Jump to content

Jim Harmstrom Is Dead..


BookofMormonLuvr

Recommended Posts

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56525075-78/church-harmston-tlc-christ.html.csp

* An interesting point is made at the end of the article. Jim, who claimed to be the reincarnated Joseph Smith, died on the same day Joseph died in 1844. Unfortunately, that fact will probably only embolden his followers to "stay to course." and put Jim in even higher esteem in their eyes. *

Link to comment

Do they actually believe he was the prophet reincarnated or is this ex member of their community just saying they will because of his death date.

They actually do believe it, I read it from their own materials when they had a functioning webpage. They believe in a concpet called "Multiple Mortal Probations". I'll see if I can't find a way-back type site that might have some stuff archived.

Link to comment

They actually do believe it, I read it from their own materials when they had a functioning webpage. They believe in a concpet called "Multiple Mortal Probations". I'll see if I can't find a way-back type site that might have some stuff archived.

I think this doctrine would depress me. I do not want to come back and do this again.

Link to comment

Jim Harmston was an odd fellow. He preached the doctrine of "multiple mortal probations" which Orson Whitney believed in (also Eliza Snow, I think). He taught that he was Joseph Smith, re-born into a new probation. He condemned modern GAs for extending priesthood to blacks, and seemed to have special animosity towards Prez Hinckley, in fact he said Prez Hinckley's punishment when he died would be to be born into a new probation as a black. Of course he also had lots of wives. That's the first thing these fundamentalists always bring back and preach the loudest--although (as Tribune article notes, tongue in cheek) "it has nothing to do with sex".

Link to comment

They actually do believe it, I read it from their own materials when they had a functioning webpage. They believe in a concpet called "Multiple Mortal Probations". I'll see if I can't find a way-back type site that might have some stuff archived.

Oddly enough, I once considered the notion that one lifetime isn't enough testing, especially since so many lifetimes are so short. Combine the multiverse theory, and my thought was that I was actually being tested in tens of thousands of universes in order to see if I were worthy.

I finally decided that it was a nice Sci-Fi style notion, but it was full of baloney. The first problem is, would Christ need to do the Atonement in all of them, or only one of them. Since it is obvious He would only need to do it once, and He did it here, chance favors that there IS only one universe. I decided that God the Father doesn't NEED to test us ten thousand times, because he has access to our innermost selves in a way that not even we ourselves do. He knows me. That's all He needs.

Link to comment

I think this doctrine would depress me. I do not want to come back and do this again.

According to MY theory, you would not come back because you're doing all of them right this second. And you're compartmentalized; the portion of You that is here thinks it is all by itself. Your consolidated You is distributed and unaware of it. When you're done with it all, You are then reintegrated and you remember all of your Yous. And what they did.

And like I said, MY theory is false doctrine. And this guy Harmstrom's is, too. Unfortunate that he has dragged so many people with him into error.

Link to comment

I should set record straight about what Harmston said. It wasn't Pres Hinckley but BKP he was talking about. From SL Tribune article:

Take, for example, Harmston’s tirade against LDS leadership.

``Let me tell you what, those hypocritical jackasses will be called into accountability,’’ Harmston, dressed in a crisp white shirt and bolo tie, told the congregation during his Feb. 23 sermon.

``And those great, big elders, like Boyd K. Packer, who demands that the people rise when he enters the room, will be taken down,’’ Harmston, a burly man with slicked-back gray hair, gray beard and jet-black eyebrows, rants in rich cadence.

``He will be called into accountability, but I tell you in the name of the living God, that man’s skin is going to be turned as black as coal before he makes his departure. And how do I know that? Because I am the one that’s going to make it that way! Because God will not be mocked any longer!’’

A true nutcase...kind of comical but for all of the people he scammed.

Link to comment
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Oh and when did Pres Packer ever demand anyone stand when he entered the room?

I've been in a meeting in a small room (in a chapel, not in a temple, in case anyone's wondering) with President Packer and he most assuredly did not demand that we stand for him. He even instructed us to not stand up for the opening prayer.

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56525075-78/church-harmston-tlc-christ.html.csp

* An interesting point is made at the end of the article. Jim, who claimed to be the reincarnated Joseph Smith, died on the same day Joseph died in 1844. Unfortunately, that fact will probably only embolden his followers to "stay to course." and put Jim in even higher esteem in their eyes. *

A question...

Would it not be simpler to be yourself and to convince you were called as was Joseph, or called to a new dispensation? Joseph gave us so much scripture; how could anyone hope to claim to be him.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Similar Content

    • By nuclearfuels
      https://www.sltrib.com/news/2019/09/11/robert-gehrke-utah-should/comments/#twt-comments
      Surprised to see the Trib advocate this but here we are.
      My own take on the issue: the gov't of UT and State Supreme Court won't legalize polygamy at all.
      It won't really matter though, some US state (MN?) will legalize it after Canada does (following Kenya, other African countries, Denmark which already have), and based on freedom of religion (not the freedom of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints, no; but the freedom of religious practice of other groups.
      Wondering though when we might hear an announcement about this in General Conference, 5, 10 20 years? 
       
       
       
    • By nuclearfuels
      Kenya legalized polygamy in 2014.  Any readers here serve mission there and have to tell investigators they'd need to stop the practice before being able to be baptized? I understand in Latin America a lot of married people split up but forgo the legal part of making the divorce official and that has to be done before they can be baptized.
      Germany is trying to indirectly legalize polygamy for one of their migrant culture's beliefs. 
      My wife and I support our ancestors who practiced polygamy, to say nothing of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob practicing polygamy.
      Curious as to your thoughts:
      Will other African countries and European countries following suit? Will / Should people in Congress - Ilhan, Tlaib, Romney, Bishop, etc. allow migrants here to practice what their faith encourages?  Declining populations (Japan, Europe) really have two options: welcome in higher fertility populations from other countries or legalize polygamy. 
       
      Pushed by politicians, polygamy enjoys a heyday among Christians in ...
      Germany: Citizenship for Polygamous Migrants?  
    • By SouthernMo
      The timeline and reasons of how the idea of polygamy evolved into practice is perplexing.  It is causing me doubt how scriptures are to be obeyed, and how to trust the revelatory process.  Let's look at the pattern Joseph Smith followed:
      March 1830 - Joseph Smith publishes the Book of Mormon (supposedly scripture) which contains commandments from God.  The only discussion of polygamy is found in Jacob 2, which clearly condemns the practice.  However, there is a provision given for exceptions: only to 'raise up seed' if God commands it.
      The Gospel Topics Essay on Plural Marriage in Kirtland and Nauvoo states that "After receiving a revelation commanding him to practice plural marriage, Joseph Smith married multiple wives and introduced the practice to close associates."  The only revelation I know of on polygamy came in July 1843 (D&C 132), yet Joseph Smith had married 22 (by some count) additional wives by July 1843.
      2 Big Questions:
      1. What revelation did Joseph Smith receive (per the mentioned Gospel Topic Essay) before the D&C 132 revelation that told him to practice polygamy, despite the Book of Mormon's 1830 prohibition (with exception)?
      2. In light of the Jacob 2:30 provision for the allowance of polygamy to "raise up seed unto me..." why are there no (known) children that emerged from Joseph Smith's plural wives?  Joseph apparently did not use polygamy to 'raise up seed.'
    • By HappyJackWagon
      I want to respond to a couple of statements made by Julianne from the now closed "Weed" thread, because she absolutely nails it. She is spot on and I think the discussion at this level needs to occur before any progress can be made on the SSM issue.
      She wrote...
      Speaking as a straight, white, man, I recognize that I come to the traditional church teachings of priesthood, sealing, polygamy/polyandry, and SSM from a certain privileged position. The church's teachings and practices benefit me and they always have. Even though there is little to no evidence for how celestial families will actually be organized and function in the CK I used to think I had it all figured out. Obviously, I thought, marriage is essential to have legal physical intimacy which is necessary for creating offspring with one or multiple wives. Yet there is no firm teaching about how spirits are created. Are they born like a baby is born into mortality? There is no evidence or teaching for that, but it is widely assumed. That assumption then justifies polygamy while discrediting polyandry and even SSM. After all, if the entire purpose is to create spirit offspring and it is thought that it happens in a way similar to creating biological offspring, then it makes sense. But that is ALL based on assumptions.
      Based on these assumptions many are willing to condemn others to lives (and possibly even an eternity) of loneliness.
      So (we) don't even know what the afterlife looks like. It is unknown. Yet we think (we) have enough information to condemn and judge others, and since most of us come at it from positions of privilege, we are in the position to enforce our dogma upon the less privileged. The church is not unique in behaving this way. It is how society has always worked. But recognizing the assumptions for what they are and being humble about how much we really don't know, can help society improve.
      Julianne also stated...
      How can one categorically dismiss SSM when there is little to nothing known about family organization in the next life, even regarding a variety of heterosexual family organizations. Which sealings will be valid? Polygamy/polyandry? Only those which benefit men? Who are the children sealed to? There is a lot of "The Lord will work it out" mentality, which is fine because it acknowledges a lack of understanding and knowledge. The problem comes when one then loses all humility and attempts to define how family relationships will or will not work for other people. I agree with Julianne that the polygamy/polyandry topic is closely tied to the SSM topic and must be ironed out.
      So maybe this can be a thread that can be commented on instead of derailing other threads when this subject comes up.
       
      *Julianne, I hope I didn't misunderstand or misrepresent you. I really appreciated where you were trying to take the discussion.
    • By DBMormon
      Knowing the background of the Lucy Walker story (if you don't, I can not emphasize enough the need to understand the story - resources below), I am curious how those who both know the story and who are faithful to the restoration and Church authority answer the following question.
      Do you take the position that Joseph deceived Lucy Walker about God commanding him to take her as a plural wife, or do you subscribe to a God whose morality has him commanding a man in a father/daughter dynamic to change his relationship with this 16 year old girl living in his home effectively as his foster daughter into a husband/wife dynamic? I am also open to other perspectives that hold some other ground but wood tool answers will not be acceptable in this post (have faith, God will work it out on the other side, go pray about it and get your own answer knowing people get competing answers)
      The question is not how does someone other than yourself come down or arrive at a perspective on this question but rather where do you personally come down on this question. I am deeply hoping that you wont avoid all-together or avoid using the mechanism that you know by the spirit that the Church is true hence you don't concern yourself with such conundrums. Instead what is your personal take on this historical issue.
      While this historical story has been largely ignored, I think it is the most important story in all of Mormonism. bigger than the Book of Abraham, bigger than Helen Mar Kimball and Fanny Alger, bigger than first vision accounts, and Race and Priesthood.
      http://www.mormondiscussionpodcast.org/2017/12/premium-lucy-walker-spiritual-experiences/
      http://www.yearofpolygamy.com/tag/lucy-walker-smith/
      http://www.wivesofjosephsmith.org/23-LucyWalker.htm
      http://josephsmithspolygamy.org/plural-wives-overview/lucy-walker/
×
×
  • Create New...