Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

So There's No Archaeological Evidence For The Book Of Mormon?

Recommended Posts

Did you miss the fact that the sample we are discussing is fresh out of the ground and hasn't been Argon tested yet nor has it been Mounted and Preserved so Organic Shalak can't account for the C14 in it?


I'm talking about the Schweitzer bones, which were in stratum that multiple dating methods confirmed were 65 million years old. How does a 33,000 year old sample get embedded in a stratum definitively dated at 65 million years? Can you tell me what the dating is for the stratum from which the Armitage samp[e was drawn and how that was determined? Was it in a stratum dated in the tens of thousands of years or millions?

Share this post

Link to post
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...