Rain Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 DS lost his recommend that he got in another ward prior to this one. He called the exec. sec. who told him to see a counselor on Sunday. My impression was that youth were always supposed to see the bishop for a recommend, but I can't find it in handbook 2. Am I just a bad searcher, is it in handbook 1 or am I wrong about him needing to see the bishop? Link to comment
ksfisher Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 It would either be in Handbook 2 or in the instruction in the temple recommend book itself. I've never heard that it needs to be the bishop. The counselors in my ward will give youth recommends. Link to comment
Calm Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 I thought the first interview for one's own endowment had to be the bishop, but other than that. Link to comment
Kenngo1969 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 I thought this was going to be another one of those "I'm-a-parent-and-I-need-to-hear-the-gory-details-as-he-delivers-them-to-the-Bishop" threads (a bad idea, because legally, it may destroy the confidentiality of the confessional if something potentially criminal is discussed) ... Aaaaaaaaaaanyway ... Carry on! 1 Link to comment
ksfisher Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 I thought the first interview for one's own endowment had to be the bishop, but other than that. In my ward the bishop takes care of interviews for people with expired recommends, the counselors everyone else. I'm not aware of any church policy that says this, but it seems to be a nice arrangement that works for the bishopric. Link to comment
Calm Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 (edited) Mine was expired and I saw a counselor so local policy, definitely makes sense. Edited July 3, 2014 by calmoriah Link to comment
bluebell Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 In our ward one of the counselors took care of my 12 year old son's first recommend. Link to comment
ERayR Posted July 4, 2014 Share Posted July 4, 2014 DS lost his recommend that he got in another ward prior to this one. He called the exec. sec. who told him to see a counselor on Sunday. My impression was that youth were always supposed to see the bishop for a recommend, but I can't find it in handbook 2. Am I just a bad searcher, is it in handbook 1 or am I wrong about him needing to see the bishop? Councilors can do youth temple recommends. The Bishop is required to do an annual and a semi-annual interview with each of the youth in his ward. Link to comment
Rain Posted July 4, 2014 Author Share Posted July 4, 2014 Thank you. Y'all make my laugh. Link to comment
rongo Posted July 4, 2014 Share Posted July 4, 2014 (edited) The most recent handbook included many changes allowing counselors to do things previously done by bishops, such as baptismal interviews and patriarchal blessing interviews. Limited use recommends for temple are included. I haven't been a bishop for two years, but as best I recall, bishops are supposed to do TR interviews for people who have been in the ward for less than a year. Of course, this isn't a rule that it would be the end of the world for if a counselor were to renew a recommend for a new person, lost recommend, etc. That's just the current "way it's supposed to be" intent. Edited July 4, 2014 by rongo Link to comment
Calm Posted July 4, 2014 Share Posted July 4, 2014 A bit to obsessive in our need to help perhaps? I think all of us feeling we had something to contribute scared bookisblue away….she did read a lot before she left though it would seem. Link to comment
rongo Posted July 4, 2014 Share Posted July 4, 2014 ERayR: bishops are supposed to do annual youth interviews; counselors can do the semi-annual ones. Of course, the bishop could do all of them, if he wanted to or it worked out that way. Link to comment
ERayR Posted July 4, 2014 Share Posted July 4, 2014 ERayR: bishops are supposed to do annual youth interviews; counselors can do the semi-annual ones. Of course, the bishop could do all of them, if he wanted to or it worked out that way. I stand corrected. Thanks. Link to comment
Recommended Posts