marineland

I never heard about that.

There is no "had done". "Do" is present tense. Where do you see a married Christ?

"Creating other planets" is the more appropriate term.

Or he might give up his current planet to one of his other brother Gods.

Did the Father atone for the sins of Heavenly Mother?

Where does it say "the Father had done" part? Does Jesus have relations with a wife to produce spirit children when he says this?

Do you believe they were false or true doctrines?

Apart from Heavenly Father, who lives on a planet near Kolob?

Which of the provided teachings by the OP were worded as speculation or opinion? Is this the same for General Conference sermons in our era - the speakers are giving speculation and opinion?

Every male God will have his own planet then?

In this particular case where do you see them teaching what they did as speculation or personal ideas?

Does Heavenly Father have a planet separate from all other Gods before him?

@rosenotes Most if not all religions have good fruit in the lives of their faithful members. Truth is what separates the wheat from the chaff. Who Jesus really is matters. But teddyaware is right. If you really want to learn about the Latter-day Saints, study with missionaries. But don't read only a few parts in the Book of Mormon and then pray to decide that the whole thing is from God. Even some parts of the Quran agree with the Bible.

The letter is still accessible - https://cesletter.org/CES-Letter.pdf Some rebuttal is here: https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/blog/2021/08/25/ces-rebuttal-part-1-extended-version https://archive.bookofmormoncentral.org/sites/default/files/archive-files/pdf/bennett/2019-03-04/jim_bennett_a_faithful_reply_to_the_ces_letter_from_a_former_ces_employee_2018.pdf

It's a battle between humans, farmland, crypto, and AI. Not enough water to go around.

"The water the development would use would not be taken away from the Great Salt Lake, he said, but rather would be a reallocation of water rights currently earmarked for other uses. The project developers, he went on, would have to abide by state air standards". This reallocation has not been identified.

A head of gold 🙂

I couldn't find any Catholic teachings indicating the 70-year prophecy has been fulfilled.

What about the last week in Daniel's 70 Weeks prophecy? Already fulfilled?

The video interprets the vision of Daniel 2. The channel is "Shameless Popery, by Joe Heschmeyer. #1 begins the video with an analysis of the stone being the Roman Catholic Church. #2 begins a discussion about how the Mormon Church interpreted the stone cut out of the mountain. Starts at about the 15:27 minute mark. #3 seems to describe the dispensationalist view, that it is fulfilled at the Second Coming. The last part gives a summary, labelled "What does Daniel 2 prove about the Church" (35:35). I believe there will be ten kings which come out of some sort of a revived Roman Empire. They will receive a kingdom in the future. The beast of Revelation 17 is the same beast that Christ defeats at the Second Coming, in Revelation 19. "And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful". "And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire. For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled" (Rev 17). "And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone" (Rev 19). I don't believe the Roman Catholic Church is that kingdom established in the days of Christ because it co-existed with the ungodly kingdoms which currently existed then and those that would eventually form when the Roman Empire fell, but was not conquered by another kingdom like the progressive stages of the statue reveals. IMO, Daniel 2 does not depict the kingdom of Christ growing gradually while those other ungodly systems still continued to exist side by side throughout millennia.

Let's talk further when a gold statue of DJT is erected 🙂

Thanks. I'll check it.

You mean an impersonal force as opposed to a personal God?

Where did you find that?

Can you explain the difference between Abraham 3:24 and Abraham 4:1? In Abraham 3:24, it says: "And there stood one among them that was like unto God, and he said unto those who were with him: We will go down, for there is space there, and we will take of these materials, and we will make an earth whereon these may dwell". In Abraham 4:1, it says: "And then the Lord said: Let us go down. And they went down at the beginning, and they, that is the Gods, organized and formed the heavens and the earth". Did only the Gods go down to create the earth or were there others who were not Gods? And which Gods went down?