench warfare, iron sided warships, submarines, Sherman's march (the first time civilians were directly attacked)
       
    • By BookofMormonLuvr
      Now that I have had a day to calm done and think, I would like to apologize for becoming heated, and discuss what I believe was behind my becoming upset.

      It seems when eschatology is brought up among LDS, that they mock and guffaw at the ideas of people who are trying to tie last days events with scriptural prophecy, seeming to be content dismissing other's sincere ideas with offering any alternative view.

      So my questions are:

      Do LDS have a cohesive and comprehensive view of eschatology? 

      If so, what are those?

      What alternative ideas can you offer to those who's views you just dismissed as crazy?
    • By BookofMormonLuvr
      I am hoping there will be a few interested in this topic...

      Jim Staley is a good, level-headed, teacher, and I would enourage you to watch the whole presentation- but I want to focus in on CERN. His comments on CERN begin at about the 19:10 mark.

      As LDS we believe that God doesn't use magic, but higher laws of science in doing that thing He does. Is it possible that if man, through applied science, is able to "tap into" the dark dimension, that the LORD would allow it because they have sought it- and that CERN could possibly play a part in releasing captive demons for a pre-Second coming battle, that would cause total and utter chaos?

      Thoughts.


       
    • By mass168
      Was the commanded/prophesied temple spoken of in D&C 115 retracted anywhere in scripture? I know some people try to apply D&C 124:51 as an answer. To my understanding though, Far West was not in Jackson County at the time in question?
×
×
  • Create New...