Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Burnside

Queztal Codex: More Proof the Mesoamerica Georaphy Theory was Plagiarized from RLDS

Recommended Posts

Book of Mormon Foundation (BOMF) https://www.bomf.org/ started from the apostate The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (RLDS) now calling itself The Community of Christ (CofC) with the “Restoration Branches” which split off of CofC.

Here: https://www.bomf.org/bmf-history.html

On its site is the Queztal Codex: https://www.bomf.org/quetzal-codex.html , with sporadic publications (sporadic as in dates of publication). Notice the bottom two links to short articles mentioning “Mesoamerica” and complaining about the “Heartland Model” and “Rod Meldrum.”

In the one page article “Book of Mormon Geography Remains a Hot Topic,” Louise Edward Hills is mentioned as the FIRST to place the setting solely in Mesoamerica, quoting John L. Sorenson : ab2b2af19abd38d8bcfa83c563ac1ba8?AccessK

Hills is mentioned in more of these Queztal Codex articles.

Here is Louise Edward Hills book for your perusal: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89058377359;view=1up;seq=5

Here is Oliver Cowdery writing in Letter VII that the final battles of the Jaredites and Nephites occurred at the Hill Cumorah in New York:

https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1834-1836/90

Ha ha ha! 

Book of Mormon Central, The Interpreter Foundation, BMAF, and the now defunct F.A.R.M.S. etc. all started by LDS Members, plagiarized a FRAUD of a geography theory from the RLDS Church. And gullible members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, bought it.

That’s why images like this with Maya imagery exist in Church buildings, and sadly in Temples. Inspired by a fraud.

 

26243992-88DC-49C9-9AD1-992353706708.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post

Still trolling on behalf of Mr Scratch, I see, Burnside.

Yes, the Book of Mormon Foundation in Independence, Missouri, does carry on the work of the earlier RLDS tradition of belief in the Book of Mormon, and they publish a regular magazine called The Witness (www.bomf.org ).

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, Robert F. Smith said:

Still trolling on behalf of Mr Scratch, I see, Burnside.

Yes, the Book of Mormon Foundation in Independence, Missouri, does carry on the work of the earlier RLDS tradition of belief in the Book of Mormon, and they publish a regular magazine called The Witness (www.bomf.org ).

Ah, old Scatch is behind this? I miss that pervy weirdo. Oh wait, no I don’t.

To avoid derailing the thread I will sum up the OP of the thread:

obsession_quote.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post

The BoM text does not allow for the final battles to be fought at the NY drumlin. For the Jaredites they speak of 2 million people having died near there. For the Nephites there were 240,000 that died on one side alone. The NY hill would never have been chosen by any competent military leader as a final defensive position. 

The artists rendition of Christ's appearance shows people dressed in many modes, few being anywhere near Mayan. The temple in the far background  looks like one at Tikal ,but having been there, I never saw any mountains looming high .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Burnside said:

Ha ha ha! 

Well played, sir! Well played indeed.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post

Agreeing with someone isn't plagiarism. Mesoamerica is an obvious location. And theories about mesoamerica go back very far. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, Robert F. Smith said:

Still trolling on behalf of Mr Scratch, I see, Burnside.

Typically, there isn't a Scratch without an Itch.  Do you suppose this will help?

81kpQYZqzbL._SX355_.jpg

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Oh, you’re all so upset to discover The Two-Cumorah Mesoamerica Book of Mormon geography theory was started by the RLDS Church.

All because The LDS Church bought the Hill Cumorah in New York which irritated the RLDS Church, so they said the New York Hill wasn’t important. But none of you were bright enough to figure that out, were you? There was back in the day court challenges to the owners of Church property in the east after the Saints went to SLC.

How sad for you all.

  • People here on MormonDialogue can start discussions criticizing the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints over it’s policies, doctrines and teachings.
  • They can complain about Pres. Nelson not being prophetic.
  • They complain and moan about The Church not accepting this or not agreeing with that worldy teaching.
  • But if one challenges or criticizes The Two-Cumorah Mesoamerica Geography Theory as coming form the RLDS Church, then you get banned, or at least your privilege to start new discussions is first taken away and the avility to add photos.
  • What a sorry saggy website. It engages in censorship.

Now your sadness will be over and you will no longer will have to be faced with reality and can you go back to your silly dreams of Mesoamerica and continue your 501(c)(3) business models with you’re outstretched hands begging for donations via a PayPal button.

Please send us money! We have to discover The Hill Cumorah in Mexico!”

Oh wait. It’s already been discovered. By the Buckner, MO Branch of The Community of Christ. http://hceti.org/

Notice the photo of the spring at The Hill Cumorah “South” on the last page of their Spring newsletter date March 2019: https://www.hillcumorahexpeditionteam.com/files/NewsletterVol13Issue1.pdf

They’re all set to discover Mormon’s Library in a cave in said hill. They just need to find the cave.

“The connections made with the land-owner at the stela mound were very cordial. The vision of what will be happening in the next year was shared and warmly welcomed. There was an air of mutual affinity between all parties as potentials were considered. The pres- ence of God’s Spirit was apparent as doors opened and pathways were creat- ed. The coming forth of Mormon’s library is eminent with a strange and marvelous work about to commence to be a catalyst for the latter-day harvest.” Page 4

These rec- ords will reveal what God has done and continues to do on a global scale for the salvation of man.
Will you please pray for us and the fulfillment of God’s purposes? We all play a part in this. A movement of uni- ty is taking place, and our humble pray- ers and loving embrace for all of God’s creation will assist in bringing His Kingdom into physical existence. The Kingdom of God is about to be made manifest on this Earth!! God bless, and endure to the end!“ Page 4

”The stage is now set for the people of the world to see. Who will be the individuals that will play the defining roles? Will it be HCETI? We don’t know the answer but we do know it will be the Lord’s choosing, not man. We just pray that we have done our part to put the pieces together to advance the knowledge to the world of who the Maya are and their testimony of the risen Savior. We know by prophecy contained in the Book of Mormon, that the records se- cured by Mormon in Hill Cumorah (southern Mexico) are a key to unlock- ing the mysteries of it all. The world will see. The world will know. But will the world believe? Hold on tight, it’s going to be an amazing journey.” Page 2

This is the garbage that Book of Mormon Central promotes.

Here Dr. John L. Sorenson, LDS,  makes clear he plagiarized the Two-Cumorah theory from RLDS Scholar, Louise E. Hills.

https://publications.mi.byu.edu/book/the-geography-of-book-of-mormon-events-a-sourcebook/ P. 32-33 of the .pdf document.

But you’re all too stupid to figure that out, aren’t you? EVEN WHEN YOU’RE SPOONFED with the knowledge.

https://publications.mi.byu.edu/publications/bookchapters/Geography_of_Book_of_Mormon_Events/Sorenson- The Geography of Book of Mormon Events, A Source Book, lo-res.pdf

Here’s an article from the Queztal Codex publication from BOMF.org, an RLDS publication quoting Sorenson.

ab2b2af19abd38d8bcfa83c563ac1ba8?AccessK

and in this one Page 2:

“Finally, Louis Hills’ 1917 map of Mesoamerica compiled from the internal requirements of The Book of Mormon shifted the focus to a more limited geography in Mesoamerica, with the Isthmus of Tehuantepec identified as the Narrow Neck, a position accepted by most Book of Mormon scholars today (Sorenson 1992:32).”

45f4823cc520d4a3a87ad9ade90cc8dc?AccessK

I’ve found so much information that the Two-Cumorah Geography Theory was started by the RLDS and continues with it and is plagiarized by LDS Scholars that I could out-debate you intellectual cowards anytime. 

But no. You’re all scared of the TRUTH. You’d rather sit on this site and crack stupid jokes.

But when a newcomer arrives and turns your world inside out, you all whine like little babies, even when spoon fed. 

So remain ignorant, since you’re now responsible for your own learning.

Share this post


Link to post
25 minutes ago, Burnside said:

But if one challenges or criticizes The Two-Cumorah Mesoamerica Geography Theory as coming form the RLDS Church, then you get banned, or at least your privilege to start new discussions is first taken away and the avility to add photos.

Perhaps if you would engage in discussion instead of ridicule.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Burnside said:

Oh, you’re all so upset to discover The Two-Cumorah Mesoamerica Book of Mormon geography theory was started by the RLDS Church.

Why would anyone be upset?  That would be like getting upset if one found out the Christus we use so much was originally made for a Lutheran church:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christus_(statue)

 

Edited by Calm
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post

It's a case of ad homen argument fallacy and makes the further mistake of not realizing those he raises aren't particularly disliked.

I'm at the stage of not really thinking this is even a real post. Seems like someone trolling but doing a caricature of how they think people argue. Doing it for the lols.

Edited by clarkgoble
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Burnside
      On one of Book of Mormon Central’s (BMC) website it states:
      “We hope our efforts help all of the religious organizations within the Restoration Movement who cherish the Book of Mormon.” https://bookofmormoncentral.org/content/donation-instructions  [bold added]
      What is the Restoration Movement and the religious organizations within it?
      On the Hill Cumorah Expedition Team web site, it states:
      “The Book of Mormon is many things to many people.  To some, it is the main 
      purpose for the founding of a church in early 19th century America.  To the 
      Restoration movement and all of the many factions, the Book of Mormon is the 
      scripture that distinguishes it from other Christian faiths.
      https://www.hillcumorahexpeditionteam.com/WhatisBofMormon.html [bold added]
      Many factions?
      What is the Hill Cumorah Expedition Team? 
      “During the summer of 2001 several members of the Buckner Congregation of 
      the Community of Christ traveled to Mexico to visit ancient ruins.  They were 
      excited to have Neil Steede as a guide and travel companion.  Several sites 
      were visited including Palenque, Cacaxtla, Cuicuilco, Comalcalco, Cholula, and 
      Teotihuacan.  While traveling the group took a detour and went to see Cerro 
      Rabon, a mountain near Jalapa de Diaz that many Book of Mormon 
      archaeologists have reason to believe is the Hill Cumorah where ancient 
      records are buried.”
      https://www.hillcumorahexpeditionteam.com/ourbeginning.html
      Ah! This answers the question of the “religious organizations or the many factions within the Restoration Movement which cherish The Book of Mormon.”
      They would include:
      The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS)
      The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (RLDS)
      The Community of Christ which is the new name for the RLDS Church (CofC)
      Restoration Branches - RLDS congregations which broke off of the RLDS Church over women given the priesthood (now that sounds familiar!) , etc: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restoration_branches
      Do you know of others?
      (Now you know one of the reasons why Pres. Nelson has asked us to refer to the complete name of the Church.)
      But why is Jack Welch co-founder of BMC wanting to help all of these religious organizations within the “Restoration Movement” which cherish The Book of Mormon? 
      Because Jack Welch and BMC is perpetuating a fraud, a Book of Mormon geography fraud.
      This is why a CofC Congregation in Missouri has expeditions to Central America looking for the Hill Cumorah:
      https://www.hillcumorahexpeditionteam.com/ or http://hceti.org/
      Here is a book published by a member of the then RLDS Church, now CofC, Louise E. Hills, “New Light on American Archeology,” 1924, Independence, MO, Page 131.
      https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89058377359;view=1up;seq=135
      This is a contrived, false, fraud and a hoax created by the RLDS Chruch of a Two-Cumorah Book of Mormon geography theory NOW BEING promoted by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who own and work for:
      Book of Mormon Central
      The Interpreter Foundation
      FairMormon
      ..and others who promote the theory which places Book of Mormon geography strictly within Mesoamerica and ignore President Oliver Cowdery who wrote that it was a fact that the final Jaredite and Nephite battles occurred near the Hill Cumorah in New York. https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1834-1836/90
      Maybe you believe there are Two Hill Cumorahs, the original one in Central America somewhere. Why don’t you join this CofC Congregation which believes the same and help them discover the Hill Cumorah in Central America. As RLDS Louise E Hills wrote, Page 131:
      1 am aware that Moroni wrote that he made his
      synopsis of the Jaredite history "from the twenty and
      four plates," but at what time he did this I do not know.
      It may have been done before his father's death, to be
      in preparation for the Lord's purpose that such
      "account" of the Jaredites should be known in our time.
      At least Oliver Cowdery's statement of the contents of
      the box, namely, that it contained a "sketch" of the two
      peoples seems to make it plain that Moroni did not place
      the original Jaredite record in the New York hilL I
      have no objection to that hill being also called Cumorah,
      with the understanding that the ancient hill Cumorah
      is still undiscovered, and that sometime its secrets will
      be revealed and come to the knowledge of God's people.
      Join the expedition! 😏😄😄
    • By Burnside
      Visit JosephSmithPapers.org and in the search box enter “Cumorah”.
      It will return 16 results for “Cumorah” and the 16 links to articles from Church History.
      But none of the 16 results will include the two instances Cumorah is mentioned in Letter VII.
      These two links, two pages next to each other:
      https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1834-1836/90
      https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1834-1836/91
      Oliver Cowdery wrote in the first: “on the fact, that here, between these hills, the entire power and national strength of both the Jaredites and Nephites were destroyed. By turning to the 529th and 530thpages of the book of Mormonyou will read Mormon’s account of the last great struggle of his people, as they were encamped round this hill Cumorah.”
      In the second he wrote: “He, however, by divine appointment, abridged from those records, in his own style and language, a short account of the more important and prominent items, from the days of Lehi to his own time, after which he deposited, as he says, on the 529th page, all the records in this same hill, Cumorah and after gave his small record to his son Moroni, who, as appears from the same, finished, after witnessing the extinction of his people as a nation.
      Why are these two pages left out of the search result, you may wonder? Why are they hidden?
      These two statements directly conflict with the Mesoamerica Geography Theory for The Book of Mormon which originated with RLDS Scholars and is now being promoted today by Scholars who are members of the LDS Church or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This Mesoamerica theory claims there are two Hills of Cumorah, the original one being in Central America where the final battles took place and where the Prophet Mormon buried the many records.
      Now you know why the two statements above by Oliver Cowdery conflict with this plagiarized Two-Hill Cumorah Mesoamerica Geography Theory.
      So what influence is JosephSmithPapers receiving which would leave out these two search results? A computer error in the search is unlikely. Search features have long been available in many software products, such as MS Excel, Word, and so forth.
      Notice the influence by BookofMormonCentral (BMC) on JosephSmithPapers. BMC promotes the Mesoamerica Geography theory. BMC recently published what they call a “KnoWhy” stating we should disbelieve Oliver Cowdrey in Letter VII. It’s FAKE NEWS so I won’t link to it.
      (It should be called a KnowLie.)
      But I will link to Jack Welch’s bio at BMC.
      Jack Welch the founder of FARMS and recently in 2015 the founder of BMC. Notice Jack Welch’s influence over JosephSmithPapers:
      https://bookofmormoncentral.org/content/donation-instructions
      2007 - Present   Consulting Editor, Joseph Smith Papers Project
      2015 -                Co-Founded Book of Mormon Central
       Now you know one the main sources of this FAKE Mesoamerica Two-Hill Cumorah Geography Theory and its influence on Church History.

    • By HappyJackWagon
      In 1835 when the Quorum of 12 Apostles was organized, Oliver Cowdery gave a charge to all of the new apostles. The whole thing is a bit long but the paragraph I'm interested in reads.
      Oliver, who of course was the 2nd Elder of the church, seems to be suggesting that the ordination of Apostle is incomplete until the Apostle sees God face to face and/or has the Savior lay hands upon the disciple's head. This would seem to build the expectation that all apostles since 1835, in following this original charge, have sought and likely received this personal, miraculous manifestation. This raises expectations about how prophets and apostles receive revelation.
      If they had not seen God face to face or had Jesus lay hands on them, would that change the nature of their calling? I am not aware of a prophet or apostle since Joseph Smith who has claimed to see God face to face or have Christ lay hands on them. (I'd love to see sources to the contrary)
      However, Hugh B. Brown, in his book An Abundant Life (p 126-127) stated he received a charge when he was called as an apostle and it seems to be different from Oliver's original charge regarding the high expectations for receiving personal revelation and even visitations. Brown states he was told in his more recent apostolic charge that he should...
      Growing up I recall being taught and believing that the apostles and prophets had all seen God and therefore were special witnesses of Christ. The D&C states that they are "special witnesses of the name of Christ" which is the way the brethren seem to talk about it in today's world. I recall believing that Jesus directed His church through direct revelation to the brethren, similar to how Oliver set the expectation of spiritual witness and authority. The Hugh B Brown version seems to lower expectations dramatically as receiving revelation becomes more deliberative and democratic, where the majority of the Q15 declare what is or isn't revelation.
      Does anyone have any thoughts about these two different types of Apostolic Charges given to modern apostles?
    • By drums12
      I'm a novice when it comes to Book of Mormon geography.  I don't worry about it too much, at least not enough to study the various theories in detail.  Still, with so many debates in recent years, I do have a question:
       
      Do proponents of the two most popular geography models (heartland and Mesoamerica) take into account the cataclysmic geographic changes that took place when Christ was crucified?  If much of the geography described in the text predates the events of 3rd Nephi, doesn't that make the debate moot?  
×
×
  • Create New...