So you think that Marburg (which could potentially kill more than half of the population of earth if it became airborne or more infectious), or something else, is currently being engineered to cover up for adverse reactions to covid vaccine?
Would anyone in their right mind not fight for a hastily concocted vaccine if a strain of Marburg, which could potentially kill more than half of the population of earth if it became airborne or more infectious? Probably not. Have you ever wondered why people didn’t riot in order to obtain the covid injections? Surely you don’t think all those who are not yet injected are conspiracy theorists? That would be very conspiracy-theorist-type of thinking and, of course, perish the thought.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wMhMjLTVuR70/ - panel of doctors
https://www.facebook.com/idahofreedom/videos/212746730593293/?fallback=1 – Dr. Ryan Cole
You’ll need to do better than Google results from FactCheck which owns a significant amount of one of the Big Pharma Cartel companies peddiling the injections. Pfizer, I think,
"Adverse reactions that covid injections will manifest"? They already have. VAERS which according to Harvard captures 1% of adverse reactions.
At the macro level you may compare death rates YOY year over year according to your preferred cohorts (age, race, gender, location, etc.). What increase in that death rate would suggest something suspicious? That is the question.
At the micro lovel, it’s all very formulaic but take: height, weight, age, race, gender, blood type, pre-existing conditions (obesity, diabetes, cancer, history of heart problems, parents, grandparents, hereditary genetic predispositions, etc.) of the target population you have in mind (fully vaxxed in the US perhaps, assuming google and the federal gov’t aren’t inflating the numbers, which they likely are). Then subtract the percentage that you believe/disbelieve received a placebo (I’ve read 30-50% though that seems high to me), and then compare death rates YOY. I’ve also heard that 66% of people who’ve been injected over 5 years will manifest significant adverse reactions, again due to the variance in age, weight, gender, race, health level, exercise, diet, environmental pollution, etc. YOY cohort comparison seems to be the most direct measurement.
What kind of reactions do you anticipate?
Those which have already manifest.
Myocarditis and Pericarditis After Vaccination for COVID-19 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2782900#248009130
Journal of Pediatrics: https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/148/3/e2021052644
In this month’s issue of Pediatrics, Marshall et al report a case series describing seven 14- to 19-year-old male individuals who developed symptomatic myocarditis after the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine.1 The authors report that the symptoms began between 2 and 4 days after the second dose and that all 7 patients experienced rapid resolution of symptoms. This case series is published in the context of other media reports of myocarditis in young adults, mostly male, from the US military and from Israel2 as well as a recent increase in reports of myocarditis after serious acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).3 As such, this case series offers useful preliminary information on clinical and therapeutic details regarding myocarditis among adolescents.
Deaths caused from covid injections – temporary removed by NIH (no reason given: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8483988/):
A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products
Jessica Rose 1, Peter A McCullough 2
Free PMC article
Following the global rollout and administration of the Pfizer Inc./BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines on December 17, 2020, in the United States, and of the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S product on April 1st, 2021, in an unprecedented manner, hundreds of thousands of individuals have reported adverse events (AEs) using the Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS). We used VAERS data to examine cardiac AEs, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 injectable products. Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 (p<0.0001) with ∼80% occurring in males. Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12-15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group. In addition, a 5-fold increase in myocarditis rate was observed subsequent to dose 2 as opposed to dose 1 in 15-year-old males. A total of 67% of all cases occurred with BNT162b2. Of the total myocarditis AE reports, 6 individuals died (1.1%) and of these, 2 were under 20 years of age - 1 was 13. These findings suggest a markedly higher risk for myocarditis subsequent to COVID-19 injectable product use than for other known vaccines, and this is well above known background rates for myocarditis. COVID-19 injectable products are novel and have a genetic, pathogenic mechanism of action causing uncontrolled expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within human cells. When you combine this fact with the temporal relationship of AE occurrence and reporting, biological plausibility of cause and effect, and the fact that these data are internally and externally consistent with emerging sources of clinical data, it supports a conclusion that the COVID-19 biological products are deterministic for the myocarditis cases observed after injection.
Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19-Injection-Related Myocarditis (CIRM); SARS-CoV-2; VAERS; adverse events (AEs); myocarditis.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
If the reaction doesn't fit the symptom profile of Marburg, how is it going to work as a "cover up" exactly?
Easy. Think of a Venn Diagram, the overlapping section in the middle. The symptoms of the Marburg strain will overlap with the adverse reactions of the covid injections, primarily due to polyethylene glycol, polysorbate, graphene oxide, and the mRNA which tells your body to create spike proteins to catch and kill the live, viral covid spike proteins when you’re exposed.
If the reaction is cancer, we can't blame that on Marburg. If it is blindness, again, not Marburg. If it causes my innards to boil and explode, again, not Marburg. You seem to think that any bug (despite having different manifestations) will work perfectly as a cover up for this supposed covid injection reaction that we are all doomed to have.
Some injections are designed to exacerbate underlying health problems. If exacerbating injections are deployed then, yes, we can attribute cancer, blindness, and boiling and exploding innards to exacerbating underlying genetic hereditary factors and predispositions. (Perhaps what you’re really trying to do is claim injections aren’t confounding or primary factors when they can easily be contributing factors and still highly, directly relevant.) That’s why the current injections restrict blood flow to certain areas while increasing it too much to others – due to the variance of the population’s existing preconditions. Would you rather have fewer people on earth and millions starving each year or would you reduce the population in a calm yet coercive fashion? You’re not that callous, are you?
You’re not all doomed to have those side effects and I pray none of you have them. The real question is: how many grandparents, great aunts, great uncles, etc. need to die before it becomes suspicious? Especially when we’re all predisposed to say things like: They lived a good life. They’ve gone on to their glory. There’s a bigger group of people shouting them welcome than there are people here mourning their homegoing, etc.
If you are so confident that there will be a reaction, you musts certainly know what will be the cause of the reaction. Without a known cause (a particular ingredient in the vaccine), then you can't be certain of anything. polyethylene glycol, polysorbate, graphene oxide as a start. mRNA-induced spike protein creation which increased blood flow and decreases blood flow to existing areas the person’s body already has.
Also, if you are so confident that covid vaccines will cause a reaction so terrible that Marburg would be needed to cover it up, you must be beyond furious that our prophet who you claim to sustain is mandating that our children be vaccinated for their missions? They don't get a choice if they want to serve as they are called by the Lord.
It seems presumptuous of me, were I missionary age, to assume I would be serving internationally. Submitting papers with a preference for any location, then after receiving the call, and if it was outside of your country, then sure, get vaxxed if you feel the risk and cost-benefit are appropriate for your risk appetite.
More to your point – since it’s prophesied that all the missionaries will be called home – whether that means all missions are temporarily closed or whether it means all missionaries serve domestically, which we’ve already seen due to covid, I don’t know – why would I risk my health in exchange for the potential to serve in another country – after presuming I know better than the General Authorities as to where I will serve?
Unprecedented times call for unprecedented measures. If the Prophet whom I sustain encouraged some of us to do things that would speed up the time when we go to our glory, why would anyone begrudge him for that? What do you expect him to do – advise against the injections? The Church handbook accurately discusses vaccines and says it’s best left to the individual and their physician. (This might be due to the variance in the health of members of the Church.)
Let me guess, you are suffering it to be so...
No, the Lord is and so is his Prophet. I’m not willing.
I am hoping wonderful things happen to you and all of us, as the next few years will depend on little more than good will. If you think the shortages we’re facing now are inconvenient, just wait. Unprecedented times and all that.
Instead of being inspired by all the other passages in the BoM and Bible that call the righteous to intervene against wicked designs, you are going to take the popcorn and recliner option to watch it all unfold?
Yes. What would you suggest for someone w/ pre-existing conditions and a medical exemption- a FEMA camp perhaps? Or buy lots of guns and ammo? Careful, pogi, sometimes you really flirt with those conspiracy theorist ideas.
But wait, there’s more:
A new Centers for Disease Control report shows 94% of people who died from COVID-19 in the U.S. had contributing health conditions. (https://www.axios.com/cdc-covid-deaths-contributing-health-conditions-3315196c-986f-4ae3-ba35-2075fd64bce1.html - This means 6% died from COVID and not contributing health conditions. That's 36,480 out of the 608,000 US deaths due to COVID.)
The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) has released an update to their research on the fatality rate associated with COVID-19. The CDC first posted this data on May 20, 2020, with the understanding that the parameter values would be updated and augmented over time. This update, dated September 10th, is based on data received by CDC through August 8, 2020.
A quick summary of COVID-19 survival rates is shown below. The summary is based on the CDC table provided at the end of this report.
CDC COVID-19 Survival Rates
Age 0-19 — 99.997%
Age 20-49 — 99.98%
Age 50-69 — 99.5%
Age 70+ — 94.6%
But because of the significant number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic people with COVID-19, the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention estimates the number of infected people could be 10 times the number of confirmed cases.
Using the current numbers, that means more than 30 million people could have been infected, which would make the infection fatality rate 0.4% -- meaning 99.6% of people survive the virus.
CDC says masks don't work (https://drugstorenews.com/otc/cdc-study-reveals-face-masks-ineffective-against-spread-pandemic-flu-due-americans-lack-use).