Jump to content
Seriously No Politics ×

Will Scientists Create New Life In The Lab?


Life   

10 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you believe that scientists will create new life in the lab?

    • Yes, using natural processes
      6
    • No, only God can create life
      4
  2. 2. If Scientists create life in the Lab, will a spirit get inside it?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      5


Recommended Posts

Posted

Humans create new life all the time, their children, they do have a spirit.

There is nothing new about children. Their parents are simply reproducing themselves.
Posted (edited)

There is nothing new about children. Their parents are simply reproducing themselves.

 

You missed my point, humans do not reproduce spirits, spirits come from heaven. 

 

Do you believe that scientists will create life in the lab? Yes or No? 

If they create new life, will a spirit get inside it? 

 

I am not talking about creating spirits. 

Edited by MormonFreeThinker
Posted

Life is a spirit, and anything without a spirit is dead.

And nobody can create any new kind of spirit.

 

Hmmm... what about cloning?  That seems to be a successful practice with sheep, like "Dolly" etc.   Years ago when this was news, I always thought there must be someone in a basement lab somewhere trying to clone humans.  There may be someone today still trying... the process is pretty well established, at least for animals.  There's not much news about cloning anymore.

 

GG

Posted

Hmmm... what about cloning?  That seems to be a successful practice with sheep, like "Dolly" etc.   Years ago when this was news, I always thought there must be someone in a basement lab somewhere trying to clone humans.  There may be someone today still trying... the process is pretty well established, at least for animals.  There's not much news about cloning anymore.

 

GG

 

That was not creating it was making an exact reproduction of existing life.

Posted

You missed my point, humans do not reproduce spirits, spirits come from heaven. 

 

Do you believe that scientists will create life in the lab? Yes or No? 

If they create new life, will a spirit get inside it? 

 

I am not talking about creating spirits. 

 

What would you consider as creating life?  How would such a process work?

Posted

You missed my point, humans do not reproduce spirits, spirits come from heaven.

I think you're hung up on the word human, and you don't realize our spirit is our life and that we have the spirit/life that we have because of who, not really where, we came from. So yes our kind of being does produce spirits and we reproduce the same kind as we are.

Do you believe that scientists will create life in the lab? Yes or No?

That's a tricky question to answer with only a yes or a no. Substitute the word spirit for life, because that's what life is, and you'll see part of the problem. And then think about how a male scientists could have sexual relations with a female scientist in a lab, or get a male and female of another kind of being to have sexual relations in a lab. Even that wouldn't guarantee they would be able to reproduce life of a certain kind in a lab, though, but if they did it still wouldn't be a "new" kind of life.

If they create new life, will a spirit get inside it?

Let me put it this way. If they created a body a spirit could feasibly choose to enter it and in doing so give life to that body.

I am not talking about creating spirits.

I think you don't realize you are.
Posted

Test tube human babies have been around for a while now.

So would you say scientists have already created life itself? Or new kinds of life? Humans have been around for a while now too.
Posted

I do believe in a God that obeys the laws of physics 

From my old Fundamentalist Evangelical days, I once heard a man speak about a so called Jewish story about the end of days. It went something like this: Man first created a doll. then he did things to it and it mimicked life. It first said, Master, then Brother, then Servant, meaning that it would first serve humanity then be our equal then this "Golum" would rule us.  Another story that circulated around the same time was, "The Ashes of the Red Heifer". My old denomination was very into fantasy theology.

Posted

That was not creating it was making an exact reproduction of existing life.

 

Yes, but doesn't the clone have to have a spirit of its own?  Where does that come from? It can't be separate and alive and not have a spirit...

 

GG

Posted

Yes, but doesn't the clone have to have a spirit of its own? Where does that come from? It can't be separate and alive and not have a spirit...

GG

I'm interested in what EBayR will say too.
Posted

Yes on both cause I was created in a lab and I am spiritual.

Posted

I think you're hung up on the word human, and you don't realize our spirit is our life and that we have the spirit/life that we have because of who, not really where, we came from. So yes our kind of being does produce spirits and we reproduce the same kind as we are.

 

We do not know if a spirit is required for all life. A spirit is required for human, animal, and plant life, but we do not know about other creatures. 

 

Let me put it this way. If they created a body a spirit could feasibly choose to enter it and in doing so give life to that body.

 

Okay, do you believe that scientists will create a body for a spirit? 

Posted

We do not know if a spirit is required for all life. A spirit is required for human, animal, and plant life, but we do not know about other creatures.

You seem determined to ignore what I'm telling you about how a spirit is life, and that there is no life without a spirit. No spirit = no living being.

Okay, do you believe that scientists will create a body for a spirit?

If they do they will have to use a male and a female, or their equivalent, to make it.
Posted

Yes, but doesn't the clone have to have a spirit of its own?  

 

GG

Just like identical twins do.

Posted

there is no life without a spirit.

How do you know? 

 

 

You seem determined to ignore what I'm telling you about how a spirit is life

 

I agree that spirit is life, but I do not know if all life is a spirit. 

 

 

If they do they will have to use a male and a female, or their equivalent, to make it.

 

So you do not believe scientists will create a body in the lab. 

Posted

Yes, but doesn't the clone have to have a spirit of its own?  Where does that come from? It can't be separate and alive and not have a spirit...

 

GG

I do not know of any human clones that are old enough to show if they have a spirit. I don't doubt that someone will clone a human.

Posted

How do you know?

We don't really need to get into all of that. Just take what I'm telling you as me telling you what I know.

I agree that spirit is life, but I do not know if all life is a spirit.

It may be a little bit more technically correct to think of the life in a living being to be coming from the spirit that is in the body, rather than to think all life is a spirit.

Consider roadkill, for example. At one time that critter was alive, but then the life went out of it when it was killed on the road. The body is still there, but something is missing. The life, or spirit, is not there.

Or consider a baby born in what is called still birth, fresh from the womb, with no injury apparent in the body. It was just born not breathing, indicating the life, or the spirit, wasn't in it.

The thing that gives life to a body is the thing we refer to as a spirit, and with no spirit there is no life.

So you do not believe scientists will create a body in the lab.

I will say they can if they can do what it requires.
Posted (edited)

Just like identical twins do.

 

Yes, if each identical twin is separate and alive, each identical twin has it's own spirit, not a shared spirit. 

 

GG

Edited by Garden Girl
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...