Jump to content

Olmec Donald

Members
  • Posts

    325
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Texas
  • Interests
    Agriculture

Recent Profile Visitors

639 profile views

Olmec Donald's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • One Month Later
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Week One Done
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

437

Reputation

  1. Would there be back-pay (preferably with interest) for former Seminary teachers? Asking for a friend...
  2. The two stormtroopers next to the wreckage of the Tie Fighter - their uniforms are wrong. They should be wearing pilot uniforms.
  3. I don't think it's about coercion; I think synchronization is related to whatever process results in the inhabitants of a Zion becoming "of one heart and one mind." By way of example, this message board is a place where often highly asynchronous people interact and have effects on one another. One of the results is that we become more understanding of those we started out strongly in disagreement with. This doesn't always happen, but it has happened to me in the few months I've been here, and I assume it has happened for others as well. It would probably take either an extremely long time (average lifespans in the days of Enoch) OR a universal transformational event (the visit of Christ in Third Nephi) for a Zion society to develop, but the process may still show up among us in some ways. Yeah, it's probably more complicated than what I wrote. There will probably be synchronization of those on the path of light, as well as synchronization of those on the path of darkness, simultaneously. What we are seeing with the LDS church emphasizing its Christianity and de-emphasizing its peculiarity may be part of that process. Imo the prayer circle in the Temple is an example of voluntary and deliberate synchronization. Likewise "where two or more are gathered in my name." In think it's a general principle that shows up in many places, even if the word itself is unfamiliar. I agree with you that synchronization offers an avenue of influence for those who choose to act, and I think this influence can be far more powerful than is implied by the metronome or hand-clapping examples in my opening post.
  4. Synchronization is a phenomenon whereby two or more similar systems which are loosely connected influence one another until their behaviors are in alignment. The classic example is multiple asynchronous metronomes on a platform which can move. The impetus of the individual metronomes is transmitted to the platform, and the platform moves in the direction of the summed impetus (effectively in the direction supported by the majority). In turn this movement of the platform slightly changes the speed of those metronomes which are not in alignment with the movement of the platform, such that their behavior is shifted slightly towards alignment, the process continuing until synchronization has occurred. Spontaneous synchronization can also occur between people! Watch this clip for about one minute: From the narration: "This phenomenon of synchronization... occurs at every scale of nature... it uses every communication channel that nature has ever devised... any way that two things can influence each other, nature uses that to get things in synch." The people of planet earth are becoming connected, albeit loosely, to one another. This is true on the physical plane thanks to things like smart phones and social media (and may be true on a non-physical plane but that would be difficult to provide evidence for). Thus there is a heightened possibility of us influencing one another. Recall the "phase transition" in the behavior of the audience in the clip - there may be a point at which these many small mutual influences synchronize into a phase transition. So hypothetically suppose a powerful nation invaded a weak nation and morality was against the powerful nation, and the majority of people on the planet felt that way, perhaps even felt strongly that way. If the postulated loose interconnectedness which exists on planet earth today includes those soldiers in the invading army, over time their moral compasses and/or behavior might synchronize with the majority of the planet, and they would lose the desire to make war. Maybe not every single individual, but perhaps enough to effect a "phase transition". I'm not saying we're there yet, but if the inhabitants of planet earth are indeed evolving in that direction, imo that would be a good thing. Perhaps through synchronization the meek (i.e. the gentle and the peaceful) will inherit the earth.
  5. "Kiev" by Renaissance, 1972: A couple more from the same album, Renaissance - Sounds Of The Sea - YouTube and Renaissance - Rajah Khan (Full) - YouTube
  6. The text arguably implies that it was an actual physical struggle, since the angel injured Jacob's hip socket and caused him to limp.
  7. "My kingdom is not of this world." - Jesus Christ
  8. That would definitely get me back to church. And I would get over all my little doctrinal hang-ups before the first note faded. My understanding is that the Dead toured with two such systems, because it took so long to set up and take down. While they were playing in one city, the other system was being trucked to/set up in the next city.
  9. The effects of early reflections on proximity, localization, and loudness - YouTube Based on my understanding of the way such terms are generally used, I think they normally refer to two different things: A "line array" is a closely-spaced vertical stack of loudspeaker elements and is usually placed at the front of the room. A system made up of speakers that "run the length of the room" would presumably be multiple individual loudspeakers at different distances from the microphone, with the signal to each loudspeaker (hopefully!) delayed by a small amount of time corresponding to the time it takes for sound to travel from the podium to that location. Of the two approaches, imo the line array is the more promising, assuming good quality units. The problem with multiple delayed loudspeakers is, there will be areas in the room with acceptable intelligibility and areas with poor intelligibility, the latter being at distances in between two speakers with different delay times. With both approaches one of the issues is multiple early arrival times, but it's potentially worse with the multiple delayed speakers. The ear/brain system relies heavily on overtone patterns for speech intelligibility, and if the overtones are smeared or scrambled the ear/brain system has to focus harder (and longer) to decipher individual words. (In case this subject interests you: The perception of Presence in Halls, Operas, and Classrooms - part 1 - YouTube ; The perception of Presence in Halls, Operas, and Classrooms - part2 - YouTube ; The effects of early reflections on proximity, localization, and loudness - YouTube ) Neither line arrays nor multiple delayed loudspeakers will address poor room acoustics directly, nor can equalization. Acoustic problems call for acoustic solutions, and again those are most cost-effective to implement in the design stage, rather than after the room has been finished. Most of the sound that anyone anywhere in the room hears will be reverberant sound, which means that it will be affected not only by the room's acoustic properties (shape and materials), but also by the off-axis response of the loudspeakers. Good off-axis response tends to be expensive and involve somewhat wider loudspeaker enclosures, and thus is easier to incorporate at the initial room design stage than to add as an afterthought. It is of course quite possible that the acoustic design of chapels has improved since I was active LDS, I hope so anyway.
  10. Some of the worst acoustics I've encountered have been in LDS chapels. Not that this is something most people even notice, but let me explain why I think it matters: The ear/brain system has limited capacity to process information, and when the reverberation is too strong, it takes MORE attention and MORE time to decipher individual words. So by the time the ear/brain system has discerned one word, the speaker has moved on to the next word. This has two effects: The first is, it is difficult for the listener to piece together complex thoughts from the individual words, and then to put those complex thoughts into long-term memory, because TOO MUCH of the brain's limited attention is devoted to simply understanding the individual words. Second, it is very tiring for the brain to have to concentrate so hard on the task of understanding words, so after ten or fifteen minutes the brain is burned out and the listener is exhausted. The imo best solution is to hire an acoustician preferably in the building design phase, because this is the sort of thing that is easier to prevent than to cure. (The most obvious place where this phenomenon arises is in lecture halls at colleges and universities, and there your only hope is to sit in the front of the hall. The students in the back of the hall not only have poor retention but also are more likely to get a headache and/or fall asleep, and it's NOT because they are lazy, but because the acoustics are dreadful and they have to devote too much of their inherently limited cognitive capacity to the task of understanding the individual words. So tell your kids and grandkids to sit in the front of the class because speech intelligibility - and therefore comprehension and retention - is likely to suffer enormously if they do not.) My day job involves acoustics and psychoacoustics, hence my heightened awareness in this area.
  11. What if when the curtain comes down we see that it was a play, a REALLY convincing and educational play, and that nothing real has been lost? What if a person cannot achieve mastery while simultaneously holding someone else - or oneself! - in condemnation? Will treasuring condemnation then be worth its cost? What if all ancient hatreds can be healed and become present loves? I do realize how unrealistic that sounds, and maybe from where we are right now the best we can do is offer a little willingness.
  12. Imo there are little hints sprinkled in unexpected places. Here's one of them: "Row row row your boat" Whose boat are you supposed to row? Your own. Is somebody else supposed to row it for you? No. "Gently" Are we supposed to be in conflict with those around us? No. "down the stream" Not upstream, against the natural current? No. "Merrily merrily merrily merrily" Almost sounds like, "men (and women) are that they might have joy". "Life is but a dream."
  13. ^^This.^^ All wounds will be healed, such that what remains from our mortal experience is wisdom and understanding. All things will have worked together for not only our good, but also for the good all. Rather than condemning one another for our mistakes, I think we will be grateful to one another for the roles we played.
  14. In general support of the cafeteria approach: If you assume things are true by convention, which is actually what most people do, then it's difficult to gain insight into how things might be bettered. - Elon Musk When we all think alike, then no one is thinking. - Walter Lippmann Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively. - The Dalai Lama
  15. I thank you for the polite wording you chose to express your skepticism. I was replying to someone who is apparently a believer in LDS teachings, and was thinking of the scripture in the D&C (section 130 I think) that talks about "all things past, present, and future" being "continually manifest". So I was attempting to speak "Mormon". Obviously that's not going to constitute "evidence" to someone who does not accept the LDS scriptures. Nor is my wording necessarily precise, even within an LDS paradigm. If I was trying to make a case for things like locality and time being very different "beyond the earth plane" to someone who is agnostic and skeptical, oboy that would be an uphill battle. Does "beyond the earth plane" (or something beyond what we can presently observe) even exist? I believe there is "evidence" of such which does not rely on religion, some of it in the form of near-death experience accounts, including the following from atheist/agnostic medical experts in relevant fields: Here is a neurologist describing her near-death experience: https://youtu.be/-IuJKabyx_g?t=55 And, here is a neurosurgeon describing his: https://youtu.be/qbkgj5J91hE?t=1020 My own belief that there is something beyond our normal physical-world reality is based more on personal experience than on other people's experiences, but I doubt that such would have any credibility here because I can bring neither credentialed expertise nor documentation. Just for the record, I respect your skeptical and analytical approach. And I likewise have great respect for the purity and practicality of a morality which is based on neither the hope of reward nor the fear of punishment, but rather is free to seek and embrace what I would call Light without the need for reconciliation with an external creed or dogma.
×
×
  • Create New...